• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why the SBC Allegation List Should NOT Have Been Released

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Somehow, Freedom of The Press has been construed to mean "As a reporter/publisher I can say anything I want about anybody, and IF it cannot be proved that I INTENTIONALLY MEANT TO SLANDER HIM, then the FOTP is my "get out of jail" card.:Devilish:Mad
I firmly believe that there will be a special place in hell for people who couldn't care less how their decisions can adversely affect others!!!!!!!!:Devilish
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How many names are on the list and how many of those identified are actually guilty of disqualifying behavior? And why were they, if the behavior occurred, not disqualified by the SBC leaders who were supposed to protect the flock?

Changing the subject to the errors of others, rather than being self-critical, is not helpful.
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
How many names are on the list and how many of those identified are actually guilty of disqualifying behavior? And why were they, if the behavior occurred, not disqualified by the SBC leaders who were supposed to protect the flock?

Changing the subject to the errors of others, rather than being self-critical, is not helpful.
@Van my point is that the SBC is not handling this in a biblical manner according to Matthew 18.
 

5 point Gillinist

Active Member
This SBC dumpster fire just keeps getting worse and worse. It'd be better if the remaining solid churches pulled out and started their own convention.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
How many names are on the list and how many of those identified are actually guilty of disqualifying behavior? And why were they, if the behavior occurred, not disqualified by the SBC leaders who were supposed to protect the flock? ...

Remember, leadership at the SBC (national, State and/or local) have NO authority over local churches. The leadership can inform the local church of the violation and recommend action. And that's it. It is up to the church to take action.

The only time leadership can take action is if the individual is employed by the SBC ie Lifeway, Seminary, Guide stone, ect. At the local association - a pastor might be on the Association leadership team - then the Association - could remove him from that team - and finally the only action the SBC, State or local can take is to remove fellowship from that church.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Remember, leadership at the SBC (national, State and/or local) have NO authority over local churches. SNIP

They had the authority to act on the reported malfeasance, both to investigate, and to inform. Leaders are to protect the flock, especially from wolves in sheep's clothing.
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
And my point is not to change the subject, but address the suppression of truth issue.
Well the subject on this thread is why they are wrong in the way they are going about this. So you should not change the subject.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
They had the authority to act on the reported malfeasance, both to investigate, and to inform. Leaders are to protect the flock, especially from wolves in sheep's clothing.

Actually, they do NOT have the authority to investigate - without the authorization of the local church. If they suspected - they should have contacted the local govt authorities - ie police, doctor, ect.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
Actually, they do NOT have the authority to investigate - without the authorization of the local church. If they suspected - they should have contacted the local govt authorities - ie police, doctor, ect.
National leadership should have the mandate and authority to step in with real power when these type of allegations are being made though
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Rather than address the malfeasance of the SBC leadership, we are getting non-stop efforts to shoot the messenger .
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsr

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
National leadership should have the mandate and authority to step in with real power when these type of allegations are being made though

Jesus Fan -
Are you SBC - if not - what group of Baptist is your church
and if you are not Baptist - what denomination is your church with?
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
Rather than address the malfeasance of the SBC leadership, we are getting non-stop efforts to shoot the messenger .
And if you read the article in the OP you would know that HARM has been done to INNOCENT individuals BECAUSE of the way the message has been carried. Why are you ignoring that?
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Rather than address the malfeasance of the SBC leadership, we are getting non-stop efforts to shoot the messenger .

Nothing about this post is true. Every issue should be dealt with. No one disputes that. What is concerning is the way they are handling this. Complete malpractice.
 

AustinC

Well-Known Member
I find it heartening that it is being reported that this pastor was falsely accused. This means that the press isn't suppressing the truth.

Yes, it is wrong that he was initially accused, falsely, but it is good that the press is corrective in this matter.
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
I find it heartening that it is being reported that this pastor was falsely accused. This means that the press isn't suppressing the truth.

Yes, it is wrong that he was initially accused, falsely, but it is good that the press is corrective in this matter.
But there should have never been a public list in the first place to have this happen.
 
Top