Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
@Van my point is that the SBC is not handling this in a biblical manner according to Matthew 18.How many names are on the list and how many of those identified are actually guilty of disqualifying behavior? And why were they, if the behavior occurred, not disqualified by the SBC leaders who were supposed to protect the flock?
Changing the subject to the errors of others, rather than being self-critical, is not helpful.
How many names are on the list and how many of those identified are actually guilty of disqualifying behavior? And why were they, if the behavior occurred, not disqualified by the SBC leaders who were supposed to protect the flock? ...
And my point is not to change the subject, but address the suppression of truth issue.@Van my point is that the SBC is not handling this in a biblical manner according to Matthew 18.
Remember, leadership at the SBC (national, State and/or local) have NO authority over local churches. SNIP
Well the subject on this thread is why they are wrong in the way they are going about this. So you should not change the subject.And my point is not to change the subject, but address the suppression of truth issue.
They had the authority to act on the reported malfeasance, both to investigate, and to inform. Leaders are to protect the flock, especially from wolves in sheep's clothing.
Would be time to have a Reformation among the SBC, eh?This SBC dumpster fire just keeps getting worse and worse. It'd be better if the remaining solid churches pulled out and started their own convention.
National leadership should have the mandate and authority to step in with real power when these type of allegations are being made thoughActually, they do NOT have the authority to investigate - without the authorization of the local church. If they suspected - they should have contacted the local govt authorities - ie police, doctor, ect.
National leadership should have the mandate and authority to step in with real power when these type of allegations are being made though
And if you read the article in the OP you would know that HARM has been done to INNOCENT individuals BECAUSE of the way the message has been carried. Why are you ignoring that?Rather than address the malfeasance of the SBC leadership, we are getting non-stop efforts to shoot the messenger .
I am not at all in favor of National Leadership controlling Local churches.National leadership should have the mandate and authority to step in with real power when these type of allegations are being made though
Rather than address the malfeasance of the SBC leadership, we are getting non-stop efforts to shoot the messenger .
Exactly, that is the point.Nothing about this post is true. Every issue should be dealt with. No one disputes that. What is concerning is the way they are handling this. Complete malpractice.
But there should have never been a public list in the first place to have this happen.I find it heartening that it is being reported that this pastor was falsely accused. This means that the press isn't suppressing the truth.
Yes, it is wrong that he was initially accused, falsely, but it is good that the press is corrective in this matter.