Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Wrong again. Read the Federalist Papers #46 to educate yourself regarding the meaning and intent of the 2nd amendment.Surely that's the National Guard, Army and the police?
More Whataboutism
Face it Matt, we are a VIOLENT people.
It's a necessary evil because of a few things called "freedom" and "self preservation" to name a couple.
It started in the American colonies when we rebelled against the tyranny of the British Crown.
Fortunately or unfortunately depending on your point of view there is indeed a price to pay when a nation has a Bill of Rights and a free society.
So far we have chosen the Bill of Rights these 240 or so years.
When the Bill of Rights disappears America disappears.
View attachment 1980
Yes it is a little strange the way we treat our airport security versus our children's schools.
What has your Islamophobia got to do with anything?
More Whataboutism
Exactly. In 1933 Hitler and his Nazis won a landslide election. And the murder of 16 million people soon followed.
In 1931, Weimar authorities authorized the registration of all firearms and their confiscation, if required for “public safety.”
In 1938, Hitler signed a new Gun Control Act. Restrictions were removed for Nazi Party members. But Jews were prohibited from working in the firearms industry or owning firearms.
What followed was Kristallnacht, Concentration Camps, and the murder of Jews and other "undesirables."
Suppose they people all grew wings and just flew away, that way nobody would have been hurt.suppose the armed people in the audience had fired back:
What-if-ism.Because you haven't even grasped the point being made: suppose the armed people in the audience had fired back: how long would it have taken it to degenerate into a complete free for all with firearms going off right left and centre even before the police showed up? And when they did, how are they supposed to sort the good guys from the bad? The Vegas PD told armed civilians not to go to the scene for that very fear.
Very rare.
Likewise rare and tend to be gang related ie: one vriminal with abgun shotting another criminal with a gun
And how exactly is a guy with a gun in a nightclub supposed to stop someone who's just thrown avid at him (our latest acid attack)? More likely someone innocent would be killed.
Mostly yes, with one important exception: I know my kids won't get massacred at school by a gunman when I kiss them goodbye. Can you say the same?
Evidence?
You see, we can hang that drum too: we had to repel a foreign foe more deadly than yours and more recently. We then demobilised.
...and killing schoolchildren it would appear.
"The only answer to a bad toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun."
But why not remove one part of your problem by reducing the number of guns in circulation? Just because one part of a mechanism is broke doesn't mean that you neglect other parts.
Which....um...demonstrates an irrational fear of Muslims. I rest my caseWhat-a-phobia??? I don't have an irrational fear of Muslims. I just know that they are going to wipe England off of the map.
(a)But...to return to the debate in hand...
What happened to the other bit of the 2A, BTW, you know, the bit about having a well-regulated militia? Surely that's the National Guard, Army and the police? Why do all these other guys need guns under the 2A? At the very least, shouldn't you have the 'well-regulated' bit even if yiu dont have a proper militia, if you're going to allow civvies to have guns, like for example in Switzerland? Mandatory training, courses, inspections, keeping locked away etc?
So we come back to the viability if an 18th century solution to a 21st century problem.Wrong again. Read the Federalist Papers #46 to educate yourself regarding the meaning and intent of the 2nd amendment.
By the way, the Federalist Papers #46 was written by James Madison, the same guy who wrote the 2nd amendment.
Are they required to undergo any form of military training? If not, on what sense can they be held to constitute a militia(a)
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
National Guard or the Naval Militia.
10 U.S. Code § 246 - Militia: composition and classes
That's the definition according to federal law. Plain as it says. I can't dumb it down any more. Did you see any mention of training (in the case if males)? If not, it's because there isn't any.Are they required to undergo any form of military training? If not, on what sense can they be held to constitute a militia
Because there were no massacres in the 1700s? Lol, ok, right.So we come back to the viability if an 18th century solution to a 21st century problem.
Once again the issue flies far over your head. You just can't seem to understand having an inalienable, enumerated Constitutional right.So we come back to the viability if an 18th century solution to a 21st century problem.