Really? I can tell you that many, many churches fail to care for widows.We don't. You do.
Why? Backslidden?
If you don't fail in this specific command, what do you do, exactly?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Really? I can tell you that many, many churches fail to care for widows.We don't. You do.
Why? Backslidden?
Who do you consider a "widow" that should be helped?Really? I can tell you that many, many churches fail to care for widows.
If you don't fail in this specific command, what do you do, exactly?
I Tim 5 tells us what widows should be helped.Really? I can tell you that many, many churches fail to care for widows.
If you don't fail in this specific command, what do you do, exactly?
James 1Who do you consider a "widow" that should be helped?
I Tim 5 tells us what widows should be helped.
Is I Tim 5 corrupted?James 1
[27]Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you.
Why would it be?Is I Tim 5 corrupted?
That's right. Ideally, we should all be doing our part in the community and for those near to us.Why would helping widows have to be programmed? Do you really need a standing committee to be a loving, compassionate body?
We just did it expecting nothing in return.
According to it, widows with children and family are not the responsibility of the Church.Why would it be?
That's not what it says. If the family is able, they should care for their mom.According to it, widows with children and family are not the responsibility of the Church.
We have no written plans, "bylaws" or anything like that, if that is what you mean. We take 1 Timothy 5:3-16 as the scriptural guidelines in caring for widows. We don't "assume" that family members necessarily are taking care of widows, but we do teach they are the ones who have the first responsibility.What proactive plans does your church have in regard to caring for widows?
I notice many churches generally have no plan and often assume that family members are taking care of mom's who have had their husband die.
Are we, the church, failing in God's command that we care for widows and orphans?
How's that working? What is the size of the congregation?We have no written plans, "bylaws" or anything like that, if that is what you mean. We take 1 Timothy 5:3-16 as the scriptural guidelines in caring for widows. We don't "assume" that family members necessarily are taking care of widows, but we do teach they are the ones who have the first responsibility.
It is the job of the family.That's not what it says. If the family is able, they should care for their mom.
This is not always possible and so it falls upon the church to care for the widows and orphans.
What Paul does, in writing to Timothy, is give a hierarchy of whom you should help, within that group of widows.
Nowhere does Paul say that widows are not the responsibility of the church.
I've hit a nerve.
Good for those who are helping. You're a rare exception.
As for myself, I went to the hospital to see a person who is struggling with her chemo treatment. No need to tell me about caring for others. Check out a thread in another forum to read about what God has brought my family through.
The question I bring up is not meant as a personal accusation. It is an observation I have made from watching people.
It seems like you think that serving widows and orphans is an obligation instead of an opportunity to love people and honor Christ.It is the job of the family.