BobRyan
Well-Known Member
Lots of smoke - but no fire as usual CathConv.CathConvert
Thomas Bokenkotter's "A Concise History of the Catholic Church" pg 49
"at first the Christian presbyter or elder avoided any resemblance to the pagan or Jewish priests and in fact even deliberately refused to be called a priest.
CathConvert said --
And exactly WHERE does Bokenkotter get his information from? I swear, I get more than tired of all these "experts" who make statements like this for dummies to lap up just because "Bokenkotter says so".
Furthermore, you HYPOCTRITE, you will take the words of Bokenkotter, or any other anti-catholic as being the absolute imprimateur of truth, but when we quote the Early Fathers who were actually there and actually write about what was happening at that time we get 9 yards of grief and equivocation from you. What makes Bokenkotter absolutely reliable for doctrinal and eklessiastical history, but the Early Fathers not reliable at all? Hmmmmmmmmm???
Bokenkotter said --
He saw his primary function (instead) to be the ministry of the word...but the image of the Christian presbyter gradually took on a sacral character.
CathConvert said--
BALONEY!!! Bokenkotter's prejudice, pure and simple
Your lack of objectivity is "showing again".
Here you attack your own RC historians for daring to tell the truth about the RCC!!
Bokenkotter confesses at the front of his book in a section addressed to his critics - that he has NOT given justice to all the atrocities committed by the RCC during the dark ages and "almost apologetically" states that this is due to the brevity of the work - limiting it to one volume.
Well - at least he admitted it - that is more than you seem to be able to do.
In Christ,
Bob