Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Originally posted by Eladar:
Yes, this is the general approach liberals take. The Bible doesn't really say what it appears to say.It would make for better debate if you had studied the historical background so that you could interpret correctly and intelligently discuss a passage. Correct interpretation requires a thorough understanding of the historical background first.
And every conservative and fundamentalist as well.
If you would make such an outrageous claim then how might you interpret the following excerpts from three passages.
Matthew 8:28, "When He came to the other side into the country of the Gadarenes, two men who were demon-possessed met Him as they were coming out of the tombs. They were so extremely violent that no one could pass by that way."
Mark 5:2, "When He got out of the boat, immediately a man from the tombs with an unclean spirit met Him,"
and Luke 8:27, "And when He came out onto the land, He was met by a man from the city who was possessed with demons; and who had not put on any clothing for a long time, and was not living in a house, but in the tombs."
I is quite obvious you have not studied English literature nor taken any courses on interpretation of literature and documents. Because if you had you would have not made such remarks as you have about the historical background which is its context. Ever heard the saying context is everything? Every amount of posting you do is within a context. Your words only have meaning within a given context. To lift the words out of context is to give it a different meaning.Which is what you have done to what I have posted and others as well.
Originally posted by Eladar:
Are they being taken out of the house by force?
Who initiated this force?
The verse on the body being the temple of the Holy Spirit is INDEED relevant. Respecting your body means not allowing anyone to abuse it, be they your spouse, or a stranger.Too bad that this really don't apply. It has to do with how we live our lives, not what others do to us.
You may see this as defending abusers, but it is not.I have just read through some of the pages here, and I cannot believe that there are actually people defending those that Abuse their wives?
After writing this, I thought about all the womenOriginally posted by Abiyah:
Amein! I know this: my husband might get by with
hitting me -- once.
One thing I did not mention is that I would make an effort to spend time with my kids knowing that I was fighting this battle alone. If there was extended family around that wasn't as screwed up as the wife, perhaps they could help too.Well, your answers were good, but they never
would have worked in either of these very real
cases. Both husbands tried some of your ideas,
and tried some additional ones.
There are dynamics at play here. Everyone plays a part. If you get the picture from one side, you are getting a very distorted view. The family is a system and each member adds to and is affected by what other members do.I take food and items down to one of the local
shelters for abused women and their children, and
while the stories are different for each one, there
are basically about five stories total for all women
there. It is the same ol' same ol'. For the abused
woman, she married a man who was weak and
powerless, who took it out on her, belittling her,
entrapping her, using her, standing upon her,
because he could see no other way to rise higher.
I can agree with the last three sentences, but the "just as we must not be arrogant enough to believe we must be going to heaven, I cannot agree with that.just as we must not be arrogant enough to believe we must be going to heaven. God has a purpose for every life. Everyone has a part to play. Everything is for the greater glory of God.
You must have missed this post by Elk:Note: I said "as a child." I could easily
be wrong, but I do not think anyone else condoned
divorce, although Eladar took it as though we all
did -- just another twist of our words, another
accusation, another false platform to jump upon
in order to continue the vitriolics.
Now, I did not say anything about divorce, but you did. But since you brought up the topic, if the marriage we have on this earth is to be a type of parallel to Christ and the Body (The Bridegroom and the Bride), it is all about being faithful. So, please look into what faithful means.
In Jeremiah 3:8, God divorced His people for not being faithful, justly deserved as His people worshipped other gods and idols.
And what does this mean, idols? It is all about "self" and making up gods that please us. In the Old Testament there were gods that filled their own self interest, even temple sex, murder of children, etc. etc. It is no secret how a society can put their children on the flames of Chemosh because of their own selfish desires. In our society people do it all the time by getting abortions. It is the same. It is the idolatry of self.
And an abuser is heavy into idolatry of self.
The abuser is not faithful whatsoever, and to me that constitues unfaithfulness although the abuser does not necessarily need another mate to do an act of unfaithfulness.
Consider what faithful means.
Judas betrayed Jesus. But was he forgiven in the light of the Body of Christ?
Nope.
Jesus is ever faithful and fully demonstrates that He is the Bridegroom Who is ever Faithful. But I tell you one thing, Jesus said if we blaspheme, we will never be forgiven. This is about being faithful.
A man who abuses his wife is not faithful.
I am sorry that you do not understand my words that I had written.
Yes, sin is sin. Everyone sins. There is no escaping sin as long as we are in these bodies. Yet God's people will not live a lifestyle that is in rebellion to God's commands. By our fruits we are known.Really, in matters of divorce, theft, murder, lying, etc. etc., what difference does it make if we sin. Sin is sin.
This is why Jesus said it would be better if one did not marry at all. If someone dies, then that person's life is over and if that person was one of God's children, then that person will go to heaven.Do you think that one is trapped in marriage even if one is trying to kill the other? If the person allows it and gets murdered, won't even more sin be on another's head?
Only God knows the answer to that question. What purpose does any life serve? Everything is to God's purpose and to God's glory.I know the Bible says that we are sheep for the slaughter, but we don't have to help people to live in their sin of violence. What purpose does it serve?
It depends on your definition of love. People who get mixed up in bad marriages can still love. If a person is caught up in an addiction, then such a person is demonstrating a sign of the flesh and therefore probably doesn't demonstrate too much love.Really, are not people who get mixed up in bad marriages, drugs, drinking, and such, are they not often the people who love much?
Once again, that all depends on one's definition of love.Is there no pardon or forgiveness for love?
Matthew 19:8-12 He said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way. "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery."Originally posted by Elnora:
Wow I always thought it was better to be unmarried so a person could give all of his attention to serving the Lord.
I also though the definition of love was 1 Corinthians:13