All good stuff. But did you answer my question? How is the Christian to eat jesus’ flesh and drink His blood today so that he may have salvation? You gave this scripture in part when I asked how one is to be saved.
Spoken like a true literalist.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
All good stuff. But did you answer my question? How is the Christian to eat jesus’ flesh and drink His blood today so that he may have salvation? You gave this scripture in part when I asked how one is to be saved.
Spoken like a true literalist.
Martin, thank you for getting what I was saying. I don't criticize crackers. Actually, Catholics use both regular leavened bread and wafers. The Eastern Rites tend to use regular leavened bread while the Western or the Latin Rite uses the unleavened wafer. The reason I believe this is that it has symbolic reasons. Leaven in scriptures is often related to sin.Matthew26:26. 'And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to His disciples and said, "take, eat; this is My body."'
Just a quick question: do you take bread, or a wafer? The Greek word is artos. No need for unleavened bread, just bread. But before you criticize the crackers, why the wafer?
Also, Jesus gave it to His disciples and then commanded them to eat. He didn't pop it in their mouths.
FWIW, my church uses real bread. Not because it makes us holier than anyone else; it's just what we do. The important thing is to remember the Lord Jesus (Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:24-25).
Does it really matter to you what I believe about this? What do you believe? I believe I am correctly obeying Jesus command.So you believe I am obeying this command correctly?
Does it really matter to you what I believe about this? What do you believe? I believe I am correctly obeying Jesus command.
I knowHint, It is a question!
Blasphemy.
Heresy
Because they teach heresy, too!No, it was heretics who rejected this Christian orthodoxy. Tell me Batman, if the sacraments were a heresy, why didn't our Eastern Orthodox brothers ditch the theology of the sacraments when the great schism of Christianity occurred in the 11th century?
You are clearly after something else. I have explained to you clearly. I have answered your questions. I have expressed my beliefs. Now it is up to you to consider them and accept or reject them.Yes, this is a debate board. What people believe is what we debate. By doing this we test doctrines and beliefs, and learn what others believe. The reason it very much matters is because you said faith and doing what Jesus says to do is how one is saved. You claim The RCC is correct on all matters of biblical doctrine. If you believe this, and you have the truth of this matter, then you need to tell others if they might be doing something incorrectly and as a result may not be saved.
So please tell me, do you believe I am obeying this command correctly? If not, what must I do that I may obey it correctly and be saved?
I re-read your post, and I still think you are after something else. However, I wanted to say something specifically to Salvation. I think your view of it and mine are different. For me Salvation encapsulates our entire life culminating in heaven. Every decision and every action. Jesus said to his disciples that their righteousness must be greater than that of the Pharisees. Which to me means its not about lists but faith and living it out. Jesus restores our friendship with God and we live out that friendship. If we abandon that friendship the relationship breaks down. What I don't believe is that salvation is a once and done thing. We get our "faith" ticket stamped and getting to heaven is final which may or may not affect the rest of our life. Nor do I believe by following a bunch of lists while I have no faith or relationship with God. The things we do as Catholics maintain us our side of that relationship, God does his part by giving us the Holy Spirit and grace to guide us as we follow him. But if we don't have that relationship founded in faith to begin with those things don't really help but can condemn us. Like the passage in 1 Corinthians 11 says :" So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord"Yes, this is a debate board. What people believe is what we debate. By doing this we test doctrines and beliefs, and learn what others believe. The reason it very much matters is because you said faith and doing what Jesus says to do is how one is saved. You claim The RCC is correct on all matters of biblical doctrine. If you believe this, and you have the truth of this matter, then you need to tell others if they might be doing something incorrectly and as a result may not be saved.
So please tell me, do you believe I am obeying this command correctly? If not, what must I do that I may obey it correctly and be saved?
... I would see the relationship differently. We do not have a "friendship" with God restored through Christ, we have our relationship upgraded from "dead in sin" (Ephesians 2:1) "already judged" (John 3:18) "enemies of God" (Romans 5:10) to children of God (Romans 8:15). While this does not make it impossible for us to go astray, as the Prodigal Son went astray (Luke 15), I am confident that "he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion" (Philippians 1:6) and like the Prodigal Son, all of God's adopted children will eventually "come to their senses" (Luke 15:17) and return home to find the God waiting with open arms.If we abandon that friendship the relationship breaks down.
... really more about people turning the Table into a drunken party rather than a somber remembrance?Like the passage in 1 Corinthians 11 says :" So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord"
I re-read your post, and I still think you are after something else.
Maybe it will help if i tell you how I participate in the Lord's supper. About once a month in our service we take some broken crackers and some grape juice,
Broken crackers and grape juice? You are getting it wrong from the get go on that statement alone.
So the Grace of Calavary was not enough to cover and atone for all of our sins?Was spittle needed to heal the man’s eyes? Did Jesus really need to make mud? No, He didn’t. But He chose to. Just as He chose to give us the Sacraments as a channel of His Grace
isn't that the best way to understand the scriptures though?Spoken like a true literalist.
So the Grace of Calavary was not enough to cover and atone for all of our sins?
Point of clarification: "A channel" or "THE channel" of the Grace of Calvary?The sacraments are a channel of the Grace of Calvary.
None of the reformed or Baptists though would see them as being conduits of saving grace as Rome does!Never said thatI. The sacraments are a channel of the Grace of Calvary. Ask any Presbyterian, Anglican, Methodist, Catholic, Lutheran, Disciple of Christ, or Orthodox Christian.