Thinkingstuff said: Based on your questions it seems you want to jump topics once again!
The topic has been salvation ever since I asked the question about......wait for it....Salvation.
Thinkingstuff said: Your initial question was a simple one. "Can a Catholic tell me how to be saved" I answered that question directly and simply. "Yes believe on the Lord Jesus and do what he says."
Thinkingstuff said: You then say "that is not good enough" Totally, disregarding whether the statement was true or not, or even valid.
Correct, the statement is found very lacking and actually is either a dodge or just simply you do not know the answer. How could it be "good enough"? Example, I read this from Jesus, "And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:" Thus, from what read Jesus says to do, millions would have to be cutting off their hands and feet if they want to be saved, unless you are able to expound what the RCC (Phillip) considers "doing what Jesus says to do". Which is what I have been asking you to do, but you don't seem to know how to defend your answer. Now this is odd, since I have had Catholics point to the Ethiopian and Phillip exchange as proof the RCC is needed to explain anything Jesus said.
Thinkingstuff said: That makes me believe you don't really want the Catholic answer .
Really? I have been asking for the Catholic answer! I am representing the poor soul Ethiopian and you can't help me understand what I am reading! You just say "do what Jesus said to do". If I do that without the Catholic Church's guidance I will be chopping off my hands and feet! Because I do want life!
Thinkingstuff said: I responded that what Jesus said was pretty clear and didn't need any explanation but then asked what you thought he meant.
Is that what Phillip told the Ethiopian? 'Well it's pretty clear isn't it, what do you think it says'. 'Just eat His flesh and drink His blood, what is so difficult to understand?! '
Thinkingstuff said: Now you are bringing up another topic by saying "I only have the scripture I need a Catholic to tell me."
Lol. Another topic? This whole exchange is on the sole topic of how do Catholics answer the question of "what must i do to be saved?" Catholics say the Scripture is not sufficient for one to understand doctrine. So yes I do need the Catholic answers.
Thinkingstuff said: Ok. Using only scripture (which Catholics also use) explain to me what Jesus said. I gave you also scripture reference passages to help you. See, I don't think you really want to know.
This is classic! Catholics point to the Ethiopian and Phillip example as to why the RCC is necessary for understanding doctrines and you as a Catholic are telling me, representing the poor lost soul seeking salvation, to explain Scripture to you, or else he really doesn't want to know. It's not about me trying to get saved here. This is about the Catholic answer to the question to the lost soul who says, "what must I do to be saved?".
Thinkingstuff said: That is not productive. Ask the real questions you want to really address. Speak directly.
Lol. I am exactly where you have led us. All of my questions have been on the topic of salvation. You presented a partial list of things you said that Jesus said one must do to be saved. One was eat His flesh and drink His blood. The Ethiopian needs the Catholic understanding. How can he eat Jesus flesh and drink His blood? Does He need to find Jesus, kill Him, and eat and drink? The floor is yours, these are your replies, explain them Phillip!
As we can see, this dialogue has produced light on just how everyday Catholics respond to the basic question of salvation. We have at least three Catholics responding on here and the answers to this question are all over the map. Everything from living homeless, to just love people, to eating Jesus' flesh and drinking His blood. Yet they insist Christians need to seek the RCC where doctrine is spoken of in one voice!
The topic has been salvation ever since I asked the question about......wait for it....Salvation.
Thinkingstuff said: Your initial question was a simple one. "Can a Catholic tell me how to be saved" I answered that question directly and simply. "Yes believe on the Lord Jesus and do what he says."
Thinkingstuff said: You then say "that is not good enough" Totally, disregarding whether the statement was true or not, or even valid.
Correct, the statement is found very lacking and actually is either a dodge or just simply you do not know the answer. How could it be "good enough"? Example, I read this from Jesus, "And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:" Thus, from what read Jesus says to do, millions would have to be cutting off their hands and feet if they want to be saved, unless you are able to expound what the RCC (Phillip) considers "doing what Jesus says to do". Which is what I have been asking you to do, but you don't seem to know how to defend your answer. Now this is odd, since I have had Catholics point to the Ethiopian and Phillip exchange as proof the RCC is needed to explain anything Jesus said.
Thinkingstuff said: That makes me believe you don't really want the Catholic answer .
Really? I have been asking for the Catholic answer! I am representing the poor soul Ethiopian and you can't help me understand what I am reading! You just say "do what Jesus said to do". If I do that without the Catholic Church's guidance I will be chopping off my hands and feet! Because I do want life!
Thinkingstuff said: I responded that what Jesus said was pretty clear and didn't need any explanation but then asked what you thought he meant.
Is that what Phillip told the Ethiopian? 'Well it's pretty clear isn't it, what do you think it says'. 'Just eat His flesh and drink His blood, what is so difficult to understand?! '
Thinkingstuff said: Now you are bringing up another topic by saying "I only have the scripture I need a Catholic to tell me."
Lol. Another topic? This whole exchange is on the sole topic of how do Catholics answer the question of "what must i do to be saved?" Catholics say the Scripture is not sufficient for one to understand doctrine. So yes I do need the Catholic answers.
Thinkingstuff said: Ok. Using only scripture (which Catholics also use) explain to me what Jesus said. I gave you also scripture reference passages to help you. See, I don't think you really want to know.
This is classic! Catholics point to the Ethiopian and Phillip example as to why the RCC is necessary for understanding doctrines and you as a Catholic are telling me, representing the poor lost soul seeking salvation, to explain Scripture to you, or else he really doesn't want to know. It's not about me trying to get saved here. This is about the Catholic answer to the question to the lost soul who says, "what must I do to be saved?".
Thinkingstuff said: That is not productive. Ask the real questions you want to really address. Speak directly.
Lol. I am exactly where you have led us. All of my questions have been on the topic of salvation. You presented a partial list of things you said that Jesus said one must do to be saved. One was eat His flesh and drink His blood. The Ethiopian needs the Catholic understanding. How can he eat Jesus flesh and drink His blood? Does He need to find Jesus, kill Him, and eat and drink? The floor is yours, these are your replies, explain them Phillip!
As we can see, this dialogue has produced light on just how everyday Catholics respond to the basic question of salvation. We have at least three Catholics responding on here and the answers to this question are all over the map. Everything from living homeless, to just love people, to eating Jesus' flesh and drinking His blood. Yet they insist Christians need to seek the RCC where doctrine is spoken of in one voice!