No, as many would see it went much to far into inclusive language!Believe the latter.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No, as many would see it went much to far into inclusive language!Believe the latter.
The 1984 Niv superior to the revision, likewise the prior Nas versions superior to latest revision!Oh, yes, it's perfectly fine to place the 1984 edition on your list!
And your list agrees with my list, albeit I include the KJV on mine.
Have read itYep. Just as I said, you aren't familiar with the NET Bible.
Wonder why Lockman just did not decide to put time and money into the lsb instead of going their 2020 route?IMO, yes it is.
Yes, think 1978, and then 1984 revision, then 2005. and finally 2011!Just how many editions of the NIV has there been? Was there a 1970's New Testament Edition first?
Well said!superior to tghe revision, same way [rior Nas
They did bothWonder why Lockman just did not decide to put time and money into the lsb instead of going their 2020 route?
Think that they allowed the Lsb to do their work, but marketing and money was into the editionThey did both
I sincerely doubt it.Have read it
The NLT : 1996, 2004, 2007, 2013 and 2015.Yes, think 1978, and then 1984 revision, then 2005. and finally 2011!
I have have to say: you're top two are my top two.No particular order.
NASB95
ESV
NET
CSB
NIV
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
That guy from Kentucky sounds really smart....I think he is right. [emoji38]A friend of mine who pastors a reformed SBC church in Myrtle Beach likes the 1984 over the 2011, and doesn’t seem to be a fan of the 2011. Another friend of mine who pastors a reformed Baptist church in Kentucky thinks the 2011 is a huge upgrade over the 1984. So, I guess it’s the old adage, “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.”
On the American side of the Atlantic :
ASV :1901, 1929, 1952, 1971, 1989
The only thing I can think of from 1928 is the Book of Common Prayer. Coverdale's Translation?ASV 1901.
Who is 1928?.
1952 and 1971 RSV.
1989 NRSV.
Which goes back to the Revised Version.
Which goes back to the KJV.
Which goes back to the Bishops Bible, Geneva Bible, Great Bible, Matthews Bible, Coverdales Bible, William Tyndales pioneering, Original Transitions.
No. Goodspeed or maybe a modern language bible or something long out of print. Some minor translation. Suppose to be a continuation of the ASV somehow, or a revision of it.The only thing I can think of from 1928 is the Book of Common Prayer. Coverdale's Translation?
Perhaps this one?The only thing I can think of from 1928 is the Book of Common Prayer. Coverdale's Translation?
I think you're right. It's just that the year was 1924, not 1928.Perhaps this one?
1924. Helen Barrett Montgomery, The Centenary Translation of the New Testament. Philadelphia: The American Baptist Publication Society, 1924. A Baptist revision of the American Standard Version (1901), called "centenary" because it was published in commemoration of the centenary of the American Baptist Publication Society
20th Century English Versions
Which edition of the NIV?No particular order.
NASB95
ESV
NET
CSB
NIV