5 point Gillinist
Active Member
No, you're not a Hyles listener. Ok. What about the rest of my question?
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The True Gospel Preacher
- Thread starter KenH
- Start date
KJB1611reader
Active Member
Salvation bear fruit.
5 point Gillinist
Active Member
You don't think salvation results in fruit? You don't think the indwelling Holy Spirit transforms men ever increasingly to be more like Christ?
KJB1611reader
Active Member
If led by Spirit and in his word. But someone can be saved and not have fruits.
5 point Gillinist
Active Member
Where does the bible say that?
KJB1611reader
Active Member
Salvation is only by sole faith in gospel.
Nothing can change that, fruits and change life do not affect.
Layman
New Member
What are your thoughts on James 2?
KJB1611reader
Active Member
See Gene on YT.
5 point Gillinist
Active Member
Yeah. That is what I said. I then said salvation bears' fruit; the indwelling Holy Spirit received at salvation bears fruit through us. I didn't say that we bear fruit in order to be justified, I said those justified do bear fruit. Your answer has nothing to do with my original statement.
KJB1611reader
Active Member
No, salvation dosen't mean will bear fruit.
5 point Gillinist
Active Member
Ok. Again. Where does the bible say that believers won't bear fruit? If you deny that the bible (even the KJV) says believers do bear fruit, then you are the one denying the scripture.
Layman
New Member
Gene Kim teaches that the book of James is written to Jews in the future after the rapture takes place. Is that what you believe, and have you considered an alternate interpretation?
Last edited:
37818
Well-Known Member
What Jesus proclaimed was finished in John 19:30 was completed before John 19:28, per, . . . . Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, . . . .
KJB1611reader
Active Member
Yes.
Layman
New Member
So you are saying that the book of James is irrelevant to Christians today. Where in the text does it indicate that it’s only for a future application and have most Christians been wasting their time studying it for the last 2,000 years?
Last edited: