1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Human State at birth?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by 12strings, Feb 29, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    Amy, we are just like Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve were made upright, and Ecc 7:29 says all men are made upright.

    When Adam and Eve sinned, they spiritually died right then and there. They did not physically die until centuries later.

    When Adam and Eve believed God's promise to send a Saviour they were saved, God then took skins and covered them representing the righteousness imputed to us. Now they were alive AGAIN.

    Here is the promise made to Adam and Eve.

    Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

    Here is Adam and Eve being covered by the skins. Blood had to be shed.

    Gen 3:21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.

    How do we know Adam and Eve believed the promise? It is shown in the next chapter.

    Gen 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.

    Eve was mistaken, but she believed Cain came from God and was the promised Saviour. She had faith in God's promise. When they believed they were made spiritually alive again. However, their body was still under the curse and they died physically many years later as we all do.

    "In Adam" is said only once in all the scriptures (1 Cor 15:22). This entire chapter is speaking of the physical resurrection of our bodies, not spiritual. All men are "in Adam" physically and all die, even innocent babies.

    Being born of Adam does not separate you from God, sinning separates you from God.

    Isa 59:2 But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.

    How can our sins separate us from God if we are born separated from God because of Adam's sin?
     
  2. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    The prodical son returned home, correct? How could he return home if he wasn't there to begin with?

    The father said this, my son, is alive again. How could he be alive again if he was spiritually dead from birth?

    Unless you believe in a fall from grace(which I am sure you don't), then being born spiritually dead is not plausible, IMHO.
     
  3. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    I think the story of the prodigal is speaking of God's redemption of mankind, not an individual. Mankind (Adam) was once pure, but no longer is and must be redeemed.

    No I don't believe that, but you seem to be saying that when you say that one is "in Christ" at birth, but later he is lost and needs to be saved. :confused:
     
  4. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Right again: we were kept under the law,
    But the scripture hath concluded all under sin,

    But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, To redeem them that were under the law,

    Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that hangeth on a tree:

    For he hath made him sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
     
  5. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    It doesn't say "all men". It says "man"

    Ecclesiastes 7:29 Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions.

    'adam aw-dawm'
    from 119; ruddy i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.):--X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.


    In this context, it means "mankind". Adam was made upright. We are made like fallen Adam. Why did Mary have to be a virgin to bear God's Son?
     
  6. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Me thinks there were two sons. The prodigal was the house of Israel whom God had given a bill divorce the other was the house of Judah who was in the land when Jesus of the tribe of Judah was born in the land as one of his own. Judah still had the identifying sign as the people of God the others had turned their backs on the law of God and had been scattered among the nations by God and were considered Gentiles. There was no more a remembrance of them among men. Deut 32:26 I said, I would scatter them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among men:

    That could not mean the house of Judah the Jews, everyone in all nations have always known who they are.

    Have they not???
     
  7. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    No Amy, the word "they" is plural and points directly to the word "man" showing this is speaking of all men, not just Adam.

    Again, the word "they" shows this is speaking of all men.

    And the reason Jesus was born of a virgin was to be a sign. NEVER in the scriptures does it say Jesus had to be born of a virgin to escape a sin nature. In fact, Jesus got his ability to be tempted from Mary his mother, as God the Father cannot be tempted. But Jesus was able to be tempted.

    Isa 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

    Jesus being born of a virgin was a sign, it proved he was born of God. If Mary had not been a virgin, then no one would have believed Jesus was the Son of God, they would have believed him the son of Joseph.

    And virgins are just as sinful as everyone else. Sin is not spread physically or through lust as Augustine believed. It is not passed through the blood. Sin is a moral issue, not physical.

    If we sin because we receive a sin nature physically, then we are not to blame for our sin, anymore than a person who inherits a disease or disorder from their parents would be guilty.

    Believeing sin is passed physically is nothing but pure superstition.
     
  8. Cypress

    Cypress New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well said once again.
     
  9. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Distinction without a difference.
     
  10. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    ...except Paul never says that, he states plainly "I died". James 1:15 attests to this. You have bought the reformers excuse for this verse hook, line and sinker. At any rate guilt is associated with consciously violating God's law, so your interpretation still supports my understanding that spiritual death occurrs via consciously violating God's law.

    Um...like you and I right this moment? ;)
    Hardly. I'm still going to die physically. I still sin. So do you. Creation is still groaning waiting for redemption. We are ultimately freed from the curse, but we most definitely still under it until glorification.
     
    #150 webdog, Mar 7, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 7, 2012
  11. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    "Man" is still singular. The "they" refers to those that come after Adam.
     
  12. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Not in context. "Species, mankind" in Amy's definiton is what applies.
     
  13. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    Baloney. Here is John Wesley's commentary:
    John Wesley was an Arminian.


    Galatians 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:

    No. We are not under the curse of sin. We have been freed from it. Our bodies will die, but our spirit is freed from the curse and our bodies will be redeemed at the resurrection.
     
  14. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Missed the memo where he is the authority on original sin. FTR, the majority of cal's and non erroneously hold to Augustinianism, a holdover from the RCC.
    ...and Arminians also err.
    Curse of the law is now the same as the curse of sin? :confused: Do tell how our bodies still die if we have been freed from this curse?

    “And as it is appointed unto
    men once to die, but after
    this the judgment”

    Sure sounds like the curse of death (result of sin) still reigns to me.
     
    #154 webdog, Mar 7, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 7, 2012
  15. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    You said I had fallen hook, line and sinker for Calvnism and I have proven to you that it's not just Cals that hold this view.

    Please stop insulting me.
     
  16. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Going to bed...so Amy doesn't have to wait all night :)
     
  17. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    It's not an insult, you brought out the one angle they (you) think explains Paul's straight forward explanation of Romans 7 that does enormous damage to Augustinianism if taken the way Paul intended for it to be taken.
     
  18. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    eccl7, james 1 romans 7....do not adress the issue at hand. they are describing sin of all mankind in the course of a lifetime...not its origin...

    once again In Adam all sinned...all died.....if you get that wrong ...you will get all the verses wrong...because you are not looking where God's word points to.
     
  19. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28

    See? I told you you were going reformed!! That's one of their catch phrases!! :laugh::wavey::love2::D

    J/K Sissy!! Even if you do go reformed, I'll still call you Sissy!! It'll be RSissy then....
     
  20. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28

    I believe this to be an example of God's redeeming those who choose to believe. You can't return home, if you weren't @ home to begin with.



    You may, or may not, buy this, but here goes. When we are born into this world, we are born spiritually alive. In this state, we are under God's grace. In this Grace is Jesus' blood. When a child sins, it does not know it is sinning before God, therefore God does not hold them accountable for it. Now, when the time comes that they knowingly, and willingly, sin before Him, He then accounts/imputes sin unto them, and are no longer under His grace.

    Take for instance, a three year old child takes a .38 pistol and accidently shoots and kills their mother. Did they kill? Yes? Was it intentional? No. If this went to trial, would this 3 y/o be found guilty? No. Why? They didn't know the ramifications of playing with that .38 to start with. Same way I believe God sees us. It's the intent, that makes us guilty or not. An infant that lies, does so to keep from having a "warm bum-bum", and does not realize the ramifications of this sin before God Almighty.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...