1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Most Evil Person in American History

Discussion in 'History Forum' started by saturneptune, Dec 12, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    You cannot OBEY these two commands and SUPPORT the slaughter of the unborn. I question if anyone can SUPPORT the slaughter of the unborn and LOVE God!
     
  2. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You cannot keep those commands and have slavery as it was practiced in the USA.

    Now since you seem to be saying there is nothing wrong with slavery as long as the master treats the slaves well, that must mean that you do not disapprove of "White Slavery" as long as the pimp treats his women well. After all scripture says nothing about White Slavery.

    So you are saying your would not mind being treated as a slave?

    Again, so if you are treated well, you would not mind being a slave?



    Not as practiced in the USA. Slaves in that time were not sold as property in the marketplace. They were not hunted as free folk were hunted in Africa.

    Slavery at that time was very different than what was practiced here.

    Human mistreatment towards other humankind has also been a part of the fabric from the time Cain slew Able.

    Paul's actions doe not mean God approved.

    Treat others as you want to be treated. Do you want to be treated as slave?



    But not bought and sold as property.

    True and in the Slave Narratives there are those who said they had good masters. But that did not mean they liked being slaves and did not mean they approved of slavery.


    I would say that ill treatment was the norm.

    Sorry, I have no idea wht you are saying in his sentence.


    Love your neighbor as yourself. You cannot hold a person in bondagae and at the same time love him/her.
     
    #362 Crabtownboy, Jan 19, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 19, 2014
  3. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You have no doubt confused obedience to the commands with inability to have total authority over another person's welfare and duties.

    They do not.

    Not all slavery "as it was practiced in the USA" was brutal and hurtful.

    "Property" is to increase in value. If one harms the "property" the value diminishes. Slave holders were businessmen.

    According to the historical documentation (some of what I put on line in video form) shows that ill treatment was not brutal and hurtful in the vast majority of the south.

    Thomas (Stonewall) Jackson owned (if I recall correctly) about 6 to 9 slaves. Look at the link I provided and see his conduct toward those in whom he had charge as well as his reputation among the slaves.

    Totally not the question.

    The question: Is slavery condemned in the Scriptures as evil?

    What I would or would not is not part of deciding what is right and what is evil.

    Feelings have very little to do with what is right and wrong in the sight of God.

    Again, doesn't matter.

    The question: Is slavery condemned in the Scriptures by God as being evil.


    Again, doesn't matter.

    The question: Is slavery condemned in the Scriptures by God as being evil.

    Doesn't matter.

    There is no statement that God disproved the actions and statements of Paul.

    Fact is, that Paul's letters are part of the Scriptures, it would show all the more that God did in fact approve.

    Doesn't matter what I "feel."

    What matters is what the Scriptures state.

    There has been no Scriptures showing that Slavery is evil and not Scriptural.

    The treatment is certainly regulated and the Scriptures do speak very specifically about that issue.

    But the Scriptures do not condemn slavery as evil.

    Doesn't matter. Again, you seem to base what is right and wrong upon what feelings are attached.

    There are any number of things that happen to people they may rather not have happen.

    The question: Is slavery condemned in the Scriptures as evil.

    Sure, you can "say it" but it has no factual foundation. I can just as well make the claim that the slaves were treated very well in comparison to the living conditions of those left in their original homeland. Certainly, the Hebrews had no desire to be enslaved - but they were.

    But the real question remains: Is there Scriptural proof that slavery is condemned as evil.




    That is merely your own feelings.

    There are no prerequisites nor conditions that must be met or the command is disavowed.

    The basic question remains: Does Scripture condemn slavery as evil.

    The answer - no.

    Certainly, the ill treatment of a slave is condemned, but not the condition, itself.

    But look carefully at what Paul states in Ephesians 6:
    5 Slaves, be obedient to those who are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in the sincerity of your heart, as to Christ; 6 not by way of eye service, as men-pleasers, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart. 7 With good will render service, as to the Lord, and not to men, 8 knowing that whatever good thing each one does, this he will receive back from the Lord, whether slave or free.
    See, it isn't slavery is evil; rather, it is that the treatment needed to meet a certain level of expectation both by the slaver holder and the slave.
     
    #363 agedman, Jan 19, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 19, 2014
  4. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So you are saying that women kidnapped, as slaves were, and forced into prostitution must obey their masters and if they do not they deserve to be punished.

    After all scripture says noting about kidnapping women and forcing them into prostitution. So, you see nothing wrong with that.

    In fact, you are saying it was all right for anyone to kidnap anyone and make them a slave?
     
    #364 Crabtownboy, Jan 19, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 19, 2014
  5. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Obviously, You can't do it.

    You cannot show by the clear, plain teaching of Scriptures or Scriptural principle that Slavery is evil.

    I am not disputing that evil treatment of slaves is not evil. Such just is not a part of the basic issue.

    The claim on this thread is that slavery is evil. I have challenged that view. I expect those who contend for that view to show BY SCRIPTURES the proof that God condemns slavery as evil.

    Anecdotal examples of ill treatment has little to do with the basic question proclaiming the institution of slavery, evil, anymore than me posting good treatment demonstrates that God approves of slavery.

    I posted a passage in Ephesians.

    It concerned the treatment.

    It did not condemn the institution.

    Btw, kidnapping and forced prostitution is most certainly condemned in Scriptures. The ONLY exception is the conditions of one army winning in battle or capturing a city. They Scripturally took as God authorized without condemnation.
     
    #365 agedman, Jan 19, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 19, 2014
  6. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    In Rome they fought to the death in the circus!



    You cannot abort a child and at the same time love him/her.
     
  7. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist

    I do not see what that has to do with the evil of slavery as practiced in America.
     
  8. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You just negated your entire argument supporting slavery as practiced in America. All the original slaved had been kidnapped.
     
  9. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    28,745
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Folks, the good ol boys continue to post slander and fiction.

    The South was pro-slavery.

    The South seceded before Lincoln took office.

    The South Confederate Vice President said slavery was the cause of the split.

    The SBC split from the unified Baptists over slavery, rejecting the view that slave ownership made them less than followers of Jesus.

    The South fired on Fort Sumter, initiating the hostilities.

    The good ol boys falsely claim Lincoln did not care about slavery, but he opposed expansion of slavery into the territories.

    Slavery, as practiced in the South was cruel, sinful, vulgar, abusive and mean. The more than 3 million slaves held captive in the South were being beaten, chained, raped, castrated, and murdered.
     
  10. ktn4eg

    ktn4eg New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    4
    Is not true that the so-called "Great Emanicipater" [Abraham Lincoln] did not free any slaves in the South that were under the occupation of the Union armies in the Confederate States' areas by his "Emancipation Proclamation"?

    Is it also not true that President Lincoln did nothing to free the slaves in the northern "Border States" (e.g., Maryland, Delaware) that did not secede from the Union?
     
  11. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Just contradicting your argument about slavery in the USA with slavery in History!
     
  12. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    You got any evidence showing that the "war monger" Lincoln did those noble acts?
     
  13. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Read the Emancipation Proclamation. It had no effect on occupied territory in the South, only behind the battle lines.
     
  14. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Okay lets look at them
    Just to amuse us, please list the dates of succession of each State/Commowealth
    What is a "South Confederate VP?

    1) Baptists - Unified - good joke
    2) Have no ideal what you are talking about
    (you dont really know SBC history - do you)
    1) After a legal govt said they were no longer welcome
    2) Have you researched the other actions prior to Sumter.

    What was more inportant to Lincoln - A) saving the Union or B) freeing the slaves - Reference please

    As stated, yes there was cruel treatment of slaves,
    But answer this - how many slaves stayed on the plantation after the War of Northern Agression ended?

    Van - you have evaded just about every VALID question asked of you.

    But please answer this question:
    Do you condone Shermans March to the Sea?
    A simple yes or no will do

    IF you can not answer these question - oh well.....
     
  15. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    You are mistaken! Read post #105! Just to save you the trouble I will repost the EP!

     
  16. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    One more time CTB in case you missed it!
     
  17. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Slavery in the US was very different than in Biblical times. There was no industry where people went out to kidnap free people and sell them into slavery. There was no wholesale ripping husbands and wives from each other and selling them to different owners. The same for children. There were no plantations with hundreds of slaves.

    In Europe slavery was replaced by serfdom. By 1000 a.d. there were no slaves left in Europe. Bathilde, queen of the Franks outlawed slavery of Christians. Slave trade was abolished in England in 1102. By the 11th century canon law lawyers had decreed that slavery was contrary to being a Christian.

    How can you defend an institution that lowered people to that of being bought and sold like hogs?
     
  18. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Like professional athletes?
     
  19. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist


    You have produced no documentation to show "Slavery in the US was very different than in Biblical times." That is merely an assumption on your part. The conditions of one becoming a slave does not void what the Scriptures allow or not.

    The Israeli's were told to take by force and make slaves as they entered the land. And so did every army of the world until the mid 1800's when a people were conquered.

    Taken from Antebellum slavery:

    The standard image of Southern slavery is that of a large plantation with hundreds of slaves. In fact, such situations were rare. Fully 3/4 of Southern whites did not even own slaves; of those who did, 88% owned twenty or fewer. Whites who did not own slaves were primarily yeoman farmers. Practically speaking, the institution of slavery did not help these people.
    In the lower South the majority of slaves lived and worked on cotton plantations. Most of these plantations had fifty or fewer slaves, although the largest plantations have several hundred.

    The article goes on to discuss the ill treatment of slaves - but that is not in contention and is recognized by all believers as totally ungodly.

    Personally, I find slavery abhorrent. What I am attempting to show is that my feelings alone doesn't make slavery evil. Nor does it allow for the North to assume some standard of righteousness to invade the south and cause the death of so very very many.




    You are wrong on your dating, and drawing some fairly inaccurate conclusions.

    Look at this documentation: Why Slavery was finally abolished in the British Empire.




    You have YET to answer the basic question and show Slavery was condemned as evil in the Scriptures.

    Until one is able to clearly demonstrate proof of that issue the rest of the arguments are totally secondary.

    Again no one is arguing as to HOW, or the TREATMENT being evil or not. The Scriptures clearly take on that issue and make very clear statements about each.

    However, it is consistently the view of some posters on this thread that the Civil War was fought over slavery.

    They present the claim as if the war was then fought from a morally superior position.

    However, IF the posters CANNOT show slavery is condemned in the Scriptures as evil, then it follows that the North were the aggressors and were totally unrighteous and at fault for all deaths of the war.
     
  20. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64


    In the US slaves were not acquired for the purpose of killing each other to entertain the masses. FYI the circus was the arena in Rome where the gladiators fought!

    The blacks sold into slavery were either taken by another tribe or by Muslims and sold to the traders!

    Yes and you and the democrat party are well on the way to establish serfdom in this country!
    That is untrue CTB. You need to check your facts. Slave trade was not abolished by Great Britian until:
    Crabbie you are a pathetic hypocrite. I have never defended slavery. You are deliberately lying when you say I have. If you can find one place on this thread or this Forum where I defend slavery I will apologize to you.

    That being said you are an unethical hypocrite. You accuse me of defending slavery while at the same time you are supporting the practice of slaughtering the unborn. It is simply because of people like you who call themselves Christians that 55,000,000 children have been slaughtered. The practice still continues and you are still WHINING about something that was abolished 150 years ago. Have ypo no conscience? Have you no shame. I see no evidence of it. I hope that God can. But IMO you are an affront and disgrace to the ONE who died for you!.
     
    #380 OldRegular, Jan 20, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 20, 2014
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...