Did Billy Graham do More Harm Than Good to the Church?

You obviously didn't watch the video.
Later in his life, Billy Grahams heart for sinners became obvious. He wanted to see as many people in heaven and as few people in Hell as possible. As my link confirms, he never compromised his message of salvation. He sincerely hoped Gods mercy is broader than we understand it but he never changed his message of The Cross.

Watched my link yet?

 

You watched the link yet?
Billy was not a Calvinist. You saying non Calvinists are not Christians? Say what you mean. Quit beating around the Bush. You have already said Graham was not a Christian. Are all Non-Cals lost?

 

How? They would believe in "decisionalism not Christianity."

 

You watch my link? Graham obviously knew who saved him.

 

Again. Did you watch the link I provided?

 

When Did Graham's Compromise Begin?

 

I agree with whoever said we should leave Grahams judgement/reward to God.

 

I don't believe that Graham was syncretistic in any matter unless it was for associating generally with many others who were not SBC. I think that Graham stayed true to his doctrinal beliefs.

Camp Chesterfield near Indianapolis is a major spiritualist/spiritism installation and they picketed Graham on his last crusade in Indianapolis in 1999, which astonished me. No one can please the world.

 

The praise of Billy Graham indicates something that is think is a serious problem in Christianity : pragmatism. The fact that he won people to Christ does not mean that he did do a lot of harm to the cause of Christ. Who knows how many people were confused and mislead by his intimate association with apostate and his heretical statements, some of which have been posted already.

And while yes Jesus ate with publicans and sinners, he did not however yoke together with Pharisees and Sadducees or send them into the cities to preach alongside his disciples. Shame on anyone who uses the example of Jesus to defend Billy Graham’s compromises.

 

Please give a little respect for the dead Brian.

Wait a few days before condemnation of the man.

 

How could Billy Graham kept anyone out of the heaven if the doctrine of election is true?

 

One thing that comes up almost immediately in such a discussion is Calvinism. I can testify that I heard opposition to Billy Graham from missionary Baptists who also opposed Calvinism, long before I had ever seen a Baptist Calvinist. These folks thought Graham's message was weak (not heretical), his methods (decoys, repeat-after-me prayers, etc.) were misguided, and his alliances were ecumenical (and all of this long before his Robert Schuller interview, at which time, btw, he was 79 years old).

All this just to say that opposition to Billy Graham was not merely a Pro-Calvinism versus Anti-Calvinism divide.

 

I have also had some misgivings about some of the strategies but I still think it is a little ghoulish to go after the man before he is even buried.

 

He was the public picture of large local churches that were involved in the crusade long before the meetings, The local believers were leading the decision makers to Christ on the floor while he was on the podium., He was asking for decisions, to come forward, which is most difficult. The local leaders were to continue discipleship for these new believers when the crusade was over.

It was the same as the "tent meetings" just larger.

There is a mission state at their site,