Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
IF God relied upon "free will" to get any lost sinner saved, we would all be choosing to say hell bound, as better for us to be our own "god" then want God to have to save us!The idea that it is the will of man that chooses whether or not to be saved is false.
The Idea of Free Will
You need to look no further than John chapter 1. It states that it is not the will of the flesh but of God.
For example, if I quote this:
" For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." ( John 3:16 ).
It has just as much "weight" as this:
" The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity." ( Psalms 5:5 ).
This is the point the other side overlooks. It is the will of no man to follow God. Paul is explicit about this.IF God relied upon "free will" to get any lost sinner saved, we would all be choosing to say hell bound, as better for us to be our own "god" then want God to have to save us!
IF God relied upon "free will" to get any lost sinner saved, we would all be choosing to say hell bound, as better for us to be our own "god" then want God to have to save us!
No that is not true.Saying that salvation occurred after belief is just the standard arguing of semantics.
No proof just jabberYou do.
1. God chose before time began that Iconoclast would be saved.
2. Since God had already chosen Iconoclast to be saved, Iconoclast had to believe. There was no choice made by Iconoclaust.
3. Sometime after this Iconoclast is saved. (Not really wanting to quibble over something as silly as regeneration before or after belief or other stupid stuff.)
Regardless, all Calvinists believe that the choice by God to save them has occurred before belief. Saying that salvation occurred after belief is just the standard arguing of semantics.
There is a ship sinking and the Coast Guard makes the choice to save them.
No proof just jabber
MB
You are missing the point. It was not the choice of the people on the ship to save, it was the choice of the Coast guard.The Coast Guard is not a god which has predetermined the future. A Coast Guard's "choice" to save a ship may or may not save it. But the decision by the Calvinist God before the beginning of time to save someone always saves that person.
So, the decision by the Calvinist God will effectively save the person prior to the person believing.
No that is not true.
There is a ship sinking and the Coast Guard makes the choice to save them. Did salvation happen at the moment of choice? Of course not. It happened when they were actually rescued.
This is yet another blasphemous strawman.From eternity past the "coast guard" knew that sinking ship, HECK it fired the torpedo. And follows its scheduled plan of mock rescue and kill the rest.
There is no way to sugar coat such a pathetic and evil view of God.
Its like if you took offense that an ant in your ant farm sneezed.
You are missing the point. It was not the choice of the people on the ship to save, it was the choice of the Coast guard.
In the same way it is not our choice to have God save us. He already chose to save us and perfectly accomplishes that.
No that is not correct. You are not saved until you are saved.However, my point of contention is that when the Calvinist God makes the decision before the beginning of time, the person in effect is already saved before he or she is even born.
what part I got wrong?This is yet another blasphemous strawman.
You are comparing the Coast Guard in the illustration to what Calvinists say are God and you totally misrepresent everything we believe.what part I got wrong?
You are comparing the Coast Guard in the illustration to what Calvinists say are God and you totally misrepresent everything we believe.
We do not believe God sabatoged the unbelievers. We do not beleive he mocks them.
The god you describe is not the God of the Bible, not the God of Calvinists and you should be ashamed of yourself.