Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Covid 19![]()
Again,
Jesus says to him, "Am I with you so long a time, and you have not known Me, Philip? The one having seen Me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'?Never said they were the same person, yet they are for there is ONE God, is there not?
Like I posted early, the trinity really cannot be contain in human reasoning, and exampled by human descriptions.
You said, "In the Revelation, the God (Father) Lord (Jesus) are shown as two, co equal along with the seven Spirits of God". This says to anyone who understands English, that God the Father and Jesus Christ are TWO, and then there are SEVEN SPIRITS, which makes NINE! You take the "seven Spirits" to mean "SEVEN HOLY SPIRITS", which is not correct. There is only ONE Person The Holy Spirit
I suggest that you start a new thread on what you believe the Trinity to be, as this one is to show that Jesus Christ is THE Creator, as are the Father and Holy Spirit.
And this is not essentially what I wrote?This is not correct. The word Elohim is masculine plural, which is because GOD is a PLURALITY of PERSONS, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The use of the PLURAL in verse 26, for example, is because God is a PLURALITY of PERSONS, and The Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit, are CREATORS. As is seen in the PLURAL "CREATORS" in Ecc. 12:1, and MAKERS in Isaiah, etc
Really? You are you saying the Lord Jesus Christ didn’t say it, didn’t mean what was said, was presenting a myth, was exaggerating, or what?Not LITERALLY!
Okay, then why do you insist on using the name, YHWY, in an unbiblical manner?
I know.No, he is Second person of Godhead
Okay, then why do you insist on using the name, YHWY, in an unbiblical manner?
Only one of the names. But we know the trinity by the revelation of the NT, so even though one could speak of YHWH the Son, it is rightfully used alone in reference to God, the three Persons collectively, or of the Person of the Father.YHWH is the NAME of the God of the Bible. It is used in the Bible for The Three Members of the Trinity
it is rightfully used alone in reference to God
Your theology seems to be questionable.the theology of Van, and some others here, especially their Christology, is questionable, as they have this warped idea, that somehow God the Father is the "Primary" Member in the Godhead. This is theological nonsense, which was pushed by the early Church heretic, Origen, and adopted by many of the Orthodox Church Fathers, as do some even today.
John 1:3 - All things came to be by means of Him
and apart from Him came to be not even one thing
which has come to be.
The Second Person of the Trinity accomplishes the purpose and plans of the First Person of the Trinity through the power of the Third Person of the Trinity.
Collectively, as I said, as we know through the NT. But you will find nowhere the Son alone, or the Spirit alone, is called YHWH.God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, are ALL equally called YHWH in the OT!
Collectively, as I said, as we know through the NT. But you will find nowhere the Son alone, or the Spirit alone, is called YHWH.
Your theology seems to be questionable.
Did Van say or suggest the Father is the "Primary" Member in the Godhead? Nope.
What did Van say?
Anyone who denies this truth needs to be specific. The Trinity doctrine is "One God in Three Persons.
Only one of the names. But we know the trinity by the revelation of the NT, so even though one could speak of YHWH the Son, it is rightfully used alone in reference to God, the three Persons collectively, or of the Person of the Father.
Personal Incredulity (the "taint so" absurdity) is a fallacious argument.you said,. "The Second Person of the Trinity accomplishes the purpose and plans of the First Person of the Trinity"
This is UNBIBLICAL subordinationism!
Personal Incredulity (the "taint so" absurdity) is a fallacious argument.
John 10:18
“No one has taken it away from Me, but I lay it down on My own. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it back. This commandment I received from My Father.”
John 10:37
“If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me;