You do not believe in an actual atonement rather a potential atonement which scripture knows nothing about.If you were a confessional person you would not struggle as much as you do.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Moving away from Doctrine? Maturity or Apostasy?
- Thread starter Iconoclast
- Start date
- Status
Not necessarily.
Christ did die for "the human family" (all men). But Christ also died to save only those who believe.
I think it is important to clarify the "for" part.
Also, we need to acknowledge that Scripture never speaks of someone as elect except they are saved (e g., Scripture never says so and so is elect so they will believe at some point in the future).
I only make note of this because we often do speak in those terms, and it can sometimes be a cause of miscommunication.
Spiritual maturity is indeed a good thing.
I hope you spiritual wondering ends well.
I personally see warning signs and danger in what you post, but do not think you want to hear that.
For you to suggest Calvinism is built on secular philosophy is not only laughable but demonstrates to me you have never had a real grasp on the teaching, the biblical base of it, and it's place in biblical worldview.
You do not understand the law and the judgment of God.As you are coming after the truth head-on it shows a multitude of examples described in the OP.
This post is so far from truth..It replaces Satan with God????Seriously!
JonC,
From my point of view you have been drifting in a bad direction, but you see it as maturing.
I always believe that errors concerning the fall lead to a series of errors.
What I have observed is that pattern of error in what you call maturing.
You are wrong on spiritual death at the fall
You are wrong on the doctrines of grace.
You are wrong on Penal Substituionary Atonement.
You are wrong on God's law.
You are wrong on God's punishment being answered by the work of the mediator.
You of course believe I am the one in error.
You believe all the Reformers, Puritans, and present day Calvinists are all wrong.
Now it is your right to openly express you beliefs and feelings.
It is our right also to consider such statements and attacks as they are offered.
Your posts fit a pattern I have seen in my life, and in each case it did not end well.
Perhaps it will work out better for you.
I was not going to offer these ideas until I read these additional posts. I feel I need to offer this in an attempt to point out what appears to me to be a wrong turn.
From my point of view you have been drifting in a bad direction, but you see it as maturing.
I always believe that errors concerning the fall lead to a series of errors.
What I have observed is that pattern of error in what you call maturing.
You are wrong on spiritual death at the fall
You are wrong on the doctrines of grace.
You are wrong on Penal Substituionary Atonement.
You are wrong on God's law.
You are wrong on God's punishment being answered by the work of the mediator.
You of course believe I am the one in error.
You believe all the Reformers, Puritans, and present day Calvinists are all wrong.
Now it is your right to openly express you beliefs and feelings.
It is our right also to consider such statements and attacks as they are offered.
Your posts fit a pattern I have seen in my life, and in each case it did not end well.
Perhaps it will work out better for you.
I was not going to offer these ideas until I read these additional posts. I feel I need to offer this in an attempt to point out what appears to me to be a wrong turn.
SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
In 1 John 2:2, is says of Jesus Christ, "He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world". "propitiation", is the Greek noun "ἱλασμός", which literally means, "a means of appeasing"
Isaiah 53 clearly says that Jesus Christ was "stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted...Yet it was the will of the LORD to crush him; He has put Him to grief" (4, 10)
2 Cor. 5:21, "For He (the Father) hath made Him (Jesus Christ) to be sin for (ὑπέρ, instead of, on our behalf) us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him"
Galatians 3:13, "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for (ὑπέρ, instead of, on our behalf) us—for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree”
All very clear to me, that the Bible does teach Penal Substitutionary Atonement!
SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
The very fact, that 1, God loves the entire human race with a Saving Love (John 3:16-18); and, 2, that the Good News is to be Preached to every human being (Mark 16:15), and 3, that only those who repent and believe will be saved (Mark 1:15); clearly shows that the Death of Jesus Christ can ONLY be POTENTIAL.
He was moving toward true doctrine. "Doctrine" is just a fancy word for "teaching."
I would say you're very self-righteous if not fearful.
No. You are now speaking of who Christ is (you are lifting parts of Scripture and taking them out of context).
Christ is the Propitiation for the sins of the World. In Him we escape the wrath to come.
Penal Substitution Theory cannot be made a biblical for tribe because it is the opposite of what Scripture teaches.
Per the Bible Christ suffered and died at the hands of the powers of evil, God vindicated Him, He gained bigotry over those powers for us and liberated us from slavery.
He is now the Propitiation for the sins of man, all Judgment has been given Him, He is our Mediator, and our High Priest.
I do understand the Law, God's law, and the Judgement of God. Scripture is clear on this.
The issue is that you are looking at tradition and not Scripture itself.
Penal Substitution Theory does put God in the place of Satan when it comes to the cross. But the reason is Penal Substitution Theory adopts tge corrupt view of the Law we were warned against in Isaiah. They assume the part of the Jewish leaders crying "crucify".
No. I understand Calvinism (most likely better than you). I studied it, believed it, and taught it for years.
But God continues to teach His disciples. God convicted me of an error in Calvinism and showed me it was secularism.
I could not make Calvinism stand after this.
The Holy Spirit works in the lives of believers. I don't think poorly of Calvinists. They are at a stage in their walk where they may need the philosophy. The gospel still shines through, even through the error.
We see more Reformed churches being led out of the error of Penal Substitution Theory. Perhaps God is leading them to reform Reformed Theology.
But growth here depends on God as the believer matures.
We hold the same faith, and over time and prayerful study you may very well grow in your walk enough to leave what is false of Calvinism behind while keeping what is true.
Thank you. I pray the same for you.
I do get what you are saying. A few years ago I would have told others who God revealed the truth the exact same thing.
I know you post from the heart and mean it for my benefit. And I appreciate that.
But you are where I once was. God led me away from Calvinism by showing me an error. There is no turning back. I hope to meet you someday on this common ground.
1] false
2]true
3]false
You identify your own problem,or show why you are in error.
Jesus said....it is finished!
He did not say...it is potential,you just have to add to it.
If the saving love were universal all would be saved.
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Crushing sure sounds like pain is involved.
The Jewish people and their leaders who shouted "crucify!" and also the Romans had the exactly same purpose as God: the death of the Lord Jesus Christ.
"For truly, against Your holy Servant Jesus who You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate with the Gentiles and the people of Israel gathered together to do whatever Your hand and Your purpose determined before to be done." Quite unwittingly they were following the will of God.
The difference of course is described in Genesis 50:20. "But as for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, in order to bring it about as it is this day, to save many people alive."
With respect to this, Joseph had no hesitation in describing the sufferings inflicted upon him as coming from God. "So now it was not you who sent me here, but God" (Genesis 45:8). Now strictly speaking it was neither the brothers nor God who got Joseph to Egypt but the Ishmaelite traders, but Joseph recognizes the guiding hand of God and ascribes the whole thing to Him just as Isaiah does in Isaiah 53:10.
"For truly, against Your holy Servant Jesus who You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate with the Gentiles and the people of Israel gathered together to do whatever Your hand and Your purpose determined before to be done." Quite unwittingly they were following the will of God.
The difference of course is described in Genesis 50:20. "But as for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, in order to bring it about as it is this day, to save many people alive."
With respect to this, Joseph had no hesitation in describing the sufferings inflicted upon him as coming from God. "So now it was not you who sent me here, but God" (Genesis 45:8). Now strictly speaking it was neither the brothers nor God who got Joseph to Egypt but the Ishmaelite traders, but Joseph recognizes the guiding hand of God and ascribes the whole thing to Him just as Isaiah does in Isaiah 53:10.
Silverhair
Well-Known Member
Do you no longer trust what the bible says? Don't you still hold to Sola Scriptura? You have just denied clear scripture.
How are you going to twist these words?
This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself as a ransom for all, the testimony given at the proper time. 1Ti 2:3-6 NASB
To understand what Christ Jesus meant when He said "it is finished" we just have to look back a few verses. "After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished, to fulfill the Scripture" Joh 19:28
He had accomplished what He had come for, He had provided the way of salvation for all men.
Silverhair
Well-Known Member
Martin I can see one major difference between Joseph and Christ Jesus. Joseph did not have a choice about going to Egypt. Christ Jesus chose to go to the cross. Joh 10:17-18
- Status