Featured How 2 Cor 5:19 teaches limited atonement !

I know you do not like the hard truths of the bible as they do not fit into your man-made theology.

While reconciliation is universal salvation is not. Reconciliation touches the whole human race. Salvation is limited to the few who believe, for salvation depends on faith / belief.
A person may stand before God with every sin covered by the blood of the Son, but if he is still in Adam then death rules over him. There is no hope of resurrection.

Are not all men sinners, ungodly, without strength? These are terms that the bible uses to describe all men prior to being in Christ.
Rom_5:6 For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
Rom_3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

But you will keep saying the same thing over and over hoping that it will make it true. But scripture does not change. "God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself"

 

You do not even agree with calvinist's.

Reconciling the world unto himself - The world here evidently means the human race generally, without distinction of nation, age, or rank. The whole world was alienated from him, and he sought to have it reconciled. This is one incidental proof that God designed that the plan of salvation should be adapted to all people. It may be observed further, that God sought that the world should be reconciled. Man did not seek it. He had no plan for it, he did not desire it. He had no way to effect it. It was the offended party, not the offending, that sought to be reconciled; and this shows the strength of his love. It was love for enemies and alienated beings, and love evinced to them by a most earnest desire to become their friend, and to be at agreement with them. Tyndale renders this very accurately: “For God was in Christ, and made agreement between the world and himself, and imputed not their sins unto them.”
Not imputing their trespasses - Not reckoning their transgressions to them; that is, forgiving them, pardoning them. .... The idea here is, that God did not charge on them with inexorable severity and stern justice their offences, but graciously provided a plan of pardon, and offered to remit their sins on the conditions of the gospel. The plan of reconciliation demonstrated that he was not disposed to impute their sins to them, as he might have done, and to punish them with unmitigated severity for their crimes, but was more disposed to pardon and forgive. The sentiment here is, that God is not disposed or inclined to charge the transgressions of people upon them; he has no pleasure in doing it; and therefore he has provided a plan by which they may be pardoned. At the same time it is true that unless their sins are pardoned, justice will charge or impute their sins to them, and will exact punishment to the uttermost. Barnes

I do not like to do large copy paste but perhaps you will trust what this calvinist has said.

 

Context BF context. You continue to pull verses out of context and thus miss what is being taught.

Rom 4:4 Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt.
Rom 4:5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,
Rom 4:6 just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven, And whose sins are covered;
Rom 4:8 Blessed is the man to whom the LORD shall not impute sin."

Those that believe BF. You keep missing the critical part all the time.

 

If that is all you can say then you have nothing worth listening to. Calvinist's hate context as it shows the error of they view.

In my time on this board I have not seen one good argument from a calvinist/reformed/PB or whatever they want to call themselves supporting their errant view. What I have seen over and over is denial of scripture that shows their error from those same people.

 

@Brightfame52 I know the words offense & trespasses" come from the same Greek word παράπτωμα. but that still does not help your case.

You seem to think that Christ being our propitiation means that man cannot still be held responsible for their sins. While the death made salvation possible for all mankind, one is only saved if they are in Christ. And for someone to be in Christ requires that they freely trust in Him.

Christ’s death on the cross makes our reconciliation to God possible. Romans 5:10-11

 

BF you make some wild statements care to expand on them. What lie?

 

Still not answering the question BF.

You seem to pass over the verses you do not like in scripture. Why is the BF?

1Jn 2:2 And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world.

 

@Brightfame52 I do not know why you struggle so much with these verses? Paul made it clear if you will just read what he wrote.

2Co 5:18 Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation,

The whole world was alienated from Him, and He {God the Father} sought to have it reconciled. This was accomplished through the cross. We know that through the death of Christ all man-kinds sin debt was covered. {1 John 2:2}
God, in His love, was reaching out to man.

2Co 5:20 Now then, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ's behalf, be reconciled to God.

God has removed all the obstacles to reconciliation which existed on His part. God has reached out to man through His creation, the conviction of the Holy Spirit and the gospel message now it remains that man be reconciled to God. (Romans 10:8-10)

God seeks us, but will not force us. God calls us, but we have to answer. God provides reconciliation, but we have to accept the outstretched hand of reconciliation.

 

I understand your points to be misinformed if that 's what you are asking?