Search results

No, the Textus Receptus is not perfect, there is no perfect Greek/Hebrew.

Post is tagged KJB #4 - Inspired First of all, here are some words of the Hampton Court regarding two verses which were not translated correctly: https://bibleprotector.com/hampton-court.pdf " AN EXCERPT FROM THE SUM AND SUBSTANCE OF THE CONFERENCE, FROM 14 JANUARY, 1603, AT HAMPTON COURT...

Do believe the tribulation perid will be faith alone or works as well? ? Yes, the Godhead is that, but three persons or one person?

Interesting, what is opinon on dispesnational salvation and what is the gospel? Also, about the Godhead.

Thanks for replying and what is thy stance on this issue. KJB only?

Paul wrote Hebrews, I am not changing my mind.

Well, not everyone have the same exact doctrine, but those who have the truth about the gospel is most important.

链接到 2 项 Some good pdfs I recieved about this issue.

The King James Bible is the word of God, I believe the King James Bible since its right, I will not use any other version that change the word of God.

Do not use hell like that, yes, I know what you guys believe and its very sad. Anyways, there is no point of repeating what I said, I will pray that wilt find the truth by God's grace.

I do agree that God inspired those but the Bible for the world to day is the English King James Bible. The NKJV is not a KJB. The King James Bible had things that were close to the Douay and others since that is what it is in scripture, its nothing related to new versions using the same idea...

The new versions omit verses.

The perfect word of God is the King James Bible, not the New King James or any other version.

Yes, I have inspired scripture and still haven't convinced me the understanding I have is wrong.

The Latin/Greek probably means the same thing in those verses just like John 1:1, Genesis 1:1 where the Catholics just had a better rendering of it that had no influence in theology. The King James Bible is still not Catholic nor supports Catholic doctrine, the King James Bible is the word of God.

That dosen't convince me in any way to not use the King James Bible. The Latin, Douay still says Jesus is God, and the gospel, dosen't mean its right in the other areas. The Latin Vulgate is actually quite close to the King James vs the Critical Text. It still omits stuff like Matthew 6:13's...

The only way to really prove Pugratory on the Catholic side is to use the Acryophal.

Its said Irreanus said Matthew/Mark/Luke/John.

Al Alleuia.

Dear readers, I was reading an article before, that talked about this issue, in one of his epistles, he told us how he penned each one and all his epistles ends with Grace be with you all. Amen. Anyways, there is a lot of critics, some even claim the first five books were not written by...