• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search results

  1. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    No, unlike you I just read in context. Why did Jesus say many instead of all? Hmm?
  2. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    How do you get that from what I said? You don't.
  3. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    Right and 1 Timothy 2:6 is not talking about all individuals. Jesus said he gave his life as a ransom for many, not all.
  4. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    Because you read your presupposition into the text. What you just said is not there and ignores the rest of Scrpture including what Christ said himself.
  5. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    Besides, Jesus TOLD us who he died for, and it wasn't everyone. He laid his life down for the sheep.
  6. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    And where in that verse does it say he died for every individual? It doesn't. It says God loved the world. Then it says he gave his son for the whosever.
  7. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    The Bible doesn't say Christ died for every individual so that wouldn't be called redemption.
  8. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    Jesus himself stated that.
  9. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    General Redemption meaning Christ died for every individual, not just the elect, is a lie.
  10. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    Can't prove a negative. General redemption is not found in scripture without taking verses out of context. Jesus said he laid down his life for the sheep, not all individuals without distinction.
  11. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    General redemption is also a lie.
  12. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    You cannot have a general redemption without either universalism or a works based salvation.
  13. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    hahahahahahahahaha no it isn't.
  14. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    An inconvenient truth for some.
  15. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    Except, as you have been shown, that's not what 2 Peter 2:1 says. You take one verse out of context and bank your entire theology on it ignoring the rest of Scripture.
  16. Reformed1689

    If a female were to make a ML Baseball team???

    So men should also be allowed to compete in women's sports? You are ok with Lia Thomas?
  17. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    I deny it because it isn't true. Bible says he laid down his life for the sheep.
  18. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    LOL no it isn't.
  19. Reformed1689

    2 Peter 2:1

    Yeah the Bible doesn't say that.
  20. Reformed1689

    If a female were to make a ML Baseball team???

    Create a women's league. I don't want to see women in baseball just like I don't want to see them in football or the NBA.
View older results
Top