Search results

How can it be plainer BF? You just do not like that answer do you. Are you so blinded by your false religion that you cannot see what is right in front of you? Read this again slowly and perhaps it will sink in. God gave man the free will with which to make real eternal destiny changing...

What did I just say BF? You are under the false impression that all men are just robots such as your religion requires. You believe the men that taught you that but it is not biblical. God gave man the free will with which to make real eternal destiny changing choices. You will disagree...

I would hope that all Christians would have some things in common even those that hold to some "ism". I will stick with the word of God's word.

I am always surprised that so many of the anti-biblical types think that the bible has to agree with calvinism if the word of God is to be considered true. They seem to think calvinism is the standard by which the bible is to be judged.

And what did Philip use to teach the man Z? The word of God. He did not twist it or add to it as those who are anti-biblical do. For some odd reason you think calvinism is the standard by which the bible is to be judged. You have it backwards Z in your anti-biblical rants you fail to...

Van God being Omniscient means He knows all things not just some things. He can and does overlook some things but that does not mean He does not know of them.

That is a rather odd comment from one you is anti-biblical Z. As a bible believer I post what the word of God says. Those that hold to anti-biblical views have to alter the word of God to fit their man-made philosophy.

Well since I am not an Arminian it really does not impact what I believe. The bible tells us that all are drawn to God and Christ died for all sinners and all can freely respond to the various means that God uses to draw man to Himself. But I see you are still holding to your anti-biblical...

Do they have the free will option, YES would they possibly. But as I said since God draws all to Him then that is not an issue. What do you think creation and the conviction of the Holy Spirit is for BF?

I have not problem with a persons views as long as they do not push non-biblical views. So as always we will agree to disagree.

And you continue to ignore the following verse and what the bible actually teaches. You can make the bible say just about anything you want when you cherry pick verses and ignore context but it only leads to a false understanding of God's word. Man cannot save himself but God has drawn all to...

Ken you asked "how could Jesus die and pay the sin debt for sins that had not even been actually committed yet?" Even you should know the answer to that. He is God. Are you saying that He was not the propitiation for the sins of the whole world? Was His sacrifice was sufficient to cover the...

You have lost your mind Z. Philip could not be a calvinist as 1] it had not been invented yet. Had to wait for augustine for that and 2] Philip just used the word of God as written. No additions or twisting of the text. He was biblical not anti-biblical as you seem to think he was.

That is not a concern as the God draws all. Read your bible BF.

Why would I trust in man rather than in the word of God?

Those that hold to anti-biblical views will try to justify the man-made religion they hold all the while ignoring the clear word of God. They forget that the word of God is the standard not calvinism.

Problem for the anti-biblical crowd is that since God draws all people to Himself then those that hear and learn will come to the Son. oh 12:32 "And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself." Joh 6:45 "It is written in the prophets, 'AND THEY SHALL ALL BE TAUGHT OF...

Care to show me where I said what you claim I said? Couple of problems with your post. Philip could not have been a calvinist as augustine had not yet brought pagan philosophy into the church. And two Philip did not try to make the word odd God fit some odd non biblical philosophy.

So you avoid the question Z. But I have to ask, what words did I add? I will make it easy for you, Here is what I posted so just bold the words I added. And again context topples your view. Paul was using hyperbole to make a point to the Jews he was speaking to. We can know this when we look...

Who are the the all that Christ draws Z? Are they different from those the Father draws? Show me where I did not understand the verses Z. You make these comments but do not provide any proof. Show me where Z. Joh 6:45 "It is written in the prophets, 'AND THEY SHALL ALL BE TAUGHT OF GOD.'...