Search results

Yes, basically, rape =death penalty" Pregnant out of wedlock=shot-gun wedding. I'll look up the relevant passages: Short answer (can't prove it yet) 1.) Rapists are simply killed 2.) pregnant girls who can't demonstrate a plausible rape accusation simply get shot-gun weddinged. That's why...

[QUOTE=[/U]"canadyjd, post: 2847655, member: 5784"]You being a subject matter expert in the prison system, perhaps you could answer a question for me. You state you have worked for the federal prison system for 14 years. So, the prisoners you see were convicted of federal crimes, correct? Yes...

That should be a fornication issue then: kill them both... But, I think false accusations of rape are covered. By the "cry-out" insistence..

I think you are mistaken here actually: I think you are refering to where it speaks of a woman (presumably in a city) where she could "cry-out" but, if she did not, then he has to pay the father...Put, differently it was a way preventing a situation where a woman was found to be pregnant out of...

No, I will not. As I do not need it, and I would likely not care what they have to say. Most likely "Mental-health" counseling is merely liberal women telling me not to think as I do. I accept that you do not have any reasonable response to my arguments: I have known this for a while. I...

I'll pretend to believe that this is true for the sake of this discussion. I have been "hypocritical" about nothing: "Hypocrisy" is now the stupidest and laziest thing anyone now accuses anyone of.......but, I am not incidentally guilty of it. It's the accussation on internet Atheists against...

All else being equal: As a Floridian (who loves my governor) We believe anyone who rapes a child should die. You can do whatever you want in whatever evil State you live in that I don't care about... But, in my State: I love what my Governor passed into law.

HERETIC! UNIVERSALIST HERETIC! :Sneaky

Over only: All others are Satan-worshippers and must therefore die. So let it be written, so let it be done.

I absolutely believe them unapologetically and 100%. No, that would be stupid: The only thing agreed upon, is that there are persons who should never join polite society again for one of two reasons: 1.) The nature of their crimes is such that "justice" simply insists that they are given a...

Yes, and unequivocally. I do. Yes, unequivocally and it's also safer and better for the victims and it is a 100% guarantee that that criminal will not commit any future crimes. As it stands: You have (and thanks for doing so) paid me over $65.00 an hour (for countless hours) to sit in a...

Not going to happen, prisons do not and absolutely cannot work that way. And how would you know that some deranged judges on the Supreme Court wouldn't invent a reason why they shouldn't be brought back into society in the next ten years? The problem with not using the Death Penalty: is judges...

I don't know where your information about how prisons actually work comes from: But (only two meals a day) is simply not an option: Not now, not ever: And that is not a tool any Warden is ever capable of using. I do know something about prison systems: I've been an employee of the Federal...

Yes, it is in that spirit. "It's better for ten guilty men to go free than for one innocent person be convicted" has to do with being given rights to a fair trial before an impartial jury. This does nothing to change that. All this does, is say, that if given a fair trial before an impartial...

:Thumbsup Agreed... Especially that it is quite understandable that some think him a Christophany. I don't believe so either, but the type is undeniable....And so obviously inspired by God, it's obviously miraculous. I cannot fathom mere mortal men coming up with that saving God's...

I agree with you on all points. Perhaps except that I don't know how critically foudational it is to Covenant Theology. There is no "covenant" supplied in the Genesis narrative. I would also add that the negative consequences of Adam's sin are presented as an almost unavoidable response on...

That's what they do by definition. No, it isn't. If it's a portrayal of an historical person (or even a recast of a known fictional one) You want an actor/actress who can convincingly stand in for that person. Hate to break it to you, but, Peter Dinklage (an insanely talented actor) cannot...

Heretic!!! Ben stiller would have been a much better sampson! ;) In all truth....If you want to compare Black actors who would make a great Sampson....(remember you need a muscular imposing person) I'm on the side of Idris Elba! He's epic cool.

Well, we do know two things about what are often called "The Black Pharaohs" A term professional historians coined. 1.) There was a period of Nubian conquerors of Egypt who were black and set themselves up as the Pharaohs of Egypt. 2.) This was/is a sore spot for national ethnic Egyptians. (Or...

It may not always be so simple to "race-swap" characters. For the Egyptians, this can be a sore spot for their patriotic outlook. Egypt's ancient history contained a particular period where Egypt was conquered by Nubian kings. Twenty-fifth Dynasty of Egypt - Wikipedia These were and to an...