Search results

No, he exposed them for what they are. They've never been real hearings for decades. And we know who's responsible.

Critical theory, social justice, BLM, etc. is the racism of our day. I pray the Church in every shade, can unite against it.

Hirono was disgusting. Always is. She knew the answer already. She's a walking spectacle. Cruz is a rock star. He's giving the American people perspective. And his colleagues support him in it.

I'm fine with it. Hirono asked if she was a sexual predator. If the dems go full political, Republicans have to play it smart. Let the country know she's human.

Pride. I'm just asking a simple question, because it fits with what you've been saying. But I would accept a simple denial. Maybe your conscience won't let you deny it.

Extra defensive. Hmmm.

Do you really expect people to focus on you above all others? There's a lot of posters here. But you know that, so this is totally illogical. I appears you're oneness, but don't want to say.

You're Joe Biden now? Why so dodgy?

Jason Whitlock is a rare voice of reason in the sports world. Regularly calls out "godless" BLM. He defends a football coach who was fired for a sign saying "All Lives Matter to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ." All Pastors should trumpet this truth.

Not everything, no. It's not an accusation. Just asking.

This video is well done. Great to pass on to fellow Christians struggling with this issue.

Except CRT doesn't address racism at all, but rather stokes it.

I actually view opposing CRT as fighting racism.

He wants to know if you deny the Trinity. Are you advocating oneness theology?

....for all individuals of all races. Racists come in all colors. It's part of the sinful nature. CRT calls out only one race, and not even individuals.

What does any of this have to do with CTC? White Fragility, Social justice etc.? You're describing individual racism which the Church does deal with. And it appears you've benefited from it. What aspects of CRT do you think are good?

And, frankly, I don't think there's a need to be nice or apologetic about it. It's wicked.

Friel tackles this. Frankly, I think even he's too squishy on it, but he does concede it's time for Pastor's to get firm and denounce it.

I'll have to ponder that. I can grant a slight difference, but very small. Doesn't seem significant. Feel free to expand on the significance.

I'm in total agreement with you, especially when they fudge on the historicity of Adam. But it's not a problem for the hermeneutic of Keller, Wright and many of these other guys. We both agree it's a serious issue, and therefore it should give you pause regarding these men and their...