Search results

What an Strawman, as if we simply refuse the new translations because they are new. Because all of us KJVO people are simply traditionalists who think everything new is evil and wicked... yeah right. We recognize that what you textual critics call "oldest and best" manuscripts are really corrupt...

I do not argue that the modern translations do not sometimes "contain" the word of God. But I believe them to be horribly corrupted.

https://www.chick.com/reading/books/158/158_05.asp The changes between the different "versions" of the KJV are absolutely not comparably to the butchery of the Modern Translations.

Do you believe that the 1950 New World Translation of the New Testament is more accurate and faithful to the originals than the most current edition of whatever particular translation you use? Why or why not?

1. Because the "Art and science" of textual criticism has been developed by APOSTATES and THEOLOGICAL LIBERALS. And it's not "science" it's a philosophy that has it's foundation in rationalism. 2. What better manuscripts are you talking about? Do you still believe the mantra that "older" is...

Evan I also would like to ask you some questions. 1. Do you believe God has promised to preserve his words for us? 2.. Do you believe the Bible is inspired and without error? 3. If so, Where can someone get a copy of this bible that is inspired and without error? Does it exist anywhere today...

1. Because it was inserted between the testaments with the title "Apocrypha" which means Spurious. 2. People get saved through hearing the Gospel, the Gospel is found in other translations, although other doctrines are watered down and diluated in them. 3. as to which one is inspired, I do not...

While we are familiar with them, they are in a different camp then us, and we differ with them on the doctrine of repentance.

It's time again for Fairhaven Baptist College's Volleyball Marathon. Please support me This is a fundraiser. I need at least $50 to participate. You can go to the school's website at http://www.fairhavenbaptistcollege.org/donate/volleyball-marathon From there, you can go to the donate page and...

Really? Are you really gonna use James chapter 2 in the context of Salvation? You need to go and learn the context of James chapter 2, it's talking justifying our faith before men, not being justified in the eyes of God, it has to do with someone claiming faith, but not having works. James 2:18...

So do Jehovah's Witnesses? Do you think that means all JW's are saved? If you ask any Catholic if Jesus is their Savior they will almost all claim it, I know this because we go door to door every Saturday and 8/10 people are Catholic. my Pastor knows a Catholic who claimed they received Christ...

why would you take Rubio over Cruz? seriously, Rubio is not what this country needs. Rubio is a lost Roman Catholic, Cruz is a saved southern baptist.

You do realize that site is simply a bunch of people making fun of and making satire out of fundamentalism right?

BTW, John i completely appreciate this thread and think it was needed. Thumbs up for Gospel Tracts.

Your missing the point, the point is that the Gospel of John basically is a Gospel tract. It just shows that God uses things that are written to influence people.

This is a straw man argument, Christ's teaching on helping others, is directed to individuals, not to a government entity, the responsibility to love and care for others is something individuals must decide according to their own conscience and the leading of God, for the Government to take...

the Bible does not give the government the authority to do all the things advocated in this.

H.A. Ironside. read any of his commentaries, very sound doctrine and very Christ centered.

thank you for this response, it is needed for those who feel the constant need to bash on tracts.