Search results

The Man with Two Brains He also repeats it in L.A. Story a cute and highly underrated film. Even Sarah Jessica Parker is charming in it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uriah_Heep

Right, which is the un-biblical assumption wherein he errs, and inasmuch as he must insist Christ is sinless, he must therefore deny he took on humanity like you and I since humanity is "sinful" by the rote fact of that same "fallen nature" he thinks to be Scripture. That's exactly what I...

Yes, because it's not only un-biblical it's primitive, stupid, pagan witch-craft. Augustine was a Gnostic heretic, persecutor of Christians, a fornicator who lived with mistresses, a connossieur of blood-thirsty Roman gladiatorial games, false witness and a cheerleader for prostitution and all...

Sir, for all intents and purposes, you have denied Christ's humanity in every conceivable way. It is obvious. Yes, your Theology robs this of all meaning. Nothing you say on this topic is Biblically derived. It is derived from a Theological Construct that you believe is Biblical, but it's...

I said nothing about a "fallen nature", nor do I think Christ had such a thing. "Fallen Nature" is only entering this discussion as it is part of your Theological constructs. True. Flesh isn't "unholy".....that's Gnosticism, which is the driving force behind the Docetism which governs most of...

I run from nothing.. I affirm the post. I deny your accusation that I suggested that the Father had a physical body. I own my post just fine. I deny the falsehood that I suggested that the Father has a physical body. You are welcome to post where I said that. I was (as I posted) making a...

Yeah, we all know and affirm this and no one has suggested otherwise. No, and no one has suggested or hinted at as much. Furthermore, we all know full well that no human distractions achieved what the father of liars could not achieve. Jesus did not sin. Then you deny the Scripture as it...

uhhh…. yeah, which is why no one has spoken of any such thing except yourself, right here. uhhhh..again, correct, which is why no one has spoken of such things here, well, until you did with this post right here. Yeah, which is why there are no Mormons in this conversation nor anyone who...

It has nothing to do with "examples" it has to do with what constitutes sin. James makes it clear what happens in the course of the commission of sin Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: But every man is...

Good responses on here: One thing I tend to avoid (just to nit-pick) is that it is probably not helpful to use phraseology such as Christ being 100% God and 100% Man. I think such terminology can lead to confusion. I do think "truly" God and "truly" man as found in Chalcedon was brilliantly...

I never define "die" as "cease to exist"....I think that is, for numerous reasons, a bad definition. Christ very much did die, but he never ceased to exist. But the point was, that by your logic (that if Christ could sin than God could) then we would either also have to deny that he died, or...

Thanks for the discussion S.G. By your logic though (insisting that if Christ could sin, then the Father could too) then you would similarly have to say that if Christ could die, then the Father could die as well. Certainly we can't deny that Christ died. Thus, we need to understand...

The Incarnation is mysterious indeed, but what we do know is that it involved the Second member of the God-head becoming a man......actually and truly a man..... which is necessary for him to function in our place as the Second Adam. I fear that some essentially undermine that truth with the...

Not Biblical.

lol...Starbucks is overrated anyway. That's a fair position, but the question which we must answer is whether he is "off his rocker" because our Theological presuppositions prevent the possibility or because the most relevant texts imply it? In other words which is driving and shaping which?

Denying impeccability is not to deny the Divinity of Christ. It is just as easy to argue that asserting impeccability is Docetism. Neither one is truly heretical. One's inability to grasp how something can be true which seems to deny a Cardinal rule of our own Theological constructs doesn't...

Scripture is abundantly clear...... infants aren't sinners. I John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. Note: it isn't a disease as all gnostics preach. It isn't some transferred guilt which is contained in male...

I laughed out loud!!!!!! I sound like a guffawing idiot! Thanks for that laugh, it doeth good like a medicine. You are welcome to join our local Ekklesia any time!

Tom...Question: My understanding of the USE of the term Ekklesia is that it is based upon the "calling-out" of Greek voters in relation to the conduct of civil polity. In other words, the term itself is steeped in conducting, well, politics frankly...... read "business meetings". An "ekklesia"...