Search results

So is "steal" or "lie".... You are acting as though since they are action verbs that they would similarly fit a Biblical definition of "works". No one believes this. Yes, it's not a "work" in any meaningful sense, and you are too intelligent to believe this. Yes, you did. ". . .you are not...

Right. "Sleep" and "snore" are also action verbs. It hardly qualifies as a "work" in any meaningful sense. To conflate action verbs with a Biblical definition of "works" is absurd. I half believe T.C. doesn't really even buy his own argument on this. It's slightly insulting that he seems to...

Dust. Feet. Off. Your. The. Kick.

As an aside, dad, to your *gasp!!!!* "Did Adam write of things AFTER his death!...bwaaaahaaahaaa"... scoff: I note the third of the links I provided argues this: " The weight of evidence suggests that the respective names attached to the toledoth represent subscripts or closing signatures...

Those who desire to more greatly understand the origin and authorship of the foundational book of the Christian Faith. True, there are also no papyri or scrolls of the Pauline letters from his lifetime....Do you then insist they were all written sometime in the 4th Century? You do not know...

Some of the finest and most conservative Old Testament scholars. It talks about a record of the generations. According to you perhaps... According, again, to some of the finest and most knowledgeable Old Testament scholars, Theologians working alongside Archaeologists studying how headings are...

That is an unwarranted and not Biblically supported assumption on your part. TC (and others) are attempting to show you that the BIBLICAL evidence itself is that each of those "Toledoths"...(these are the generations of statements) are of themselves testimony that they are accounts written about...

What would be the point of showing it to you? Since you aren't Sola Scriptura anyway and would simply wait for the Catholic Church to pronounce against it anyway... Why even ask?

Unless, as has been argued, the use in Genesis of the phrase "these are the generations of"... or the "toledoths" is, in fact, the book of Genesis itself bearing witness of being multiple accounts in written form. It's very likely. Many Conservative, Bible-believing scholars understand it to...

That is not now, never was, and never will be the "point" being argued. No, he wasn't he was denying that "Synergists" affirm God's ability... That's the lie. and it makes honest debate impossible, and it's why they reject your claims and labels. Right, Great, God is God, and when God does...

Yes, it is. True. Also, not the point being argued. No one denies this Sure...irrelevant, and assumed, but, sure, yes, that's true.

That's a distinction important to you, and probably T.C. but not Rev Mitchell, or likely Sapper or any other "Synergist" in your thread... The problem is your word "CANNOT". Until you understand why they reject your entire O.P. wholesale, you won't understand the problem they have with it. It's...

I miss you Willis. You were the most Godly man I knew.

Nontheless: This video helps explain the Gnostic heresy which is "Calvinism" It's best understood coupled with this video This helps explain the pagan roots of the Philosophy preached by the Gnostic heretics here.... They call themselves "Calvinists"

Well, that nastiness from you is par for the course for a Calvinist. Sad to see the hate in your heart for your erstwhile brethren. I still love you Willis.... And I wish you weren't trapped in the deceit you are now trapped in. I have to say, I miss the kind "Convicted 1" who was I...

Also this: These videos explain where the views of Calvinists from.... They are, of course, modified, but they explain the source of why "Calvinists" think as they do, and also what error it was which crept into the Western Church <----- (not the Eastern Churches who were never Gnostic) So...

This explains the Gnosticism which Calvinism is quite well:

"Calvinism" is the Gnostic heresy reborn under a different moniker. "Arminianism" is the attempt to bring Theology back to a reasonable and sound account whilst simultaneously accepting the endemic Gnosticism which is endemic in "Calvinist" Theology. Both "Arminianism" and "Calvinism" are...

The "point" is... They assume (with zilch biblical warrant) that that passage is speaking of individual "election" to salvation, and they assume then, that we also accept that and therefore think that we have to answer that "objection" on their terms. We don't think that, because it's a...

Because only Calvinists actually believe that this passage is about what they think it's about.... It isn't even particularly relevant to the debate. It has actually nothing to do with it. You guys just don't know that. That's why we don't tend to respond to that one.... To do so, would be to...