Search results

Your "firearm attachment" is simply a throw away issue. Trump knew that. It does absolutely no harm, that is zero harm, to the second Amendment. Another ludicrous statement on your part. A "bump stock" is a gimmick and the 2nd Amendment doesn't address gimmicks. Just guns. You ludicrous...

I'll go for that. With one caveat...When the government tries to forcefully confiscate our guns, some people are going to die. And some of them will be law enforcement people who should know better. Legislators need to take heed. Most of the democrats running for president are too stupid to...

Obama never had control of the Senate. Couldn't get past the filibuster when they were in the majority. And then he lost his majorities. So, he simply COULDN'T run through his anti gun agenda, and he knew it. But he always talked about wanting to. Trump could try, if he had such an agenda...

Yes. It is. Nothing else to discuss here.

I can't decide which one on that list is the most reprehensible. :confused: Could be because they all are.

Lots of knee level wind amongst the democrats this morning. The talking points are already out and their lapdog media are running them non stop.

It's a lie.

What would "civil war" look like in the country today? Then, I'll say whether or not I think it's coming.

The usual suspects.

I am not surprised in the least, but... That's not the story democrats and their Hollywood elites are peddling.:Roflmao

Bump stocks, to me, were a non issue. Couldn't care less that they are now banned. And he has signed onto no red flag laws. Why? There hasn't been one that doesn't blatantly violate due process. As For Trump being worse than his predecessor concerning guns, that's one of the silliest...

Good thing you added that.

What has he done to make you think he is just "marginal"?

Could be, but I don't trust Canadians. None of them.

If they live in Canada, they are used to a socialist system. We don't need more of that kind of influence.

Finally! A president that understands world economics and how to make it benefit the people who elected him, and even the haters who didn't.

No. Canadians are indoctrinated and used to socialism.

He's really bouncing around. It seems the only thing we can be sure of with Graham is that he will defend John McCain and his legacy , such as it is, to the very end.

Regardless of how many people have made fools of themselves over Taylor's testimony, the bottom line is: "...Taylor conceded that there was no quid pro quo." Schiff's selective leak is all a sham. But look at how many fake news organizations and otherwise pretty smart people got taken in by...

Exactly. The real story here is not Taylor. It's Schiff and his lies and plotting.