Search results

Then, Christ was born a sinner......or he wasn't a human and you deny that he was a human. Please find the Scripture which teaches Christ was not a Son of Adam. Jesus was a man. A human. A Son of Adam. Christ wasn't "In Christ" ....he actually WAS the Christ. He was also a man.. born of Adam...

I'd challenge any Calvinist to answer me that one... Any one time after salvation you were set before you the option to either choose right or wrong, to sin, or not to sin, and you had no ability whatsoever to choose to do right, and you sinned without the capacity to do otherwise. And then...

Here's a better question John: Please name any one circumstance you know of, post salvation, that you were the subject of, in which you were given the option to either disobey God, or not to disobey God, and you had no ability whatsoever to do the right thing and therefore sinned by...

I'll reply to this one, it's a different one, not the first you asked but: YES. If the Holy Spirit indwells us, why not? With God all things are possible, why can't a saved indwelled person continue without sin? If someone is saved on their "death-bed" as it were, and simply has little to...

I want to answer your question, and I will....I've no problem with it..... But, I need you to ask a question which has no presuppositional content attached. Your first question was this: That question implies something I deny.... Namely, that there IS a "WHY" to a person sinning, or, put...

Yes. That's not what the Bible says. The Bible says he was human...100% human, just like we are, and was tempted....just like we are. You want him to have a nature that we don't share. A form of sinless flesh we don't have...That isn't what the Bible says: The Bible says he was tempted just as...

Many people who are not saved, in any given situation when they are able to sin or not sin, steal or not steal, smack their wife or not smack their wife.....be nasty or curb their tongue...often choose the right thing. Choosing to do right isn't sinning. Unsaved persons choose not to sin when...

BINGO! 1Jo 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 1Jo 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that...

I'm sorry, I don't know what you are asking. You have to be more specific.

Apparently not...but, everyone has their own spin on Arminius anyways. Then again, Arminius is hardly the Messiah of non-Calvinists so, it doesn't matter that much. Arminius was a smart guy....but, he was too steeped in Reformation Augustinianism for my liking. He had to explain away Eternal...

Hey, I get it, and that's cool with me. I just thought that was a rare combination indeed! I was raised in, and I preach in, Southern Baptist pulpits and I don't believe in Eternal Security (as such)...... I also read the Bible for myself.... and I don't see it...but I think it's a minor...

You pastor at a Free Will Baptist Church and you also believe in Eternal Security? I thought that was a new one.

Fact: Calling Christ a "liar" would be a ban-worthy and inexcusable offense. That's a fact. Fact: You claimed quite publicly that someone who disagrees with you Theologically "Called Christ a liar". You have yet to post where anyone called Christ a "liar": No one has been banned for it...not...

This is churlish, childish and unnecessary....also irrelevant. 1.) He isn't my "champion".....and his conduct was indeed disgraceful. That's true. But............. You invoked that in order to Poison the Well against the larger point of the video....the METHOD that you chose (to demonize a...

I don't know much about Morrell...though I have a basic understanding of where he is on this debate topic.... I'd never seen that video of him being such an arse to that fellow about homosexuality... I just found this one video of his worth consideration. I would say, I'm closer to agreeing...

Oh, no... No sir...It wasn't a deflection at all. This topic is essentially one which effects the Cal-Arm debate, quite directly. Now, I posted a video which addressed it in some way, and someone threw out a video of Mr. Morell acting like (granted a complete ass)....thus Poisoning the Well...

Ah, Fred Phelps, a man, like you, who adheres to all five points of the TULIP. "Bible illiterates".... like Fred Phelps the adherent of "Sovereign Grace", who agrees with your Soteriology.

Then why complain about him quoting a bunch of Church Fathers and decry his use of Scripture? What you said was: "He quoted a bunch of "church fathers" and much scripture out of context." But, you just said he quoted "little Scripture" Forgive then, my confusion. Agreed....much like...

Yes....beliefs and practices of the "Church Fathers" was actually the point of the video...And how one particular "Church Father" was probably or at least plausibly poorly influenced in his views by previous practices and Philosophies. I would expect him to, since that was the point of it. Did...

Especially ones where no one wants to watch and actually comment on the video posted. I find the video engaging, informative, provocative and worth being considered. It's really that simple. That's why I titled the thread "Food for Thought". It couldn't be simpler.