Search results

Putin has at times been clever in the past but as you said, I’m talking about the hear and now. And right now this has been poorly planned and thought out. We weren’t trying to take over Iraq alone with crippling economic sanctions. In fact we had dozens of countries supporting us as a...

What are you talking about? My post had literally nothing whatsoever to do with Trump. Talk about drinking the Kool-aid.

Lol…yeah things are going swimmingly for Vlad right now.

I’m having a hard time understanding how anything Putin has done here is even remotely in the category of “smart.” From a tactical standpoint we have seen an elementary tactical plan of resupply and refueling, bad morale in Russian troops, odd tactics of leaving armored vehicles in the open in...

Lol. Yes it’s almost likely we are reacting to things in the order they are happening?

Yes he does. 100%

Goodbye Scarlett. Thank you for your insight and service as a moderator.

It’s disingenuous to act like this was a one on one scenario. Sure he could have detained her one on one but the flood gates were bursting and their perimeter had deteriorated to the inner rooms of the building. What about the 100’s that follow her through the door?

And Donald Trump.

One did. Turns out it wasn’t a fantasy.

Doesn’t matter. OP is false…as usual. Good job deflecting…as usual.

Of course he sees it. Which is why he will refuse to address it. By now he just realized he trapped himself with his own logic and will not let his pride get out of the way to admit it.

Then I’m sure you can point out the errors in the politico article he posted right?

You’d have to ask them.

I wanted the Dodgers bad. Got the revenge!

Huge Braves fan here. The last week was not good for my blood pressure. I love this group of Braves just sad that Acuna doesn’t get to participate.

Parson issues legal threat against Post-Dispatch after database flaws exposed This is utterly amazing.

Translation: I’m going to post a bunch of fear mongering stuff I found from the dredges of the internet but will not engage with anyone that dare opposes. Mostly because this stuff is pretty easy to poke holes in and I don’t want to get embarrassed with someone that can do a simple google search.

I get it it but she’s not exactly wrong.

This is a long way of saying he had the audacity to disagree with you. That is just a fact of life. I think you take all this way too personally. If he disagrees with you and you don’t like each other’s sources then talk it out. That’s the nature of a message board. I don’t know about the...