Search results

Ellen White's writings, of course.

This post is not based in reality or what I said. The platform of the Democratic Party is #1 Abortion on demand, no matter what your views are on the matter, we are talking Democrats, as in politicians, and those who vote for them, by extension. Second, the Democratic Party is the party of...

Of course, this is why Bob wants to restrict all debate to official belief statements of the SDA and why I wanted to talk about the actual beliefs of the SDA. Now all are aware that those are two different subjects. Bob has been intentionally trying to deceive us. That's should be obvious to...

Fig trees bear figs, not thorns, and man cannot act in a manner contrary to his nature. That seems self-evident, so forgive me for not wanting to spend much time trying to explain it further, as there are preexisting conditions that cause you to not accept my position on free will, and I accept...

Jesus on the subject: "I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin...If you were Abraham's children," said Jesus, "then you would do the things Abraham did. As it is, you are determined to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such...

What we do know is that her source was not God. We know that because when we "test the spirits", she fails where she deviates from scripture.

My apologies. Sloppy on my part. When computer hardware begins to function without an OS, your argument for LFW will be valid. Yes. I understand; however, causality is where you were having difficulty in understanding Frame. Thanks for stopping by.

The cause does not have to be "external".

Some Biblical examples might be helpful: “…no good tree bears bad fruit, nor again does a bad tree bear good fruit, for each tree is known by its own fruit. For figs are not gathered from thornbushes, nor are grapes picked from a bramble bush. The good person out of the good treasure of his...

You are wrong in point #2, as I've already explained. You believe that men make choices that have no cause. You claim "self" as cause, but that is no answer.

There have always been different interpretations of God's words. Satan presented interpretations of God's words when he tempted Christ. ****Edited to add It is man's work to handle God's Word correctly. 2 Timothy 2:15

You agree with point #1 You then go wrong in point #2 and can't correct yourself from there. There are people who imagine that choices are uncaused, you being one of them.

Men still act. They do choose, and their choices have causes.

With all of that fuss, you've managed to say absolutely nothing. Well done. There's a career in politics awaiting you.

Yes, and Trump had nothing to do with it! However, Obama, Hillary, and the FBI. . . that's the story here. Makes Watergate look like chid's play.

How many posts have asked him that same question, yet no answer.

That is where we would disagree. Free agency does not cause choice. It does not cause anything. Alice (In Wonderland) was at a fork in the road, and a free agent, but without an underlying cause, she would remain at that fork, frozen.

Apples and pineapples. We are discussion how one is justified, not how justified ones behave.

We Reformed folks, better than most, understand that the proper way to interpret the scriptures is to understand what the original audience would have heard and what the author intended for them to hear; however, in this case (and many others) the meaning is identical. This is didactic...

If you eliminate us as the secondary audience in this instance, you make the entire Bible irrelevant.