Search results

Not too far back he was defending HWs terminologies, once the majority crowd started gathering against HW, then P4T switchied gears and compelled him to be circumcised LOL

And YOU are missing the point, it doesn't matter what the PURPOSE was in comforting believers, the comfort was the fact that they are not going to hell, and in that response God says He is NOT WILLING that ANY should perish. You can't rip the verse out of its context simply because it was about...

"The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." Peter was talking ABOUT heathen even though he was not talking TO them. Paul said "In flaming fire taking...

Could someone please tell me where "Second Ezekiel" is at?:eek:

Yom Revee´ee-final answer

You do exist! You really are not me. Whew! That's a relief. :wavey:

I beg your pardons, I am not a pterodactyl :)

And you are a Calvinist?? OK I admit, I've never heard of a Calvinist that believes a Christian can suffer the same portion as an unbeliever. That's a new one on me.

So only MANY were made sinners, but not ALL were made sinners? Now here's the bad implication of this analogy. Group One: SINNERS, Non Elect, determined to hell Group Two: Elect, determined to salvation If not all are sinners, that excludes group two, because group one is the only...

As many disagreements as I have, and as stubborn as I am to give an inch to someone on certain issues, THAT made me spit my coffee out:laugh:

What are the standards? CALVINISM. Calvin's Institutes, Westminster Confession, Belgium Confession, Philadelphia Confession, Saturday Morning Mass Confession (oops, sorry that's Catholic, but my what a remarkable resemblance). Fundamental Baptists: THE BIBLE.

Perfect example of how Calvinists restate someone elses position, and then insert their own theology into the text where it doesn't say what the Bible says it does. The passage is specifically about the restoration of Israel corporately, NOT INDIVIDUAL SALVATION. The context is the debate about...

And yet Spurgeon was pre-mil. If he was convinced that Augie and Calvin preached the truth, why didn't he adopt either one of their eschatological views?

. I will agree that he was occupied alright. "Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep; In journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers...

Here's a question for all to ponder. How many trying to convince Awaken, stopped what they were doing for a minute and PRAYED FOR HIM to understand what he seeks for?

Eccelente! There is an example of this one verse (well 2) " For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead: And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for...

And you're right, not all Calvinists agree which brings up the Calvinist Uniformity Conundrum. According to Calvinist determinism God could establish everyone's belief system if He wanted to. That much must be admitted by the honest Calvinist. Therefore: THE CALVINIST UNIFORMITY...

You're right, Calvin was not the founder. SO "Calvinists" should be honest and stop calling it Calvinism, and start calling it "Augustinianism" and finally ditch the anachronism.

You've become so accustomed to the word "SOME" in Calvinism that now you have admittedly conceded that Calvin only taught SOME truth! You're getting there :)

Another example of Calvinists ripping Hebrews out of context. What is sanctified? Those who are SET APART, that' s what sanctification means. When do they get set apart? AFTER they are JUSTIFIED. This verse isn't talking about electing someone. Election is not part of the context AT ALL...