Search results

Just learning about the idea so I have some questions if any one can answer them: 1.) So far, everyone I have read (it hasn't been much) believes that one can throw away their Salvation...can apostacize, no OSAS. Is this necessary for this view? 2.) I have always taken a generally...

We shall indeed, I hope talk....in that, I would love for someone to explain that P.O.V. better to me sometime. I am ostensibly completely ignorant of it, and I have already developed a thought system which understands "election" as individual...Hence my move towards Molinism...But I am...

What is this??? A well thought out and direct argument straight from Scripture itself? Nosir....it must be false for some reason...I cannot tell you what it is yet...but it isn't "Corrective teaching" or something....somehow...this is wrong. I will lay my finger on why that is the case later...

The problem with the "No true Scotsman"....was that he didn't eat or like hagis, not that he would or wouldn't commit murder. Then again....as an erstwhile and wannabe Englishman, I think hagis ROCKS!!!

OHHH.......you have much to learn young padawan...We teach you :jesus:

Don't understand the analogy myself either....but, as far as the Godly righteousness of a pure "single-malt" is concerned......agreed whole-heartedly! Our Saviour would have touched nothing else. My contention is that Glenlivet....for it's price....is the smoothest and best single-malt on the...

No, most "Arms" or "non-Cals" do not believe this...most of them work (IMO) very hard to accurately express what is confessionally believed by Calvinists. On the other hand, most non-Cals believe that most Calvinists (as a rule) falsely represent their beliefs...This is either through pure...

No need to furnish them....if necessary, refer to my previous post which you are in fact quoting....I am, in fact, making a bald assertion, I am not deigning to defend it. I am not deigning to defend it because I believe that the truth of it is painfully obvious to any thinking person who...

Please quote him saying that in his own words then....If you fail to, (as I happen to know you will) Then cease being the false accuser that you are.

Precisely :thumbsup::wavey:

Quote then, a confessionally ARMINIAN website in lieu of Wiki for crying out loud!!! http://evangelicalarminians.org/ It never ceases to amaze me, when Calvinists literally define an alternative view from (I am not kidding) "monergism.com" And then they cry when those who disagree reject the...

Here is my problem with this statement....has anyone in fact, explored what "Pel" himself believed and from his own words....or has that term only been invented by detractors....there is very little (to date) known about what he believed....by most or all on this board, and I daresay, few have...

Can't yet say I have "changed" my views on things yet....but as a relatively new member however, some of my views have been called into question, and I have at least begun to "re-think" some of them....or at least modify them somewhat. I voted "Yes" in that, I think many who do not think they...

True...also hard to delineate what it means when one side of the argument insists on defining all terms on their own and only arguing based upon those definitions though.

Hmm... I fail to see why a "synergist" would refuse to admit to it. To date...two synergists have done so, and admitted as much. Thus far, two "synergists" have admitted to being, in fact, "synergists". I am a "synergist". There is no reason to deny so. Unless they fear that the term itself...