Search results

And the fact that it had to be "repented" of....means that there is no reasonable conversation possible betwixt yourself and anyone with an alternative point of view. It's o.k. to be a "Calvinist"............the problem is, that apparently, every "Calvinist" is an arrogant jerk who is incapable...

Every post you have ends with a ???? question-mark, is that because you honestly want an answer, or because you feel that this is a powerful rhetortical device? There is rarely anything you post, which has a ??? attached to it which has not already been belabored already. I have yet to see you...

I already have....as I haunt sites like his semi-regularly, and this OP is still making a mountain out of a mole-hill. If it were not the case that you were viewing it through the lense of Calvinist Polemic, and were unaware of it, then reading what he says, in context, whether you agree with...

It is not, it simply is not. No one, who is familiar with either Arminianism or Olson's particular views thinks, for one second, that Olson maintains that God "cant" do anything. You are appealing to ignorance and your poor reading comprehension then. I will not argue with that.

That is either sheer ignorance or an out-right lie. You pick.

The OP is an an example of the inevitable result of what one gets when one reads something (not in full, nor in overall context) by someone they disagree with and is in lieu of attempting to understand its author's intent as charitably as possible, is merely engaged in a witch-hunt. If one...

:laugh::laugh:Well, first, I think it's kind of funny actually. I laughed a little.:laugh: Hey, it's a pretty good one! Ever had that Evangelist who snapped his fingers every three seconds, demonstrating that someone, somewhere, was meeting their Maker, RIGHT THEN!! :thumbsup: I LOVE that...

Canady: I am sorry, but the OP is simply flawed on a couple of levels, this logic does not work. There is a category mistake. Certain flavors of Arminians do, but there are more flavours than that. You are considering only the "simple foreknowledge" view...there are others though. But...

They are older...that is the sum total of their claim to being "closer" to the original autographs. There are also two of them, two. They also disagree with each other in hundreds of locations in the gospels alone. Erasmus compiled thousands of manuscripts. Many were indeed not very old, but...

I will allow others to "live by faith" on this one. If you ever find ME in that particular situation....Please SHOOT! :wavey: BTW I just got it...You are in an engineer unit and you go by "Sapper"...(nice) :thumbs:

I'll buy this. It can also demonstrate that there often is glaring inconsistency between military personell in various pay-grades. I can imagine that NCO status, such as being a platoon-sergeant in ANY combat-arms related field, such as engineering, is much harder than the status of...

It appears...by many of the comments on here that few bothered to read the article as per standard procedure. The same way you put a pricetag on any job...find out the least amount that will be accepted to convince the necessary numbers of personnel to enlist and/or reenlist, and offer that...

She implied a "Slippery Slope"....but it is only "fallacious" if there is absent any reasonable expectation that the following results will occur. She might very well be able to present a perfectly well reasoned inductive argument to establish a probability that her results might occur....Such...

It does indeed speak of the chuch as the "body of Christ"...but what Scriptural Justification do we have for claiming that the "body of christ" indeed consists of: This is usually asserted and assumed. Where do the Scriptures define the "body of Christ" this way? Allow me to add this...

WOW!!!! Lunacy.....never heard that before so I followed some links....someone posted this on a forum... Perfect description.

.........Or how unintelligible this one is. Despite it's abuse of emoticons.

:laugh: You actually have no idea how self-defeating your post is here do you. It's kind of humorous....you are demonstrating the validity of my point, but you are unaware of it. :laugh: