Search results

Okay, that was funny.

Oh, I know. His stupidity needed to be addressed, if only to possibly wake up some brain cells.

Yep, Rev, made a bad quote encapsulation. Was in a rush. My bad. Comments were all to Zaac. Sorry.

And there ya go. Can't actually discuss the facts, so ignores them.

He said Saddam was a bad guy; then went on to say "You know what he did well? He killed terrorists." Saying someone did something well is usually considered praise; but no, he wasn't praising Saddam, he was praising how Saddam handled terrorists.

Well, now Matt Damon is saying he wants a ban on guns in America, too.... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/5/matt-damon-jason-bourne-star-calls-for-us-to-ban-g/

Zaac, you are unbelievable. You're letting your dislike of Rev cloud your judgment. Here are the facts. Clinton has been in government for more than 20 years. Being Secretary of State is NOT the first time she's had to deal with classified information. She had to sign non-disclosure agreements...

I wonder if CTB saw the news article today that France wants to copy our anti-terrorism agencies? I wonder why they're not trying to copy Australia's?

I was thinking too narrowly....

I guess CTB is gonna run away from this discussion. Par for the course. In the meantime, let's throw some more facts out for CTB to consider: Illinois gun laws require a Firearms Owner ID (FOID) for purchasing long guns, hand guns, or ammunition. Found in possession of a firearm without a FOID...

I, for one, would like to see CTB respond to Tom Cassidy's post. You see, it's not "stricter gun laws" that these people are after; what they really think/believe is that no citizen of a developed nation needs a gun. Therefore, what they're after is the abolishment of guns. No guns, no gun...

This was probably for the best. Consider what happened. He watched/listened to some videos about some books, without going back to the books to verify that what the videos said was true. But you refused to watch the videos, so you were unable to point out where they were untrue; and lost the...

He won't read the books, and you won't watch the videos. You should just unfriend him, and watch your blood pressure go down. But if you really want to refute him, you should watch the videos, then use your books to refute the videos point-by-point. Unless you're afraid your mind might be...

Only if you believe the House and the Senate would approve him as a judge.

Apparently there was a report of an active shooter; but was later determined to be a false alarm. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/andrews-air-force-base-under-lock-down-due-to-reported-active-shooter/

I like what Ann has said. If you can't change the parents, then why should the children suffer? But as for the government taking up the task .... I invite all to partake of a story attributed to Col Davy Crockett. http://www.theroadtoemmaus.org/RdLb/21PbAr/Pl/CrockettWlfr.htm

Those statistics are actual voting percentages. Sorry, but you don't get to dismiss facts. That's your refutation of facts? And you expect people to take you seriously? I present you actual voting percentages, and you dismiss them -- because they don't support your narrative. You're willfully...

(sigh) My apologies.... No, Darrell; your declaration is pure speculation. You hope Trump will be different, and you hope he will support the Christian agenda, and you hope he'll do something about abortion...but your only assurance is that he'll be held accountable by his political party...

Highlights, because our posts have become one-post-per-page.... A third-party vote indicates a disinterest in the issues? Au contraire, mein freund. A third-party vote is cast based on that individual's interest in particular issues, that they perhaps disagree with the primary candidates on...