Search results

Part 2: First, I apologize; perhaps I would have been clearer if I said "Trump is more obvious about it. Second, my statement was Trump was as much of a threat; typically, people interpret that to mean "equal." Third, what other candidate has ever revoked the press credentials of a news...

Darrell, seriously. I think you just like to argue. First, propaganda is covered by the fact that I provided 4 possible choices for the last voter. That voter, who represents the undecided, will weigh factors based on all the propaganda and other known facts and cast (or not cast) their vote...

I don't get it. Something that would have been an added protection for women, is called an undue burden. I'm with Rev 100% on this one.

I was keeping the numbers simple in order to keep the explanation simple. You're not actually refuting the math, just complaining about it. Um...how do you come to that roundabout conclusion? I based that statement off of Sanders supporters saying they would vote for Trump rather than Clinton...

You're being rude to Baptist Believer. Go back and read his explanation of why he's voting for Clinton, and refute his points.

The undecided voter is addressed as the 6th voter, Darrell. You know, the one I said has four choices? ONLY if you believe ALL democrats will vote democrat; and that democrats far outnumber those who would vote for Trump. Oh, wait; I already addressed that, too, when I said you had to make the...

I would ask you to re-examine your opinion. If Clinton follows the same strategy as Obama, then there is as much threat to the First Amendment as there is by Trump. Trump is just more obvious. Her actions regarding her personal email server, and the reasons she had it set up, are proof of this...

The math doesn't support this statement. Let's say you have six voters. Of the first five, 3 vote for Trump, and 2 vote for Clinton. As it currently stands, Trump is winning 60%-40%. The 6th person has 4 choices: 1) vote for Trump, making it 67%-33% (Trump wins) 2) vote for Clinton, making it...

LOL. I won't take that personally.

So what's the solution if you think the two evils are equivalent?

I'm reminded of when the people wanted a king, and were told they already had God; but they insisted they must have a king, so God gave them Saul. And we all know how that turned out.... The presumption that our God-given attributes to make a rationally reasoned choice means we must...

You missed the point entirely. Rolfe said he believes both Clinton and Trump are equally voting for sin. Do you still encourage him to vote for one sin over the other?

Rolfe, ITL - he answered. Ben - no one is sinless. But Jesus commanded the adulteress, Go and sin no more. The lesson is clear: none are sinless, but we can try to sin less. If Rolfe thinks voting for either Trump or Hillary is wrong, and he believes God is leading him that way--how can you...

Let's face it: if Trump is already compromising on the 2nd Amendment through his supporters, before he's even elected, thus negating one of his positions that he's riding the popular vote with -- what else can we expect him to "deal" after he becomes president? Just wish I had a viable...

Don't know the line, but I'm thinking it stops at Fantasy Island, Gilligan's Island, and Atlantis....

And thus, you have "liberal logic."

"The type of weapon".... Zaac, do you even know what type of weapon it was? Or did you fall for the media-hype line?

What, exactly, is the "right gesture of solidarity" they should make?

Well...the problem is that this is a "debate" forum. If you're not willing to clarify and enter into debate, then you're kinda missing the point of the forum....

savedbymercy?