Search results

Yes... let's put experts in quotes b/c you are the unbiased expert on all things correct. Fundies :rolleyes: In another vein, Rev. 3:14 has best been treated by G. K. Beale. Read his article, “The Old Testament Background of Rev 3.14.” New Testament Studies 42, no. 01 (1996): 133–52. This...

I'm not sure if this link was the one I read where you responded to his diving line show, but I read the first few paragraphs of that, and I stopped b/c you clearly did not hear JW very well. He said he was not popular. He was not referring to his book but the KJV issue at large. These kind...

As I said, his ordination is governed by his supremacy ("purpose of his will"). God is for his glory. He is motivated by it. His ordination conforms to that desire above all else. Is God glorified in ordaining that evil happen. Yes. Congratulations rescinded.

Congratulations. (think of the last thread I started ;)) Whatever you are looking for, we would all admit that in some sense, God does not get what he wants. I would argue that he gets what he ordains. And what he ordains is best qualified by his supremacy. I wonder... will this turn into...

Oh... it's just "dr" James Ach grinding his axe against the Doctrines of Grace... again and Again and AGAIN!!! PS-I am the triple threat for this guy... I'm neither a dispie, a king jimmie user, or a semi-pelagian. :tonofbricks:

So you have this extra bit of revelation from God and none if it involves wisdom in checking the school out?? YIKES! Maybe you deserve Crown College.

I actually think you are breaking the 3rd commandment. When I was learning Hebrew, read aloud, or quote the Shema, I substitute Adonai in place of YHWH. I try to use the divine name as little as possible. The way you use it, it lacks respect and reverence. You throw it around like a...

Actually, I think the term is more fluid and just means special. But you would know better than me.

The tuition is cut in half for those in the SBC (:D) And Ryrie was always emeritus. He visited and taught a class here and there. But I would put STS in the progressive disp. camp w/ Pettegrew. Either way, SEBTS still has a better faculty, better resources, and better... well everything.

So why do you always use Yah and not Yahweh??? It was rarely ever used in the OT as a name in itself and most often attached to other words and names. And why do you think the Father's name is Yah? YHWH can be applied to all members of the trinity, and I can offer Scripture to back that...

Just curious (and biased), but why would you go to STS when SEBTS is down the road (30 mins away in bad traffic)??? Does NC need another Bible college or seminary, a baptist one at that? No. SEBTS is more affordable and has a better faculty. Game. Set. Match imo

All those posts and yet you still failed to provide Scripture to back up your claim. Shocking! Iesous is simply a transliteration of Yehoshua. I've explained why the y's and the i's and the j's came about. If you don't want to hear the truth, then stay blind in your ignorance. That's what...

Show me where the Bible commands you to use the name Yeshua. In the original, you know... the text that is inspired, the name given was Iesous. At best, you can make that argument. But you have no Scriptural command citing 1) the command to use the word "yeshua" and 2) an actual place that...

Nice avoidance of the question. Where does the Bible command you to use an Aramaic form of a word not found in Scripture??? If inspiration applies to what is written, then you should be constrained to Iesous not Yeshua. You have no Scriptural mandate for this baseless conviction. FACT!

Can you chapter and verse that one??? I mean really, where does the Bible (HOT or GNT) say that the son's name is Yeshua? I see Iesous in the NT. You could make a typological argument for Yehoshua. But you think this Aramaic name is the end all be all. Do you have Scripture to back up this...

So why stop at names, if significance is your bag? You are missing so much when you restrict to an English translation. Just go all the way to Hebrew only. Otherwise, this is a mummer's farce.

I think you should be more concerned with breaking the 3rd commandment rather than the 4th. Jews were so cautious with the divine name, and you throw it around willy-nilly. I've seen no respect for it, no caution in its use or misuse. And to use the shortened form multiple times in one...

I forget what I am... if only there was something to remind me ;) :D

Like I said... a weird spelling of Jesus in Aramaic. Essentially, what they have done was fused the Hebrew version Yahoshua w/ the Aramaic Yeshua and made Yahshua. Buncha crackpots if you ask me.

If you are going to go with a weird spelling of the Aramaic version of Jesus name (which has no Scripture to go with it, btw), why not go with Messiah instead of Christ. If you use "christ" rather than Messiah or Meshiah, then it is the same thing as using "jesus." Also, since the text of...