Search results

Yes. The apostle Paul, at least, exposed a legal injustice perpetrated on him by Roman Government.

I have been involved in various "cold-calling" type door-to-door visitations, over the years, and neither I nor anyone else seemed to feel that we were "soliciting" in that I guess we felt that "soliciting" was an attempt to engage in commerce, and we were not. It may have something to do with...

This is a quandry that has bugged me for a long time....It does seem (on the one hand) that we should obey our Government authorities, and at the same time that one must fight to defend liberty/justice etc...Especially when you look at the American Revolution...It was not as though we were...

This is, no doubt, an amazing story if true: and we should definitely take this with a grain of salt. But I would not be so quick to pass judgement about the "primitiveness" of our ancestors: this is a uniquely post-modern conceit which often shows OUR ignorance more than theirs... First...

I don't understand this objection....the story itself serves as self-contained evidence of its truth....did you follow the links in the article to the original source? This was a story published initially in the Harvard Medical Journal 1917...It is here published in e-book form. This...

The Rubio Choice is tempting....but we worked hard in Florida to get him there, you people can't take him away....he belongs to us :mad: HMMMPPHH. :mad: That aside, he needs to stay in the Senate IMO...That is, if the GOP wants to gain control of the Senate, a very real possibility; A...

Pretty much how I feel...I would prefer to have it dumped at the landfill or left to rot in the forest....I guess we burn it.

I was going to pipe in....by saying something to this effect less succinctly than you did. It appears I no longer need too... so....:wavey::applause::thumbsup:

Hey....leave Barrack Obama out of this....:laugh: O.k. so what is the subtle difference? This is a distinction with no meaning...A little-league team has the "strength" to "oppose" the New York Yankees....they will also lose.....they also have the "power". Does not the Bible teach that we...

I stand corrected.......I would "mis-direct"

Yes.... I noticed that too....when did men enter the conversation...:laugh: Pretty soon, it will be a question of Repubs wanting to torture Cavalier King Charles Spaniels for fun: http://cdn-www.dailypuppy.com/media/dogs/anonymous/kiba_cavalier_king_charles_spaniel_01.jpg_w450.jpg...

There is no such thing......you are asking should she beieve in this at HER expense, or, the good people of Texas.....Government pays for nothing, as it generates no wealth....it can only sieze: 5. To take quick and forcible possession of; confiscate: seize a cache of illegal drugs...

Us dissenters honestly believe/believed this was a back-handed way of doing the same thing....sorry....granted...it assumes we thought ill of you, but well...I think we saw this as a backwards way of re-hashing the same argument, they are similar...and as we all know, Biblical Truth is secondary...

Yes, I am a fellow Dispy, good to know someone else is willing to "fragment" the revelation as the convenant types like to say. :rolleyes:

This is the most some of the most Calvinistic posting anywhere on BB if you are not careful...you are going to get Icono saying: :thumbsup::tongue3::applause::love2: are you a Calvinist???? Anyone who places their faith in Christ is saved.

But you would NEVER support anyone's freedom to spend or to not spend vis -a- vis your OP, their own money as they see fit and would prefer government to utilize force to requisition money from hard-working people to spend it (or waste it) as government (force by definition) sees fit...

We both clearly answered you: you just can't understand the answer, given your assumtion that the answer would be in the affirmative. Rev answered here: Unless, I mis-read you Rev...don't want to speak for you if I am mistaken. and I answered here: I even accounted for the fact that...

Not to parse words....but I never said OVER Abraham, I would not have...you are indeed correct... he was not. It's not critical though... No, fair enough, I know you are not a moral relativist. I was suggesting something about the logical conclusion of some of your statements... I was...

40 million??? surely you exaggerate here...now be honest.... isn't the number more along the lines of... "The Alan Gutmacher Institute, a leading proponent of abortion on demand, claims that there have been more than 50 million abortions in the U.S. since Roe Vs. Wade."...

:wavey::thumbsup::thumbsup::applause: What is this????? Do you have some kind of like....Biblical World-view or something????.....Weird...