Search results

There is nothing like 'hyper-calvinism', we only have consistent and inconsistent Calvinists. I will educate you on the difference as soon as you demonstrate you possess a teachable spirit. This thread deals with compatibilism. Restrict yourself to the subject else you will be guilty of...

Not everyone but sinners. Infants for instance don't deserve domination. Calvin agrees with you. He also adds that God authored Sin. For nothing happens except he decrees it. God wills ALL be saved. The Elect are those who receive God's gift.

You can do better than conflate a hollow theory with scriptures. Calvin invented a divine monster who masterminds a catastrophe by decree, and then attempts to undo/salvage it by more decrees. Caught in between are billions who will burn in hell as part of the plan

I know it's double negation. What's your point? That lunacy of external call to ALL but internal call/drawing to the Elect explains it. Does God not know that the external/general call is hopelessly ineffectual? He does. So don't wave that as evidence of attempting to save. He is only...

It's a cue for you to drop insults and sideshows,and focus on the subject or ship out, before you go bald after plucking all your hair in angst:) One thing I have never understood are forum members who jump into a thread they are uncomfortable with only to end up throwing tantrums. How often...

Irrelevant verbiage. This thread has specific scope; demonstrating that John Calvin charged God with authoring Sin. Quoting the entire bible is irrelevant and off topic. I don't need your verses, which are spam anyway. When I want to, I will invite them. Back to the subject. Who decreed the...

God determined beforehand that man would sin. He also determined to save some of those who he determined would sin. It follows that He damns everyone, then blames them before saving some of these. The sinner in hell is there because God predestined him to be there. Please interact with Calvin...

It gets worse; you purposefully ensured they would swim in the wrong direction. You efficacious determined this for your own 'glory' in saving some of them.

God presumably calls men because He Wills not that any be lost. But He being sovereign knows too well the call is not sufficient to save any. So now he selectively irresistibly 'draws'(gives revelation as the truth, and as such they can't but receive it) whom to save. God does not Will to save...

God is under no obligation to save nobody, and he does not even attempt to. What is dishonest is claiming that He died for everyone or he wants all saved. The double speak is nauseating. What's more, even the sinners were ordained to Sin including Adam. There is no reasonable excuse for...

Tell me

Irresistible grace however nicely framed still charges God with damning men Those who don't believe and perish as a result have never received revelation 'as truth' else they'd receive it unto their salvation.

Every cult member believes their leader teaches bible

So regardless of whether he determines or 'allows' or decrees, he gets what he WANTS done?

That's what SDAs believe about Ellen White

So what's the difference between decree,determine directly and allow? If you don't know, stop trolling

What is the difference between determine directly and permit? I can't believe you are this ignorant

Garbage has no historical context

What's the difference between 'determine directly' and 'permitted'?

Is God allowing the same as decreeing?