Search results

You do understand that my threads are exact quotes from Calvinist? If they can't represent Calvinism correctly, than who can?

So you do agree with Icon on No TULIP = No Sheep? And No Divine Enablement to believe Calvinism = No Sheep?

Thousand Hills ?? Don't recall you participating in any of my threads. Are you one of those who sit on the bench?

Is it different than original Calvinism? Reformed means Calvinism was reformed, no?

I have a good Calvinist friend, an elder in my church, whom I respect and we have good back and forths on these issues involving TULIP. He doesn't believe crazy things like you see here from Calvinist on the BB. He made the comment that this reformed theology needs to be wiped out, and said he...

I believe it is called allowing the full counsel of Scripture interpret Scripture. You appear to get tunnel vision.

As I said, the problem lies within your own camp of "Calvinist". The more a Calvinist attempts to defend TULIP the more they slip into the ultimate conclusions TULIP must lead them into, and then the arguing and fighting begins. Where do you think these arguments come from? Do you think the...

I think it is sad, AND AGAINST THE ADMONITION OF SCRIPTURE, to label oneself or another with anything other than Christian. Was John Calvin crucified for you? Was Jacob Arminius crucified for you? If these two men are in heaven I would suggest they are APALLED at their names being used as...

I agree! :thumbsup: I have been called a 1 pointer - good grief! Icon declares ALL Christians are Calvinist! Yeah, I would like to know what hyper means as well, because I see Calvinist call other Calvinist Hyper when they are posting much of the same as the one they are labeling a Hyper.

You have pinpointed the problem to your own OP. It is not the non Cals who divide the Calvinist, your camp is all over the place on these issues. Most of the objections non- Cals have to Calvinism is the camp's own infighting. I have been told many times that Calvinist agree on 98% of the...

Hmm...I was pretty sure Paul was speaking of TULIP here...:smilewinkgrin: Excellent post! :thumbsup:

Regardless of the NT teaching that the Spirit was not given until Jesus Christ was glorified? Regardless of the teaching of Jesus to His disciples of the pending Spirit shall be in you? I believe you believe these OT saints were regenerated because that is what Calvinism teaches and needs to...

One thing Calvinism did was to lay claim to the Doctrines of Grace as if they are unique to Calvinism. To call TULIP the Doctrines of Grace is tantamount to a Mormon calling Mormonism the Doctrines of Grace. The Doctrines of Grace belongs to the Bible ALONE. We ALL, even JWs, think we are...

He's not joking! Do you not know Christians are given the knowledge of the mysteries of the kingdom of God? Are you one of "them" it is not given?

Everyone has read your responses to these topics brother. You are the only one accusing me of twisting your words. In fact, when I repost those very responses what do you do? Triple and quadruple down standing by your comments. But then you come back on here declaring you have been...

I didn't??? It's the mysteries of the kingdom of God, correct? Which you believe is the list above, correct?

You missed the circumcising of the heart message. Also, we have Jesus defining the difference between with you and in you... The disciples were not born-again YET! Jesus speaks accurately when He speaks...shall be...not is in you!!

Well if you interpret this as regeneration, then you have a lot of scripture conflicting against itself. Scripture makes it pretty clear God said He was going to do a "New Thing". You believe it is the same old thing??

Oh, I forgot one... You become a Calvinist the same way you become a Christian - by Divine Enablement. Matt 13, I believe you quoted... So those who do not know Calvinism is true, it is not given them. And of course in keeping with the context of Matt 13...

All, ok..... (1) No belief in TULIP = No Sheep (2) TULIP = The Gospel (3) God hates the non-elect (4) If you do not believe any of these God has not Divinely enabled you. I'm sure there are many more, but these are the ones you been defending with 1Cor2...