Search results

Interesting can you provide some information on that? I've seen preterists in the second century. No futurist though. Not till 1800

Everything that denies God is Antichrist

Please answer my questions first to see how literal you actually believe prophecy.

So basically everyone was preterist until the reformation, then A historical approach came and the Catholic church Made up futurism, but just wrote down the widely held view of the early church preterism. Robycop3 History is a wonderful thing isn't it?

Preterism was one of, if not the earliest eschetalogical position of early Christians, written about as early as the third Century by Eusebius of Caeseria between 300 and 310 ad. From that point on the Church writers were nearly universally partial or full preterists. As rigid historicism and...

Please show me where it connects all of that.

Will you please show me where you get the gap in Daniel 9. Its a 490 year prophecy, not a 2,490 year. Why do you insist on a gap when its not biblically there?

That is correct, same with the complete idea of preterism, Im more of an idealist in revelations. I do believe much of it can be said about AD 70 but i also think it can be read in any date in any time. Most historical protestants thought the beast was the pope. I think each generation has its...

Im not quite sure what you are asking.

Ok before I can anwser we have to be clear on tis If you believe the "antichrist", the Biblical "man of Sin" and the Biblical "Beast" are one and the same individual, please provide as concise a scriptural analysis as you can to demonstrate this connection. if they they are synonymous, I...

I agree with you 100% on that one!

Where do you come up with that connection? Binding of Satan is just a restraint, he is powerless towards the gospel and christians, Where in the bible times he actually walked the earth, Satan can not stop the gospel from spreading, can't stop you from being a christian, he is restrained

Tell us where the antichrist is spoken of in the bible? The exact words, Literal words, no beast, no man of sin, but literal word antichrist, if you believe the bible to be literal then that should be easy. Thats *mark of*, and What is the beast, show me the connection to the "antichrist" It...

Very well said.

I explained WHY I said that, because his first ever response to me was the fact that its COMMON SENSE, AND HOW PHONY it is. What kind of argument is that? How can you possibly debate something normally with someone doing that in every response, its irritating. A childish argument, gets a...

If any moderator wants to delete this whole topic, I can start over, if I seemed to step on some of your toes, over Robycops comments.

I apologize, If i came about bashing him. I did not refute him in the same matter, I brought up facts and he didn't want to listen. and all i get in return is phony as a ford corvette. That right there just irks me how can you even start to have a normal debate? Thats the only reason I said he...

So robycop3, Quick question if everything is literal Explain this verse. Ecclesiastes 1:4 Generations come and generations go, but the earth remains forever.

If you read war of the Jews Matthew 24 is completely explained. But you already stated you don't believe it. So there is nothing your closed mind will understand. And show me one more instant in Matthew where he talking about future generations. The whole book is about the current generation the...

I know, but these things are not important to salvation. Its just enjoyable, It would be better if actually could back stuff up instead of saying phony as ford corvette, it just shows ignorance instead of truly wanting to know what the bible says. But then again, I respect every ones view here...