Search results

No reason to - after all it's on the "0"'s watch, ergo, it's hunky-dory!!:BangHead::BangHead:

Well, JWP is one who believes that this "war of northern aggression" was fought precisely for that reason! So much for Rush's beliefs! Incidentally, why did you post Rush's beliefs on this topic?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/25/AR2009042501870.html Somebody once asked the question "Do you think any people have regretted their decision to vote for Obama?" This site answers that question for some, but how many? Based on various responses on this board, I...

If the reasons he gave aren't true, JC, then from your liberal vantage point, please explain the reasons for the points the author made.:confused: (Incidentally, you DO make a good suggestion! :laugh::laugh::laugh:)

And some on here wonder why we say they "worship" the big "0"!!!!!!

I used to wonder how the AC could deceive so many, but after seeing the following of the "0", I am still dumbfounded at the gullibility of so many, but am no longer surprised! This site gives some interesting input as to the dedication the "0"'s have toward their "messiah" - with all evidence...

You know, it was another POTUS Democrat (HST, but totally different from the Ds of today--!!) that had the famous motto on his desk, "THE BUCK STOPS HERE!" As Donna sez: Needless to say, it's obvious to me (and any common senser)which it is!

Reading comprehension, JC, reading comprehension! Reading comprehension, JC, reading comprehension! Reading comprehension, JC, reading comprehension! Reading comprehension, JC, reading comprehension! Nothing else seems to work; tho't I'd try repetition!!:BangHead:

I once read a comment to the effect that: "If Sen. McCain sat down without warning, Sen. Graham would then have a broken nose!" Applying that same thought to the "0" minions, how many of this board's liberals would figuratively be in the same situation as Sen Graham?? Based on many of the...

What the next president (assuming that there will be one?) will carry before his name is immaterial! Unless he is a true conservative, this nation is still headed for the swamp. Only difference will be the speed and demeanor with which it's done! Right now it's at warp speed and like a...

Emphasis mine JC, this is one of the few statements that you've made that I agree with. 'Course this has been going on for some time now ( since FDR at least), and now the present pOTUS is accelerating this demise at warp speed! I am truly amazed and pleased that you have acknowledged the...

Which has exactly what to do with the topic? I have personally seen many of the "conservatives" here post harsh negatives re: Bush, so what does that have to do with what "0" is doing now?????? "0" is now pOTUS, not Bush, and if it was bad for Bush to do it, how can you mix up your priorities...

Dare I say, that should, may God forbid, church attendance become illegal by act of congress effective 8:00 AM Sunday morning coming, how many of the members of this board would suddenly have many and varied reasons, er-r-r- excuses, NOT to attend church that day? Now I realize that this topic...

Congratualations JC, you got half this quote correct - that's a .500 batting average. Much better than your usual!! :thumbs: Keep up the progress & you just might be worth listening to after a couple more years! :D

I can imagine that it's sorta like the response of the POWs to Hanoi Jane; seeing your hope shredded like a junk-yard dog would do to a hunk of sirloin.

100% agreement here. Bush was as much (well, almost anyway) a Globalist as the "0", BUT, the "0" has reversed policy on those agendas (Abortion funding fer instance) that he didn't agree with, so, SO, if he refuses to invalidate this policy, then he is in fact agreeing with it. It seem that the...

Sure is quiet on the "0" front!! Have no fear; soon's the D HQ sends the appropriate talking points (just gotta get the right spin on it) we'll hear from his worshipfulness's following!

From Chuck Smith: Emphasis mine This just corresponds to a saying I heard long ago that says the same as the bolded sentence: "You are free to choose, BUT you are not free to choose the consequences of your choice!" Unfortunately, too many read only the first phrase of this quote and totally...

Sorta makes his bowing to the Arab a bit more understandable now, eh wot??? :mad::mad::mad::mad:

Seems DHK continues to prove the point I made in my last post on this thread; #278 To continue to try to reason with such an opposing attitude is just "casting the pearls before the swine"!:rolleyes::rolleyes: