Search results

Once again we see advocates for the dark age fallacy offering mindless twaddle instead of a biblically based response. No one said or suggested the gospel message must be perfect in order for the lost to place their faith and devotion in Christ. So another deflection hoisted to hide the fact...

Once again those holding views from the dark ages offer mindless response to the evidence presented. Post #4 - denial Post #5 - absurd claims without basis in reality Post #6 - Copy and re-post devoid of response Actual biblical response: 1) Did anyone say they had not received "knowledge...

1) Did anyone say they had not received "knowledge of the truth?" Nope so obfuscation 2) Did anyone say they had not be set apart (sanctified) under the New Covenant? Nope so obfuscation 3) Did anyone say they had committed "any old sin?" Nope so obfuscation 4) What was their sin...

1) These advocates of false doctrine change the subject to the meaning of "grace" then deny that was a change of subject. 2) The fact is that born anew believers are to be intolerant of false doctrine. See the OP. 3) No one said or suggested the gospel message must be perfect in order...

More of the same insult posts, no effort to address the topic. Take note all of you who think the alternate view might have a basis in scripture. It does not. Every point except once saved always saved, must be read into scripture. No one seeks God becomes no one ever seeks God, the natural...

This passage follows the Hebrews 10:19-25 passage where we are to live according to our faith and faithfulness to the gospel in which we placed our trust and devotion. Then in our passage the alternate is presented, where people rejected or were not fully committed to the gospel are described...

Yet another "change the subject" post to their opponent's beliefs. This is all they ever offer, defection and absurdity. Scripture says false doctrines matter, but the alternate view denies that reality.

Yet another "change the subject" post to their opponents qualifications. This is all they ever offer, defection and absurdity. Scripture says false doctrines matter, but the alternate view denies that reality.

More claims for fiction, no biblical support offered. Ask yourselves why do the proponents not realize they bought an empty sack? God created time as part of His creation of our universe. That simply does not address Revelation 6:10, where the passage of time exists in the spiritual kingdom...

There doctrines are simply the copy and paste views from the dark ages. I consider them the "Doctrines of Disgrace." They are defended not with rational posts, but with absurdity and insult. For example with total spiritual inability is true, and it is not, then the gospel message would not...

Ecclesiastes 1:9 NASB What has been, it is what will be, And what has been done, it is what will be done. So there is nothing new under the sun. Does this verse suggest the future may be completely predestined? Nope Rather it teaches that the things done by humans in the past will be repeated...

God has mercy of those whose faith He chooses to credit as righteousness, but He does not compel that person's belief.

God has no beginning, He always existed. God has no end, He will always exist. Do these truths support the idea that God's spiritual realm does not have sequence, first this, then that? Nope. It has been made up and then falsely claim. The souls in God's realm were aware of the passage of...

Here we have the false doctrine of time travel theology. There is no basis in scripture for these science fiction claims. Here the fiction is being offered as the instrument to nullify scripture. God supposedly knows the future, but this does not predestine that foreknown future. Poppycock...

Our last Greek word, "Exagorazo" is a compound word that always means to buy out of the control of another. It is mistranslated as "redeem" by most English translations, but the actual contextual meaning is simply to obtain control and utilize as desired. The word (G1805) appears 4 times in...

The rest of the response posts were all either petty insults or change of subject dodges. This is all the alternate view can post as scripture is crystal.

No the context does NOT say "everyone who believes" it says "everyone who believes into Him!!!!!!!!!!!" Big difference!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1) The Greek word translated by your translation version is "pas" and the KJV translates it as "everyone" 28 times. Either you do not know what you are talking about, or you are deliberately posting falsehood. 2) The classification criteria of "pas" is everyone who believes into Him. The...

1) Still addressing your views about me, and hiding from any defense of your mistaken views. 2) One of the constant requirements of the mistaken view is to claim it is not what it is. However, not of these constant dodges ever get around to stating what it is. :) 3) Yet another...

Jesus was God incarnate!, the uniquely divine Son of God. Christians should stick with what they first believed in, "for God so loved the world (all of mankind) that He gave His uniquely divine Son so that whoever (and God has not foreordained who can believe) believes into Him shall not perish...