For the elect, yes.So Jesus only died for Paul and those at Corinth ?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
For the elect, yes.So Jesus only died for Paul and those at Corinth ?
Try answering the question.The atonement doesn't glorify anyone.
Universal atonement means that all humans are made holy. Does God fail to save those whom He has made holy and perfect?
So, a fully perfect and holy person may not be glorified (is flawed) and thus can be sent to hell?Glorification is what’s limited, not atonement. (Rom. 3:23; 8:17-30)
When Christ said, “It is finished,” on the cross, everyone was still in their sins as per 1 Cor. 15:17.
Atonement is one component of many components in salvation. It alone is not what saves. (Tit. 3:5; Rom. 5:10)
Atonement is a prerequisite for salvation, not the execution of it. (Rom. 5, 8; 2 Cor. 5; Tit. 3:5).
The Atonement must be received. (Rom. 5:11, 17; Jn. 1:12; 1 Cor. 15:1-4)
The Atonement does not glorify anyone. (Rom. 8)
What Calvinists call “the golden chain of redemption” contains no direct reference to the atonement. (Rom. 8:29-30)
Belief that salvation for anyone was secured on the cross constitutes a denial of the necessity of the resurrection (1 Cor. 15:17)
Salvation is eternally secured by the sealing of the spirit, not “election.” (Eph. 1:13-14; 4:30; 2 Cor. 1:22)
So, atoning sacrifice doesn't make a person holy before God? Is your version of atonement a worthless act of God? It seems you think Jesus died in vain. Perhaps you think Jesus blew it because his death didn't function as an atoning sacrifice and propitiation for sin.No it doesn't. Where did you get this definition?
Why do you ask of me questions yet continue to ignore mine.
Quantrill
So, atoning sacrifice doesn't make a person holy before God? Is your version of atonement a worthless act of God? It seems you think Jesus died in vain. Perhaps you think Jesus blew it because his death didn't function as an atoning sacrifice and propitiation for sin.
Quantrill, define your version of atonement for us.
You do not understand this at all.He doesn't limit the efficacy of the atonement. All sins are paid for.
He doesn't limit the atonement as it provided exactly what God wanted. All sin is paid.
Though the atonement is made, men are not saved. Men are saved only if faith is exercised, moving them from the First Adam to the Last Adam.
If men refuse Christ, then they remain in their sins in the First Adam.
Quantrill
Got it, you refuse to look at your contradictions.Again, why do you ask of me questions yet ignore mine?
Go ahead and build your strawman. Use it as a pinianta for your ilk.
Quantrill
I don't need the link. I have Pinks book. (An Exposition of Hebrews, Arthur Pink, Baker Book House, 1979) I see nothing in conflict with what I have said with Pink.
I don't think you understand what I said, or even really read what I said. I am not a universalist. Pink said, (p.139), concerning (Heb. 2:16), "This verse presents an insoluble difficulty to those who believe in the universality of God's love and grace." Pink goes on to say, (p. 140), "They insist that justice as well as mercy demanded that He should die for all of Adam's race."
I agree, except I see it as "lost" ( wayward sheep, Isaiah 53:6, Matthew 18:11, Luke 19:10, 1 Peter 2:25 ), but not lost as in "perishing".
We are posting about two different things.
I am posting about an accomplished redemption, and an atonement that actually saves who it is intended to save. I am posting of an actual propitiation, not a potential one.
prophecy70,
"[]It's funny that Christ, nor any of the apostles, ever warned us to be careful to generalize the Gospel so we don't actually lie. Rather, they used the worst possible word choices to convey a limited atonement:]
They did not have to.They spoke very clearly on the design of the atonement.
jn10 :11 identifies the identity of the Good Shepherd,and who he gives his life for.
The sheep, His sheep, He seeks and saves them.Every one of them.
Not one is lost. jn 10:14,15
Paul understood completely...Acts 20:28.....to shepherd the Church of God which he purposed with His own blood.
So you and the Bible are talking about two different things? All I did was present the Bible verses that seem overwhelming universal in nature.
But Peter didn't have it figured out?
2 Peter 2:1
You listed several fine verses but they do not demonstrate what you suggest;2 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
No you didn't understand my position.I understand your position is massively conflicted and thus it is not what God teaches.
Do you believe you have to endure to the end to be saved ?Always you preach merited, works salvation.
One of the main reasons I moved away from Calvinism was because of its subtle works ' based ' salvation. On the surface it looks like eternal security but how it plays out , is Lordship ' works ' salvation.Always you preach merited, works salvation.
Ok, this is where calvinism will confuse you. The only way you will see it ,is when you see the system is nonsense. The Atonement does not glorify anyone does it? No one was ' made ' perfect 2000 years ago when Jesus said " it is finished " . You were still lost , correct? Still heading for hell ,without God and without Hope . Eph 2.11 -12 .Then all are saved or God sends perfect people to hell. Which one?
People go to hell because the only way to avoid hell is glorification. Only those regenerated will be glorified. The Atonement doesn't regenerate anyone . God regenerates a person after he believes. Because this pleases God .Then all are saved or God sends perfect people to hell. Which one?