It shows that I don't automatically side with the white guy. It shows that I let reason prevail, instead of emotion.
I never said that YOU did. And a lot of time reason needs to take a back seat with emotion so that we don't deal from a bias. What's reasonable from your perspective may not be so from someone else's experience.
Facts are facts. There's no 'version' of facts. Fact = truth.
Fact = a version of the truth based on perspective. Your fact does not have to equal somebody else's fact. i.e the view of racial prejudice and racism from police in this country.
Truth will always be the same.
Now, iI'll grant that there are some facts we don't know, and those unknown facts can skew our opinion. But it's the ignoring of facts that irks me. If the black community wants to show a "systemic execution", then they need actual wrongdoings as their banner. Ferguson is a prime example. People jumped all over it with "hands up, don't shoot" then it turns out he didn't have his hands up, and in fact assaulted the officer.
That is what it is. He was still unarmed and people will make a thousand "reasoned" replies for why the officer had to shoot him.
Are they shooting unarmed white men the same way? Again just looking at some high profile situations and it appears that cops do everything they can to not shoot the white assailants.
As a general rule, nothing that white people do gets them shot by law enforcement.
Not walking around in a big box store with semi-automatic weapons (though standing in one with an air rifle gets you killed if you’re black); not assaulting two officers, even in the St. Louis area, a mere five days after Mike Brown was killed; not pointing a loaded weapon at three officers and demanding that they—the police—”drop their f****** guns;” not committing mass murder in a movie theatre before finally being taken alive; not proceeding in the wake of that event to walk around the same town in which it happened carrying a shotgun; and not killing a cop so as to spark a “revolution,” and then leading others on a two month chase through the woods before being arrested with only a few scratches.
If one is going to try and show more than mere coincidence, they need a LOT more of these coincidental occurrences. And they need more than raw data about how many blacks are killed by police each year. A more meaningful stat would be how many are wrongfully killed each year.
Difficult to apply wrongfully killed as an FBI stat when you've got prosecutors who don't want to prosecute the officers with whom they work everyday. The system is broken and I'm surprised no one has ever mentioned that glaring conflict of interest that bypasses due process.
I tell you what, Zaac, you show me numbers that say more black deaths are wrongful in direct proportion to the percentage of crimes they commit, and I will openly issue an apology and admit there's a problem.
What would showing you numbers of wrongful deaths at he hands of police officers prove when prosecutors aren't prosecuting the police officers?
You don't have to admit there is a problem.
As I've said repeatedly, white privilege has created an epidemic sized blind spot in the eyes of a lot of white Americans. You don't have to admit that there is a problem for there to be one.
The genie is out of the bottle and the WORLD sees that there is indeed a problem.