Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not at all. Remember that prophetic language is often NOT literal. Even the most ardent "literalists" have a long track history of interpreting locusts as modern jet fighters, etc.Alright, if forever does not mean literally forever, then there is not really any eternal life, is there?
It’s not optimism, it is careful hermeneutics. Each type of literature found in the Bible has a different method of interpretation. We are very literalistic in Western culture because of the influence of the Enlightenment. We need to recognize that people in other eras and cultures thought quite differently than we do, and the prophetic vernacular is quite different than the pastoral letters. Apocalyptic literature (like Revelation) uses an amalgamation of prophetic allusions to a previous body of literature that the original audience is quite familiar with to help them interpret the complex message.I don't go for this optimistic theology that says if you want it to be literal it is, and if you don't it ain't.
Not allegory. It is a style of prophetic speaking. How can we know this? Simply look to how God judged Edom. Edom was utterly destroyed, however, there is no column of smoke rising into the heavens forever. If you want to take Isaiah literally, then you have to claim that either Isaiah was wrong, the scripture is wrong, Edom exists in another reality, or the smoke rises, but no one can detect it (which is kind of silly for a warning to others).But I can't take the passages, such as Rev. 14 and Luke 16, and say they're only allegories...
Of course not. Genesis 12 and following give no indication that Abraham is anything but a historical figure.if I don't think that about being in comfort with; Abraham (and is he an allegorical character in scripture?).
Of course not. Genesis 12 and following give no indication that Abraham is anything but a historical figure.
That's the actual language of what the passage ( Revelation 14:9-11 ) states...Yes, that's the prophetic language of eternal destruction derived from the Isaiah 34 reference of the destruction of Edom:
Respectfully, you may understand it any way you wish.Therefore, we have to understand that Isaiah is not being literal, but speaking in a prophetic vernacular, that God's judgment was coming upon Edom and it would be devastating.
John was revealed something by the Lord Jesus Christ...Going back to the allusion to Isaiah 34 in Revelation 14, John is using the prophetic vernacular to say that the destruction of these persons who knowingly betray God by siding with the beast will be destroyed.
"Hermeneutics"?It’s not optimism, it is careful hermeneutics. Each type of literature found in the Bible has a different method of interpretation.
Men and women are men and women, no matter what culture or level of technology was or is prevalent.We need to recognize that people in other eras and cultures thought quite differently than we do, and the prophetic vernacular is quite different than the pastoral letters. Apocalyptic literature (like Revelation) uses an amalgamation of prophetic allusions to a previous body of literature that the original audience is quite familiar with to help them interpret the complex message.
"Father Abraham" in the parable that Jesus told, was a reference to a historical person. However, the parable is not historical in itself. The parable is not about being rich, but about being rich AND unconcerned about the poor.Is he a historical figure in Luke 16? How about Lazarus and that rich man? And why is Abraham, himself quite a rich man, telling another rich man he is tormented there because he had his good things in his lifetime, while Abraham did too? Do you think Abe was answering questions from a dead-- not tormented-- man, who can't ask him any?
Some translators of the Bible, including the influential King James Bible, made a mess of things by translating several different words (with different meanings) as hell. And no, hell is not the final destination of the "unsaved" -- the lake of fire is the final destination -- "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death." (Revelation 20:14)Hell is the final destination for all those not saved by the Lord...
We have already talked about Revelation 14.Respectfully, you may understand it any way you wish.
I understand that if the Bible says that people will suffer eternal torment in the lake of fire, as in Revelation 14...
Revelation 20:14 says it is the "second death," not torment (see 20:14). In fact, torment is not mentioned anywhere in chapter 20....Revelation 20...
Revelation 21:8 ALSO says "the second death," and torment is not mentioned anywhere in chapter 21....and Revelation 21...
Yes, the Bible is clear. You are misusing it....then it means it.
Salvation is eternal life. Those who are unsaved do not have eternal life. Humankind is not inherently immortal.That's why it sobers me greatly... and I view His salvation of my worthless hide as something that is very special, kind and merciful in the light of it.
Hermeneutics - the study of the general principles of biblical interpretation. For both Jews and Christians throughout their histories, the primary purpose of hermeneutics, and of the exegetical methods employed in interpretation, has been to discover the truths and values of the Bible."Hermeneutics"?
Not necessarily, but unless you think the world of the Bible was the same as ours (culture, language, technology, worldview, cultural assumptions, politics, social structure, religious influences, etc.), then you are going to have to interpret things keeping all those things in mind. Even in the same culture, we interpret words in various ways, according to who is saying it and the context of how it is said. Biblical hermeneutics (interpretation) is not a "code," but a helpful series of things to keep in mind as we study the scriptures.Do you mean to tell me that I have to learn a man-made "code" ( or practice a "method of interpretation" ) in order to properly read and understand the Scriptures for myself?
Having read your post above carefully, I agree with you on the final resting place of those who are not saved;Some translators of the Bible, including the influential King James Bible, made a mess of things by translating several different words (with different meanings) as hell. And no, hell is not the final destination of the "unsaved" -- the lake of fire is the final destination -- "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death." (Revelation 20:14)
Yes, I saw where you did that.We have already talked about Revelation 14.
I disagree.Revelation 20:14 says it is the "second death," not torment (see 20:14). In fact, torment is not mentioned anywhere in chapter 20.
I agree.Revelation 21:8 ALSO says "the second death," and torment is not mentioned anywhere in chapter 21.
I agree that you see it one way and I see it another.Yes, the Bible is clear. You are misusing it.
Eternal life is defined as knowing God the Father and His Son per John 17:3,Salvation is eternal life. Those who are unsaved do not have eternal life. Humankind is not inherently immortal.
You should probably check again, because Jesus clearly engaged in it with his disciples."Hermeneutics"?
Please forgive my seeming lack of respect, but I don't recall seeing anywhere in the Bible that word, or even the concept.
Yes. All of us do.Do you mean to tell me that I have to learn a man-made "code" ( or practice a "method of interpretation" ) in order to properly read and understand the Scriptures for myself?
Maybe not, but your hermeneutical method is random and untrained.I'm sorry, but I don't know of anywhere in God's word that the believer is told that they are to be dependent upon such things...
Well, Jesus engaged in the practice, so........So, no "hermeneutics" needed...
That's pretty bad hermeneutics.Only the Holy Spirit ( 1 Corinthians 2:6-16, 1 John 2:20-27 ), provided by the Lord to all those that truly believe on Him.
I clearly see that eternal torment is not mentioned in Revelation 20:14, but it is in both Revelation 14:9-11 and Revelation 20:10, which I will post again for the reader to carefully consider below:
" And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive [his] mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10 the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
11 and the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name." ( Revelation 14:9-11 )
To me, this clearly states that a group of people will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and the Lamb ( Jesus Christ ).
Questions for the reader:
The smoke of that torment shall rise up...for how long?
For ever and ever.
They shall have no rest from that torment... for how long?
For ever and ever.
You have made some huge assumptions here. You have interpreted "the beast" to be a man instead of a nation/political power. Revelation is drawing on Daniel's visions of the beasts (see Daniel 7-8) which represented kingdoms (specifically, the Babylonian Empire, the Medo-Persian Empire, the Greek Empire, and the Roman Empire). You have also interpreted the "AntiChrist" in a common, but likely unbiblical way. John's three epistles (1, 2, 3 John) mention "antichrists," not a singular figure. There is a mention of the man of lawlessness (see 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4, 7-10), but that is likely a reference to Roman Emperor (Caesar/Kaisar/Lord), the one who has declared himself to be divine. The Emperor Caligula attempted to have a statue of himself placed in the Temple somewhere around 40 AD. The Jews resisted it and Caligula died, so it didn't happen. However, the symbolism of that event was not lost on the contemporary readers of Revelation. They were facing severe persecution, and it was going to get worse. The number of the beast (616/666), "is the number of a man," and represents Nero who embodied the entire Roman government. (Note: In Greek the letters of "Nero Kaisar" added together is 616. In Hebrew, the letters of "Neron Kaisar" add up to 666.) The many antichrists (false messiahs) and false teachers are represented by these figures in Revelation." And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. " ( Revelation 20:10 )
In the above,
I clearly see that both the devil and at least two men ( the "beast" or Anti-Christ and his false prophet ) are going to be cast into the lake of fire and brimstone and shall be tormented day and night forever and ever.
I need to point out that you are NOT taking the passage literally. It says in no uncertain terms that the lake of fire is the "second death." The first death is of the body. The second is of the soul. ("And do not be afraid of those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." - Matthew 10:28) The image is destruction. Look at the metaphor that John the Baptist used in speaking of Jesus (“As for me, I baptize you with water; but He is coming who is mightier than I, and I am not fit to untie the straps of His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. His winnowing fork is in His hand to thoroughly clear His threshing floor, and to gather the wheat into His barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.” - Luke 3:16-17) The chaff is not being tortured, it is being consumed ("burned up"). Jesus uses a similar metaphor in His parable of the wheat and the tares. ("...at the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers, “First gather up the weeds and bind them in bundles to burn them; but gather the wheat into my barn.” - Matthew 13:30). His disciples were confused, so He interpreted it plainly, clearly explaining that the weeds/tares are people:Where shall both death and Hell, as well as anyone not found written in the Book of Life ( written from the foundation of the world, see Revelation 17:8 ) be cast?
Scripture again answers that question:
" And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire." ( Revelation 20:14-15 ).
There it is, in no uncertain terms...
at least, if one is believing the words as they are laid out on the page, and literally.
The second death ( being cast into the Lake of Fire ) is reserved for whosoever was not found written in the Lamb's Book of Life.
Putting it all together, I see that the second death is the Lake of Fire where the smoke of the devil's torment, the smoke of the people who received the mark of the beast and their torment, plus the beast and the false prophet's torment, rises up forever and ever.
If we are going to take this passage from Revelation literally, then you should already know that their body has already died (the first death) and now their soul dies (the second death). This is ONLY talking about the second death.Eternal life is defined as knowing God the Father and His Son per John 17:3,
therefore it is a spiritual thing and an everlasting relationship between the saved and the Lord.
Those who are not saved do not enjoy that everlasting life ( John 3:16, John 3:36, John 5:24 ), that spirit to Spirit relationship....
But rather, the wrath of God abides on them.
However, this does not mean that those who are spiritually dead will not be alive, physically, at the judgment or in the fires of Hell.
I'm not that concerned about the Late Middle English meaning of "worm," since that is just a translation. In the Hebrew for this passage, the word (ṯō·w·la‘·tām) means "maggot," and in the Greek (σκώληξ --> skōlēx), a worm that feeds upon dead bodies (a maggot).Please see Matthew 25:30, Matthew 25:46, Mark 9:43-48 ( "worm" is the Late Middle English term for "remorse" or something that gnaws the conscience, as well as the term that describes someone that is debased and despised)
Yes, the lake of fire is the place of death. That has never been in question."And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone." ( Revelation 19:20 ).
Please cite a passage where it teaches that human beings are eternal, either soul or spirit, outside of a saving relationship with God. I have yet to see one in 35 years of careful study of the scriptures. The closest thing I've ever found is in Ecclesiastes 3:11, where the Preacher states that God has "set eternity in the human heart, yet no one can fathom what God has done from the beginning to end." But that is talking about our innate perception that we were intended to live eternally, but death is the reality of life. Even Adam and Eve had the tree of life to sustain them (it reappears in Revelation 22:2 to provide for life and the "healing of the nations").I see God's word teaching that all human beings have an eternal soul and spirit...
@Baptist Believer:
In summary and from my point of view,
You appear to believe that not only were we as believers in Jesus Christ not saved from everlasting punishment and God's eternal wrath, which consists of terrible suffering and torment,
But that we as believers in Jesus Christ need more than the Holy Spirit ( 1 Corinthians 2:6-16, 1 John 2:20-27 ) and His preserved word ( Romans 15:4, 2 Timothy 3:15-16 ) in order to know what we have been freely given in the way of God's gifts.
In addition,
Instead of historic Baptist teachings and confessions on this subject:
The Second London Baptist Confession of Faith
The Philadelphia Confession of Faith
The New Hampshire Confession of Faith
and many more, which include these points:
1) ... that all men will be resurrected, in their bodies, to live eternally
2) ... some with the Lord which is the first resurrection unto life ( see Revelation 20:4-6 ), and
3) ... most in the Lake of Fire, which is a place of everlasting torment and the second death which are separated by a thousand years ( see Revelation 20:7-15 )...
I believe i am in agreement with scripture. Seventh Day Adventists, and others, are correct in this one area. They began in the middle of the 19th century, when the conditional mortality/annihilationist view was nearly the most popular viewpoint. In fact, the "traditional view" of hell gained dominance again after World War II, when the crimes of the Axis nations were laid bare. If you look at the 1925 Baptist Faith and Message (Southern Baptist confession), you will notice that they did not give a definitive position on the fate of the wicked, since there was likely a broad difference of opinion....You are instead in agreement with comparable Seventh Day Adventist and others' teachings.
We are saved from eternally perishing. Read John 3:16, it is the most famous example of the theme throughout scripture, contrasting eternal life and perishing/death.If this is accurate, then I thank you for clarifying that.
If it is not, then I ask that you please clarify what it is that the believer is saved from, if not eternal suffering and wrath in the Lake of Fire...as it seems to me that it is "annihilationism" that you are in agreement with and are teaching.
"Father Abraham" in the parable that Jesus told, was a reference to a historical person. However, the parable is not historical in itself. The parable is not about being rich, but about being rich AND unconcerned about the poor.