• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Are all already condemned by God, or ONLY after rejecting Christ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So now it is uncalled for to disagree with YOUR understanding of Scripture...unless you are claiming to have written it? Win man has not only NOT denied any scripture you and others have given, he patiently has dealt with each and every one from how he understands it. You have falsely accused him (me and pretty much everyone else who doesn't agree with you) time and time again. This is wrong.

Webdog,

You have read Winman post this on eccl 7:29 as many times as I have,You know it does not mean what he claims it does.How come you have never interacted with Him and pointed it out to him...even if it was by pm?
I do not mind if anyone disagrees as long as they do so without wresting and mangling verse after verse.
This was just one example.You know we do not agree on romans 3;23/and romans 5;12......where you do your Augustine defense thing.
Can you show me from what I posted how you do not see it as it is written?
Hos has just failed to do so once again.

Winman openly has addressed his concerns to me,and said I am in error.I have done the same with him.Percho was getting frustrated with winmans circular rabbit trails and asked for help.I offered an explanation that quite frankly is true. You do not agree....so be it:wavey:

Could you address my response earlier to Hos....
All sinned at one point in time....that time is identified as at the fall.

Can you explain why you believe this verse does not mean what it says?

3:23...all sinned
 

MB

Well-Known Member
Webdog,

You have read Winman post this on eccl 7:29 as many times as I have,You know it does not mean what he claims it does.How come you have never interacted with Him and pointed it out to him...even if it was by pm?
I do not mind if anyone disagrees as long as they do so without wresting and mangling verse after verse.
This was just one example.You know we do not agree on romans 3;23/and romans 5;12......where you do your Augustine defense thing.
Can you show me from what I posted how you do not see it as it is written?
Hos has just failed to do so once again.

Winman openly has addressed his concerns to me,and said I am in error.I have done the same with him.Percho was getting frustrated with winmans circular rabbit trails and asked for help.I offered an explanation that quite frankly is true. You do not agree....so be it:wavey:

Could you address my response earlier to Hos....
All sinned at one point in time....that time is identified as at the fall.

Can you explain why you believe this verse does not mean what it says?

3:23...all sinned

Why is it you don't understand what Winman wrote. You know the Bible says in the last days men would rather believe a lie rather than the truth. I suppose this is why you can't believe the simple truth.
MB
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
HeirofSalvation;
I accept the plain truth of both passages....Romans chapter 5 has been discussed already in some detail....Your statements about chapter 3:23 are loaded with supposition and presumption.
I think there is no other way to biblically see it, no matter what theology you claim.

This is mere trash-talk...I am not whining, but you clearly get upset when we do not all bow to your "correction"

:laugh:eek:k....just had to get your attention and try and provoke you to make a biblical case for your ideas....have not seen it yet:wavey:
This is where you simply make pure unwarranted supposition....Adam is not mentioned at ANY point in the entire chapter Icon, not once. Zero, Zilch, Nada.

You now say that you agree that ALL SINNED....at one point in time,correct?

If it was not in Adam at the fall....when was it? Do you have some secret knowledge on this? there were no chapter divisions in these writings , they were added later. Paul shows how all are condemned in Chapters 1-3, then he shows how Christ is the God given propitiation.
Then He zeros in on that ONE POINT....in TIME.....the FALL....

he repeats the aorist tense.....yes...even Wesley,who was no friend to the biblical truths as I and others would hold.....even Wesley...saw the same truth. The others listed saw and verify it.It will never change....If you do not agree with the position, you must find support elsewhere.
All of you here who attempt to oppose this,,,,cannot make any substantial case whatsoever. You have failed yet again:thumbs:

No, you do not make your own original arguments, you copy/paste the select readings and renderings of others who have taught you to believe as they do. As I said, you are Confession-first:Scripture-second, you reinforce that here:

Wrong....what I have put before you is scripture first...you just have no answer for it so you make this claim.I do not have to make any "original" argument here. It is plain and straight-forward.I am just a regular believer, why would you expect me to offer something that these godly teachers might have missed? When i see things that i cannot word any better ..I post them so others can benefit from them as I have.
If we meet in person...it will be with just bibles....After ...you can determine for yourself if I offer any scripture FIRST or not.

You appear to have no idea what you are talking about when you say "The Church" has "known" something. All that means historically, is that the particular sub-set of Christian Theologians from your particular ethno-social tradition have believed this in a majority for a signifigant period of time.

You can make that claim if you want....I do not share it.
Certainly, No one in the Eastern or Orthodox traditions believes as you do, and decidedly,

That does not concern me.....except for a remnant most of them hold to a dead formalism from what I can see.{ I nor you have travelled everywhere to examine in detail everyone of these churches} but I have no interest in them and their dead liturgy, and stale ideas.

not every-one in even your particular tradition has (though most have). You have little idea how ethno-centric and limited this statement of yours is.
We speak in generalities here....but it seems as if you are avoiding the clear issue in question , trying to pull in everything you can to avoid dealing with the texts as offered. You say you agree , but it does not follow that you would agree and resist at the same time.

No one was throwing "rocks" at you, Sigmund. You are being thin-skinned today.
Your parrotted argument from Romans 3:23 is this:
However, you have not in any way exegeted the passage, you simply quoted a few selections from YOUR PARTICULAR Point of View
,

All those I listed have opened the passage up.because you do not agree as you claim you do, you shift the focus to me...in vain.The passage as written is what is at issue. You avoid it once again...I understand:thumbs:

the argument simply isn't that powerful, Icon because it is loaded with pre-supposition. You must understand that you are taking the particular grammatical form of the simple particle and extrapolated back to Adam in a chapter where Adam is not even mentioned. Whether or not your POV is correct, this is simply NOT a great argument for it.
...


I believe this is not refutable. If I believe it or not ...does not matter, or change the text....it stands and will not change.


Many of your quotes come from "COMMENTARIES" anyway...it is the purpose of a Commentary to take some liberty and expound BASED UPON PRE-SUPPOSITION That's fine.
You hardly realize that Wesley doesn't exactly make your point either...you think he does, but you need to read your own source more carefully next time
.

When I read someone like Wesley...I take what i can from Him, but sooner or later...we must part ways. Even cal commentators...sooner or later we must part ways...this is how it is.Because I quote a source.....does not mean I agree with every word of that teacher...I quote it when there is something of value.....


You are actually reading your own supposition INTO your commentary too. I wouldn't appeal to Commentary to prove such a point, but you do. And yet, you are getting huffy and defensive because the entire board has not reacted to it by immediately swallowing it hook, line and sinker. Sorry Dude, make a better case.

Hos...I will not lose any sleep over it.I do what I can with what I have at my disposal. If there is something of value, take it with you. If not leave it.
7 Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why is it you don't understand what Winman wrote. You know the Bible says in the last days men would rather believe a lie rather than the truth. I suppose this is why you can't believe the simple truth.
MB

:laugh: friend ...coming from you who denies that gentiles are among the elect of God....I am glad you feel this way:wavey:I have not seen you present anything that resembles biblical truth in any consistent fashion.
You can accuse me or others here.....but you cannot make a biblical case which is what is important,:thumbsup::thumbs:

it might be helpful for you to pay attention to ANNSNI.....in the other thread as she is schooling you as Aquila and Priscilla schooled Apollos;
6 And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MB

Well-Known Member
:laugh: friend ...coming from you who denies that gentiles are among the elect of God....I am glad you feel this way:wavey:I have not seen you present anything that resembles biblical truth in any consistent fashion.
You can accuse me or others here.....but you cannot make a biblical case which is what is important,:thumbsup::thumbs:

it might be helpful for you to pay attention to ANNSNI.....in the other thread as she is schooling you as Aquila and Priscilla schooled Apollos;
6 And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.

Then show me just one Gentile in scripture being elected?
MB
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Then show me just one Gentile in scripture being elected?
MB

Hint;

Anyone .....any sinner .....who is saved.....was Elected by God, In Christ, before the world began.....
48 And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed.


9 Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began,

10 But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel:

11 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.

1 Thessalonians 1 (King James Version)

1 Thessalonians 1

King James Version (KJV)

1 Paul, and Silvanus, and Timotheus, unto the church of the Thessalonians which is in God the Father and in the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

2 We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our prayers;

3 Remembering without ceasing your work of faith, and labour of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, in the sight of God and our Father;

4 Knowing, brethren beloved, your election of God
 

salzer mtn

Well-Known Member
Then show me just one Gentile in scripture being elected?
MB
1 Peter 1:1-2 Peter an Apostle of Jesus Christ to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you. and peace, be multiplied.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
1 Peter 1:1-2 Peter an Apostle of Jesus Christ to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you. and peace, be multiplied.
He was addressing Jewish disciples. Gentiles wouldn't have even understood what 'elect' meant.
 

salzer mtn

Well-Known Member
1 Thess 1:1-4 Paul and Sivanus and Timotheus, unto the CHURCH of the Thessalonians which is in God the Father and in the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace be to you, and peace, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ. We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our prayers: Remembering without ceasing your work of faith, and labour of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, in the sight of God and our Father; Knowing, brethren beloved your ELECTION of God.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
HeirofSalvation


You can feel however you want to...but you cannot accept the plain truth of romans 3:23/5:12.....all sinned as a completed action in time past...one point in time. Your whining and accusations will never change it.

All sinned...all died in Adam.....you cannot answer to it, your ideas have no place for it.....that is your issue, not mine:wavey:

The argument is "not Mine"...it has been known and understood in the church for a long time. Looks as if you are out of bullets:thumbs::wavey: I could tell when you start throwing rocks toward me:wavey:

The
root
of man’s sinfulness is his corporate identification with Adam’s sin,
for “all have sinned,” v. 23a.
(a)
A more precise translation here reads, “For all sinned,” emphasizing the
aorist tense, which lumps together all of mankind into a single class.

Furthermore, in contrast with the present tense of, “and are falling
short of the glory of God,” there is strong inference here that man as a
corporate race is perceived as having sinned from the beginning with
Adam (cf. 5:12 where “sin” is usedin the same aoristic manner).
1


Have sinned (ἥμαρτον)

Aorist tense: sinned, looking back to a thing definitely past - the historic occurrence of sin.

This reconciliation or atonement is ours in Christ in the same way sin, condemnation, and death became ours in Adam (implied). Hence, Paul uses Adam as a model, type, or a pattern of Christ [v. 14, last part]. The reason why Adam’s sin brought universal death is “because all sinned” in Adam, our father and representative, and not like Adam, our personal sins.

Note: In his commentary on Romans, John Murray gives five reasons why Paul meant in Adam and not like Adam:

Historically, not all die because they sinned like Adam. For example, babies have no personal sins, yet they die.

The use of the aorist tense implies a once-for-all act in the past. Compare this with Romans 3:23 (“all sinned,” i.e., in the past, also in the aorist tense, and “all are coming short of God’s glory” [i.e., sinning personally], in the present continuous tense).

In verses 13 and 14 (immediate context), the people who lived from Adam to Moses were dying (i.e., before God gave mankind His law as a legal code), even though their sins were unlike Adam’s deliberate transgression of a law [Gen. 2:16,17].

In verses 15-18 (unit context) Paul makes it clear that all men are judged, condemned, and die because of Adam’s sin, with no mention of their personal sins.

Paul is using Adam as a pattern or a type of Christ in Romans 5:12-21 [v. 14b]. If we insist that all die because we all sinned personally like Adam; for this analogy to fit Christ, we would have to teach that all live because all have obeyed personally like Christ. Not only is this the very opposite of Paul’s thought, but we would be guilty of making him teach legalism, something he fought against vehemently.





Wesley's Notes

3:23 For all have sinned - In Adam, and in their own persons; by a sinful nature, sinful tempers, and sinful actions. And are fallen short of the glory of God - The supreme end of man; short of his image on earth, and the enjoyment of him in heaven.


The continuous present tense here indicates that man sins on a day by
day basis and not merely occasionally
. His sinning is an inevitable result
of sin as a principle. Because he is a child of Adam, he
will sin, t
hough he does so agreeably. Man can only walk along a straight line in a crooked manner; he staggers on and on as if intoxicated, and that being under the influence of sin.


To sin is to act contrary to the will and law of God. Everybody is born into Adam and thus all sinned for when he sinned, for he acted as the representative for all his descendants. Men are not only sinners by nature, but are also sinners by practice and thus continually fall short (see below), in committing sin themselves. Thus there is a universal need for the gospel, which is thankfully mercifully universally available!

The aorist tense here is referred to as "timeless aorist" which gathers up the whole human race for all time into this condemnation (see also A T Robertson). There are no exceptions save Christ Jesus as Paul has made clear in the preceding indictment in (Ro 1:18-3:20) Godet agrees writing that the aorist tense

'transports us to the point of time when the result of human life appears as a completed fact, the hour of judgment."

MacDonald writes that the aorist tense pictures the fact that...

Everybody sinned in Adam; when he sinned,
he acted as the representative for all his descendants. But men are not only sinners by nature; they are also sinners by practice.

Leon Morris writes that...

The aorist pictures this as past, but also as a completion. It certainly does not mean that sin belongs wholly in the past, for Paul goes on to a present tense when he says fall short of the glory of God. Elsewhere in Romans the glory is often future (Ro 2:7, 10; 5:2; 8:18, 21). But there is also a present glory, for God “made his light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ” (2 Cor. 4:6; cf. 2 Cor. 3:18; John 17:22). But this is something Christ produces in believers. Sinners fall short of it. Not only did all sin in the past, but they continually come short of God’s glory. (Ibid)

Vincent writes that the aorist tense means...

looking back to a thing definitely past — the historic occurrence of sin.


Remember that men and women sin because we are sinners by nature. A plum tree bears plums because it is a plum tree. The fruit is the result of its nature. Sin is the fruit of a sinful heart. “The heart is deceitful above all things” (Jer 17:9).

The very reason Paul puts it this way in Galatians 3:

Before the faith came; But the scripture hath concluded all under sin,
Condemned by the sin in the past.
Christ by his faith in his blood, knowing before time began God, His Father had promised the hope of eternal life, Jesus gave his life, died for our sins, becoming a propitiation, place of mercy, for those past sins and for the righteousness of God, from that time forward.
After the faith did come;

By the way, we are not saved by what we believe about that. That is how we were saved, applied when God calls unto salvation.
 

HisWitness

New Member
I knew this would turn into "What about infants?"

Conceived and born of corrupt parents, they are corrupt and unholy at conception, and those who die outside faith in Christ die in their sin.

God does not judge according to the outward appearance of cuddliness and innocence. He judges righteously.

the whole issue surrounding infants is the notion of infants being thrown into hell fire--and with todays logic of the purpose of that fire it will always be conflict and denial of this truth--Man's biggest mess he has made for himself is the misunderstanding of what the FIRE will accomplish :godisgood:
 

salzer mtn

Well-Known Member
1Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus:

2Grace be to you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.

3Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:

4According as he hath CHOSEN us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:

5Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,

6To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.

7In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;

8Wherein he hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence;

9Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:

10That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him:
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
God knew them:
Hear this word that the LORD hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. Amos 3:1,2

God divided them:
Howbeit I will not rend away all the kingdom; [but] will give one tribe to thy son for David my servant's sake, and for Jerusalem's sake which I have chosen. 1 Kings 11:13 Paul was of that tribe.

God declared concerning them:
I said, I would scatter them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among men: Deuteronomy 32:26 Could not apply to all of them for because of there customs and works of the law we have always known where the house of Judah, the Jews were.

God gave a part of them a bill of divorce:
And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also. Jeremiah 3:8

God called the ones he divorced, not my people.
And she conceived again, and bare a daughter. And [God] said unto him, Call her name Loruhamah: for I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel; but I will utterly take them away. But I will have mercy upon the house of Judah, and will save them by the LORD their God, and will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen. Then said [God], Call his name Loammi: for ye not my people, and I will not be your [God]. Hosea 1:6,7,9

God scattered them and caused, the remembrance of them to cease from among men:
For, lo, I will command, and I will sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as [corn] is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth. Amos 9:9 ---But God knows where each and everyone is.

God scattered them where?:
Israel is swallowed up: now shall they be among the Gentiles as a vessel wherein [is] no pleasure. Hosea 8:8

Has God forgotten them?:
God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Romans 11:2 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. Romans 11:1

Is God calling?:
Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?


God and the Gentiles:
Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name. Acts 15:14

Is it written in the prophets, this would take place, Acts 15:15?:
Turn, O backsliding children, saith the LORD; for I am married unto you: and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion: Jeremiah 3:14

Turn, it says, who turns?: --- The most important.
Hear me, O LORD, hear me, that this people may know that thou the LORD God, and thou hast turned their heart back again. 1 Kings 18:37
 
Last edited by a moderator:

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
HeirofSalvation;

I think there is no other way to biblically see it, no matter what theology you claim.



:laugh:eek:k....just had to get your attention and try and provoke you to make a biblical case for your ideas....have not seen it yet:wavey:


You now say that you agree that ALL SINNED....at one point in time,correct?

If it was not in Adam at the fall....when was it? Do you have some secret knowledge on this? there were no chapter divisions in these writings , they were added later. Paul shows how all are condemned in Chapters 1-3, then he shows how Christ is the God given propitiation.
Then He zeros in on that ONE POINT....in TIME.....the FALL....

he repeats the aorist tense.....yes...even Wesley,who was no friend to the biblical truths as I and others would hold.....even Wesley...saw the same truth. The others listed saw and verify it.It will never change....If you do not agree with the position, you must find support elsewhere.
All of you here who attempt to oppose this,,,,cannot make any substantial case whatsoever. You have failed yet again:thumbs:



Wrong....what I have put before you is scripture first...you just have no answer for it so you make this claim.I do not have to make any "original" argument here. It is plain and straight-forward.I am just a regular believer, why would you expect me to offer something that these godly teachers might have missed? When i see things that i cannot word any better ..I post them so others can benefit from them as I have.
If we meet in person...it will be with just bibles....After ...you can determine for yourself if I offer any scripture FIRST or not.



You can make that claim if you want....I do not share it.
That does not concern me.....except for a remnant most of them hold to a dead formalism from what I can see.{ I nor you have travelled everywhere to examine in detail everyone of these churches} but I have no interest in them and their dead liturgy, and stale ideas.


We speak in generalities here....but it seems as if you are avoiding the clear issue in question , trying to pull in everything you can to avoid dealing with the texts as offered. You say you agree , but it does not follow that you would agree and resist at the same time.

,

All those I listed have opened the passage up.because you do not agree as you claim you do, you shift the focus to me...in vain.The passage as written is what is at issue. You avoid it once again...I understand:thumbs:

...


I believe this is not refutable. If I believe it or not ...does not matter, or change the text....it stands and will not change.


.

When I read someone like Wesley...I take what i can from Him, but sooner or later...we must part ways. Even cal commentators...sooner or later we must part ways...this is how it is.Because I quote a source.....does not mean I agree with every word of that teacher...I quote it when there is something of value.....




Hos...I will not lose any sleep over it.I do what I can with what I have at my disposal. If there is something of value, take it with you. If not leave it.
7 Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things.
Everything you just said was non-sense...it didn't make sense, it was rambling and irrelevant...you prove your point not one whit. I'm sorry I have to say it, but you don't BELONG on a "debate" board....you don't know how to engage arguments...you simply don't know how to "debate". You can't exchange ideas.

You seem to be some tragic character who seems to think that God himself has somehow called you to offer "correction" to the fallacies found on the internet, and that that is somehow your ministry...it isn't. You are like the 21-year old young man who thinks he was "Called" to preach and yet...time after time, he puts everyone to sleep and frankly: sux at preaching.

You can't debate, you can't exchange ideas. You make no sense, and you don't know how ridiculous you sound. There is no responding to you. You may think that you are doing the "Lord's Work" by offering your "correction" on this board, but...you simply aren't....what's the word???......"GOOD" enough at it, for that to be God's calling for you. Seek to serve the Lord in other ways, you'd be FAR less frustrated. Give your hard-earned money and drive a bus. Show up for "Church work day", and attend "visitation"...but offering "correction" on Baptist Board, isn't your venue.

Sorry, God didn't call you to it.
 

HisWitness

New Member
Everything you just said was non-sense...it didn't make sense, it was rambling and irrelevant...you prove your point not one whit. I'm sorry I have to say it, but you don't BELONG on a "debate" board....you don't know how to engage arguments...you simply don't know how to "debate". You can't exchange ideas.

You seem to be some tragic character who seems to think that God himself has somehow called you to offer "correction" to the fallacies found on the internet, and that that is somehow your ministry...it isn't. You are like the 21-year old young man who thinks he was "Called" to preach and yet...time after time, he puts everyone to sleep and frankly: sux at preaching.

You can't debate, you can't exchange ideas. You make no sense, and you don't know how ridiculous you sound. There is no responding to you. You may think that you are doing the "Lord's Work" by offering your "correction" on this board, but...you simply aren't....what's the word???......"GOOD" enough at it, for that to be God's calling for you. Seek to serve the Lord in other ways, you'd be FAR less frustrated. Give your hard-earned money and drive a bus. Show up for "Church work day", and attend "visitation"...but offering "correction" on Baptist Board, isn't your venue.

Sorry, God didn't call you to it.

at least he gave you a scripture that you refuse to deal with -- all you know to do is bash him to make yourself look good :-(

ALL have sinned means ALL of mankind have sinned is the past tense so deal with the scripture he gave please ???
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
at least he gave you a scripture that you refuse to deal with -- all you know to do is bash him to make yourself look good :-(

ALL have sinned means ALL of mankind have sinned is the past tense so deal with the scripture he gave please ???

He and I have exchanged for longer than you have been on this board dude. I have exchanged with him for a LONG time. You came here how long ago??

I don't "REFUSE" to deal with his Scriptures...he has posted ONE verse, guy....only ONE...Romans 3:23, and actually, his ENTIRE argument stemmed form only one particle of it...Do you know what a "particle" is??? one grammatical construct!!! His entire argument doesn't rest upon exegeting the whole verse, but rather arguing the original grammatical Greek TENSE of ONE Particle!!! And you accuse ME!!! of not using Scripture!!! I actually posted an exegetical idea spanning the ENTIRE chapter...I quoted (from Scripture) THE SAME CHAPTER!!! Right here...and I Quote MYSELF!!
This is where you simply make pure unwarranted supposition....Adam is not mentioned at ANY point in the entire chapter Icon, not once. Zero, Zilch, Nada. What the Chapter does say, and repeatedly...is that individuals have purposed to DO wicked things, and become wicked see here:
Rom 3:12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable;
Rom 3:13 Their throat [is] an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit;
Rom 3:16 Destruction and misery [are] in their ways:
That is Scripture Mr......"HIS Witness" .................
UHH...........

DUHHHHH............

But you say that "he gave a Scripture" that we won't "deal" with????

You've diluded yourself....I place you in the same category as Icon........not worth responding to...
This isn't your ministry, you can't debate, you can't exchange ideas, you can't learn..
Drive a bus, give your money, show up to "Church work day"....but don't put yourself on record, because you now sound as....well....."Iconesque"...as Icon himself does.
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
ALL have sinned means ALL of mankind have sinned is the past tense so deal with the scripture he gave please ???
OH....and NO one is arguing that fact dude.....I agree with you....but, you don't seem to realize that it doesn't prove your point :sleep:
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
(Hiswitness)ALL have sinned means ALL of mankind have sinned is the past tense so deal with the scripture he gave please ???
I just need everyone to see this emphasized....an obvious Calvinist screaming about how "ALL" means "ALL"....:laugh::laugh:

This is too delicious to pass up:laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top