KJVkid said:
It is clear that you don't know much about wine or alcoholic beverages. by baptist "believer"
That’s what I said, but not to you. It was in response to some ridiculous claims that half a glass of wine lowers
everyone’s inhibitions and allows them to enter into sexual immorality to which they would not enter if they did not have those three or four ounces of wine. The other poster strongly insinuated that sexual immorality would be very rare if alcoholic beverages were banned. Views like that don’t seem to take the biblical view of our sin nature very seriously.
Respectfully sir, it seems to me you don't know much about the Sinless Son of God.
Well, I know the sinless Son of God personally, and I happen to be one of His disciples. I’ve carefully studied His life and have tried to enact his teaching and disciplines into my life with varying success.
Do you know the qualifications of the High Priest?
I’m not sure what you are driving at, but I have a pretty good understanding of it. However, if you are trying to say Jesus was subject to the rules of temple, then you would be mistaken. Jesus was not of the tribe of Levi which was required for the ministry of the temple. Instead, the New Testament makes it explicitly clear that the priesthood of Jesus surpassed the priesthood of Aaron, and that Jesus is a “priest forever in the order of Melchizedek” (see Hebrews 5:6). Of course, Melchizedek, the king of Salem, is mentioned in the book of Genesis as one who brought “bread and
wine” to Abram (see Genesis 14:18)!
Do you know that in Christ there was no sin nor guile found in His mouth?
Sure. Are you also following his example by being honest with scripture instead of trying to twist it to meet your presuppositions?
Do you know He didn't even accept the "vinegar" offered to Him on the cross?
He didn’t accept the narcotic “vinegar” on the cross, but the scriptural evidence demonstrates He did drink wine. A natural reading of the accusations of the Pharisees, as well as a straightforward reading of the wedding at Cana demonstrate that.
As someone who strives to interpret scripture according to the plain sense of the text instead of a theological/social agenda, I can come to no other conclusion. And moreover, this modern view of abstinence from alcohol is has only been around for only about 180 years in the United States. Lyman Beecher started his Temperance Society in 1825 that stressed abstinence from all forms of alcohol. Before that time (and significantly after), Baptists freely used alcoholic beverages in moderation. So what you are advocating is not actually the old way, but something very new in Christian life.
Yet you say The Lord Jesus drank alcohol? That's despicable!!
That’s because I hold to what I believe the Bible actually teaches. The longer I look at this issue, the more obvious it becomes. By the way, thanks for mentioning the “high priest” angle. I’ve never really noticed (in the context of a discussion of alcohol) that Melchizedek (the type of Christ in the Old Testament) gave bread and wine to Abram. If you claim that Melchizedek is despicable for providing wine to Abram, then by correlation, you are condemning Christ for giving his followers bread and wine.