Perhaps that is the above posters point? Perhaps if positively stated, he is saying that an M.Div. from NOBTS is MORE than adequate pastoral preparation for the pastoral ministry and it is mind boggling (to him) why you feel compelled to do anything further unless it was accredited as that is the only way to use those degrees to teach at most (not all) institutions.
Or perhaps it is just intellectual snobbery :tongue3: In either case, perhaps he is more well intentioned than is coming across... I'm sympathetic as with many there are "degrees" of degree value. I've heard someone in academia say that TRACS isn't even legitimate accreditation. They are legitimate enough for CHEA and they accredit BIBLICAL schools, whereas ATS (Association of Theological Schools) is the gold standard and accredits schools that actively teach Universalism... WHY on earth would ATS take precedence over TRACS???? That is Caarazzyyy...
It's not intellectual snobbery. It's just a recognition that the doctorates mentioned are not really at the doctoral level. He referred to them, "the courses are like con't ed brush up courses for me." This is quite telling. I have no problem with someone pursuing continuing education, even from unaccredited sources. I do take issue with passing off a degree as being doctoral level when it clearly is not. (My "Beef" in this is mostly with the institution rather than the students, to be clear.)
I love non-traditional education. I personally think ATS (the accreditation agency, not the school) is a complete joke of an agency, full of apostate organizations with some evangelical schools in the mix. I also think they are stuck in the past with regards to distance education, among other things.
I like TRACS, but I'm wary of graduate degrees that aren't regionally accredited. While the degrees are legitimate, in many cases, a graduate degree from a TRACS-accredited school may not open that many doors. For ministry, it is less of an issue, but, for instance, I wonder about the utility of Tennessee Temple University's PhD in leadership. I could see it as a good degree for a pastor or ministry leader, but as one working in higher ed, I recognize it would be a waste of time for someone like me. Many secular employers look for regional accreditation as well. Teaching in a university or college almost always requires a regionally accredited degree.
In my mind, the differences between TRACS and regional accreditation are mostly in terms of available resources. IMO, regionally accredited schools will be more likely to have greater resources for faculty, staff, and students (think $$$). I don't think this necessarily means that the education is always better, though.
Even some unaccredited schools can provide a solid education in the subject matter. What I have found, however, is that there is a general trend among unaccredited institutions to offer degrees at levels higher than their instruction justifies. I am also especially suspicious when schools claim bogus accreditation. They should simply be honest--we are unaccredited. Even so, just because a school doesn't necessarily want regional accreditation doesn't mean that the school couldn't try for TRACS or DETC accreditation (both recognized by the CHEA).