Yes, those that adopt the view of "freedom of the will" seem to justify their doctrine.
However, as the great Baptist theologian Johnathan Edwards points out in the hallmark work, "Freedom of the Will," there is no such ability outside those who are believers. See
"Freedom of the Will" by Jonathan Edwards
One is either a believer (saved) or heathen and bound by sin and death. There is no true "freedom of choice/will" as far as to be saved or not. Once saved, the believer has TWO natures, one that rattles and battles against the new nature born of Christ. The believer may then be considered (as was Adam) with the true freedom of choice/will.
One other matter related to this idea of "freedom of the will:"
In my opinion, order to bypass the Calvinistic thinking and teaching, the more Armenian thinking folks had to develop an ethereal state; a place, in which God would lift a person and place a person, so that they could then of "freedom of the will" choose or reject Christ. In a sense, the person would become as that of Adam to choose between God and Death. I have heard some who would even make the point of conviction as a movement to that place by God so that the person could then know and choose.
Two points:
First, NO WHERE is this (preceding or prevenient grace) taught or even alluded too in Scriptures. It is a totally man constructed concept which has to rip Scriptures out of any relatively true meaning to support.
Second, because this "doctrine" is not Scripturally sound, and because it is a linchpin to many modernists who desire there to be "freedom of choice/will", it has been taught for decades in the classrooms of churches, schools and seminaries as if it were fact. Therefore, when confronted with the truth, many of that teaching react strongly and attempt to repulse the truth and often reject the truth in favor of a more comfortable and crowd pleasing, less harsh and judgmental, ear tickling teaching.
So, the question is, does one embrace the real truth, or does one cozy up to a lie that was formed as a convenience to cover and delude what was the truth?