There is also a big danger of trampling underfoot the precious blood of Jesus for our salvation, for if one denies that he bore the very burden of their sins, what Jesus are they really trusting in to save from their sins?Now? Several Reformed people (mostly Presbyterian) woukd agree with me, but this is a small group trying to being their faith closer to Scripture (the "reform the Reformed" guys). I doubt any Reformed Baptists would agree.
There are many Baptist groups that agree with me. If you look at early Baptists all of them agreed with me. Today, I think most Western Baptists would disagree with me.
BUT, to quote Spurgeon, "men go to Hell in the lump, they go to Heaven individually".
This does not mean all who hold Calvin's theories are carried away by their philosophy. I believe most are not. I was one of those that were not, but I believe I was on that path.
That said, there are many who have been carried away from the faith by these philosophies. They cannot highlight their faith in the Bible (in God's actual words, verbatim) either. And "on that day" they will cry out "Lord, Lord", only to hear "I never knew you". That is the danger of abandoning "what is written" ("every word that comes from God") in favor of what men say the Bible teaches (ones "own understanding", philosophy).
except that Jesus as the sin bearer became as t were sin for us, so while he ALWAYS remained the Holy and spotless Lamb of God, while upon that Cross he became for our sake the mercy seat, the very one who took from the Father what was due unto us.@JesusFan
How many times have you asked me if I thought it woukd be unfair to have God the Father vent His holy Wrath upon the lord Jesus, that it would be "cosmic child abuse?"
Ten? Twenty?
How many times have I told you that I it would not be unfair and that those who claim it is "cosmic child abuse" do not understand Calvinism?
Ten? Twenty?
Let this be the last time, please.
No, I do not believe it would be unfair or amount to cosmic child abuse.
It is, however, not in God's words (the "words that come from God", "what is written") and it is a teaching very different from what the Bible teaches if the Bible teaches "what is written" (God's words).
It also calls into question the righteousness of God (God would have committed an "abomination" by clearing the guilty and punishing the righteous).
Again, on what BASIS can Holy God declare us Justified then, for still he truth is the soul that sins must die, and that would mean either we will die for our sins, or else someone one takes in our place upon themselvesNo, the lost are not currently in Hell. No, before we were saved we were not in Hell.
The wicked will be raised to condemnation while those of us who are in Christ will be raised to life. The wicked store up wrath for themselves for the Day of Wrath. God will separate peoole.
One grouo, those in Christ, ate not guilty of the sins of the "old man", they have been refined as gold and silver is refined, they have been made new creations in Christ, they have been conformed to the image of Christ. These will inherit life.
The other group, the wicked, will experience the wrath they have stored up for themselves. They will be cast into the Lake of Fire which has been prepared for Satan and his demons. This is the Second death.
What allows God to justify us? Christ Himself. He is the Propitiation for our sins. God set Him forth as a propitiation in His blood. He became a life giving spirit. In Him we have life. In Him we are made new creations. In Him we are chosen.
Think that if you were to survey pastors teachers theologians for past centuries, Psa would be the majority and dominant view among Reformed, Baptist, and Evangelical arminiansNow? Several Reformed people (mostly Presbyterian) woukd agree with me, but this is a small group trying to being their faith closer to Scripture (the "reform the Reformed" guys). I doubt any Reformed Baptists would agree.
There are many Baptist groups that agree with me. If you look at early Baptists all of them agreed with me. Today, I think most Western Baptists would disagree with me.
BUT, to quote Spurgeon, "men go to Hell in the lump, they go to Heaven individually".
This does not mean all who hold Calvin's theories are carried away by their philosophy. I believe most are not. I was one of those that were not, but I believe I was on that path.
That said, there are many who have been carried away from the faith by these philosophies. They cannot highlight their faith in the Bible (in God's actual words, verbatim) either. And "on that day" they will cry out "Lord, Lord", only to hear "I never knew you". That is the danger of abandoning "what is written" ("every word that comes from God") in favor of what men say the Bible teaches (ones "own understanding", philosophy).