"Church English"...

[SavedByGrace]

What in the world is a false myth? Is there such a thing as a true myth? Myths are myths. Profound, huh?

here you are, Definition of MYTH

 

[RipponRedeaux]

Good old England, the HOME of the English language. All others are rip-offs!

Within England proper, what geographical area is standard English spoken?

 

[SavedByGrace]

Within England proper, what geographical area is standard English spoken?

All of England. I live in an area called Dudley which is Western England.

West London Oxford Cambridge are the place for the best English and best spoken

 

[SavedByGrace]

Within England proper, what geographical area is standard English spoken?

 

[RipponRedeaux]

West London Oxford Cambridge are the place for the best English and best spoken

You meant :
West London, Oxford and Cambridge are the geographical places in which the best forms of English are spoken.

 

[SavedByGrace]

You meant :
West London, Oxford and Cambridge are the geographical places in which the best forms of English are spoken.

Yeah

 

[Conan]

Well, I'm talking about now and the past 107 years. That's what counts.
And the correct spelling is British.

Well, was it always spelled as such in the days of the British Empire?

 

[Squire Robertsson]

Well, was it always spelled as such in the days of the British Empire?

Yes.

 

[SavedByGrace]

Here is one for you Americans.

Why do you pronounce God as Gad?

 

[Conan]

Here is one for you Americans.

Why do you pronounce God as Gad?

We don't.

 

[SavedByGrace]

We don't.

I have heard this in many sermons

 

[SavedByGrace]

We don't.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

Here is one for you Americans.

Why do you pronounce God as Gad?

Who knows? That's a question for linguists.

 

[Baptist4life]

Do you use a bad argument when you asserted your stated human opinion to be a fact without proving it to be a fact?

You merely assume and do not prove what you claimed to be true. You have not proven from the Scripture that you hold and advocate the biblical understanding of inspiration. Perhaps you hold a non-biblical understanding of inspiration.

Textual criticism can be an effort to follow scriptural truth and instruction to remove any words added by men, restore any words omitted by copiers, and correct any changed words that diminish the meaning of the preserved original language words of Scripture. How would a just application of scriptural truth be humanistic?

Would you claim that the textual criticism of a humanist Erasmus corrupted the Biblical understanding of inspiration?

I had already responded to your superficial reasons. Now give some sound examples.

Why would someone who claims to understand KJV language be unable to comprehend clear points that would state or affirm scriptural truth as translated in the KJV?

Do they not comprehend that the word of God is not bound?

Do they not comprehend that the wisdom from God above is without partiality and without hypocrisy?

Do they not comprehend that use of divers measures [double standards] is an abomination to the LORD?

Do they not comprehend that the opinions and traditions of men are not a doctrine of God?

Can they not comprehend that textual criticism could be described as an effort to follow scriptural truth and instruction to remove any words added by men, restore any words omitted by copiers, and correct any changed words that diminish the meaning of the preserved original language words of Scripture?[/QUOTE,] seen excellent example of what I was referring to. I've never met a single person who speaks, o posts, like you do. Your one weird fellow.

An excellent example of what I was referring to. I've never met a single human being who speaks, or posts, like you. You sir, are one strange fellow.

 

[SavedByGrace]

Who knows? That's a question for linguists.

or pronunciation?

 

[RipponRedeaux]

An excellent example of what I was referring to. I've never met a single human being who speaks, or posts, like you. You sir, are one strange fellow.

You quoted me as if I had objected to what Logos 1560 had said. In fact that was not the case.

 

[Baptist4life]

I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about logos.

 

[RipponRedeaux]

I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about logos.

Why did you quote me then?

 

[RipponRedeaux]

All of England.

Surely you don't consider Cockney as standard English.

 

[Reynolds]

Here is one for you Americans.

Why do you pronounce God as Gad?

I don't.