Alan Gross
Well-Known Member
The spiritually dead hear after God regenerates them and gives them eyes to see and ears to hear.
Proverbs 20:12
12 "The hearing ear, and the seeing eye, the Lord hath made even both of them"!
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The spiritually dead hear after God regenerates them and gives them eyes to see and ears to hear.
No. As far as I am concerned all of Scripture matters. BUT to add all of Scripture as being the gospel of Jesus Christ is to change the actual gospel.So, as far as you are concerned, everything else is fine and dandy beyond that? No other standards besides just personal preferences?
Is that your idea of evangelism? Just ask a person, "Do you believe that Jesus is the Messiah, and that He died, was buried, and rose from the dead?" And if they say, "Yes", then you say, "Next!"?
No inquiry about who they believe Jesus to be, nothing about them being a lost sinner who is incapable of producing the perfect righteousness that is needed to stand perfect before God, nothing about looking to Christ as the Lord our Righteousness, none of that?
Yep....all four.Proverbs 20:12
12 "The hearing ear, and the seeing eye, the Lord hath made even both of them"!
No. As far as I am concerned all of Scripture matters. BUT to add all of Scripture as being the gospel of Jesus Christ is to change the actual gospel.
That does not make sense.Yeah, like I said, I can imagine you defending the Judaizers against the apostle Paul, as you come across as an "either/or" person when it comes to Biblical doctrine.
Unrelated? No. But the gospel message is specific.Do you think that any part of the Bible is unrelated to the gospel of Christ?
Why do you believe Paul proclaimed that he preached the gospel - Christ crucified - and nothing else?
Unrelated? No. But the gospel message is specific.
Your belief is akin to deus otiosus - God has set up everything but then sits back and watches it unfold as He has designed, never truly interacting with man.
BUT to add all of Scripture as being the gospel of Jesus Christ is to change the actual gospel.
I was actually quoting Paul (see what I mean about you rejecting Scripture).Yeah, you really do sound like your idea of the doctrine of the gospel of Christ is a few historical facts about Jesus as a man(nothing about sin and the need for a perfect righteousness), and the rest is basically "free-range" theology.
The issue is nobody is denying that. You are the only one denying Scripture (like your condemnation of Paul's words about what he preached).God is sovereign...all the time. All the time...God is sovereign.
(see what I mean about you rejecting Scripture).
The issue is nobody is denying that.
You are inventing a straw man argument.
There is a reason God gave us His Word, and it was not for you to pick out what you like and dismiss the rest.
You are the only one denying Scripture
No. You redefined the gospel as accepting your theology excluding that God responds to man. That is "another gospel" not preached in Scripture.What a load of baloney. I even noted the verse reference, which you did not, and quoted John Gill's commentary on the verse. All we basically get from you, sounding like Gomer Pyle on "The Andy Griffith Show" - "You reject the Scripture! You reject the Scripture!"
You redefined the gospel as accepting your theology excluding that God responds to man
The fact is that most, if not all, of Scripture speaks of God responding to man (either positively or negatively).
By removing that from "your Bible"
God is sovereign...all the time. All the time...God is sovereign
like God punishing people for sin
God answering prayer,